Statistical support of selection decisions at early stage of cereal breeding. Part I. Methods of estimation of treatment effects

Katarzyna Ambroży

katarzyna.ambrozy-deregowska@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Ewa Bakinowska


Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Jan Bocianowski


Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Anna Budka


Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Wiesław Pilarczyk


Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Bogna Zawieja


Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Abstract

At early stages of plant breeding the field trials are usually performed with use of very high number of lines. Often the number of such lines exceeds 1000. Among them, there are genotypes with high values of an observed trait, genotypes with medium values and genotypes characterized by low values of the trait. For various reasons such trials are usually laid down in one replicate with use of one or several standard varieties repeated many times and systematically placed in experimental field among tested lines. After one year of trials, a breeder has just single observations for the tested lines and is forced (by economy) to make very severe reduction of experimental material making selection of the best lines. In the paper, eight methods are presented that can be used for statistical elaboration of one-replicate trials with standards. Additionally, four criteria are given for selection of the best method of statistical elaboration of such data. One of these criteria relies on comparisons of genotype effects obtained by the classical analysis of variance for random subset of lines with effects of the same lines received when particular methods for elaboration of one replicate trials with standards were used. It is possible when, at the same experimental field, such additional replicated trials with (randomly chosen) subset of lines is performed. The other criterion relies on comparisons of uniformity of distributions of plots with the best (chosen for further research) lines in experimental field. As a consequence of randomization the best lines should be evenly distributed in a total area of trial.

Supporting Agencies

Work done as part of a project financed by the Agricultural Property Agency in Warsaw and coordinated by Sp. z o. o. Plant Breeding Szelejewo pt.

Keywords:

environmental index, moving average, selection decisions, unreplicated breeding trials

Besag J. E., Kempton R. A. 1986. Statistical analysis of field experiments using neighbouring plots. Biometrics 42: 231 — 251.
Google Scholar

Ceranka B., Chudzik H. 1977. Doświadczenia jednopowtórzeniowe z wzorcami. Siódme Colloquium Metodologiczne z Agro-Biometrii, PAN, Warszawa: 318 — 331.
Google Scholar

Cullis B. R., Gleeson A. C. 1989. The efficiency of neighbour analysis for replicated variety trials in Australia. Journal of Agricultural Science 113: 223 — 239.
Google Scholar

Kempton R. A., Fox P. N. 1997. Statistical methods for plant variety evaluation. Chapman & Hall.
Google Scholar

Patterson H. D., Silvey V., Talbot B., Weatherup C. 1977. Variability of yields of cereal varieties in U.K. trials. Journal of Agricultural Science 89: 238 — 245.
Google Scholar

Pilarczyk W. 1977. Optymalizacja wielkości serii doświadczeń w czasie i przestrzeni. Siódme Colloquium Metodologiczne z Agro-Biometrii, PAN, Warszawa: 272 — 282.
Google Scholar

Talbot M. 1984. Yield variability of crop varieties in the U.K. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102: 315 — 321.
Google Scholar

Utz H. F. 1997. PLABSTAT. A computer program for statistical analysis of plant breeding experiments. Version 2N. Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics, University of Hohenheim, Germany.
Google Scholar

Williams E. R. 1986. A neighbour model for field experiments. Biometrika 73: 279 — 287.
Google Scholar


Published
2008-12-31

Cited by

Ambroży, K. (2008) “Statistical support of selection decisions at early stage of cereal breeding. Part I. Methods of estimation of treatment effects”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (250), pp. 21–28. doi: 10.37317/biul-2008-0002.

Authors

Katarzyna Ambroży 
katarzyna.ambrozy-deregowska@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Ewa Bakinowska 

Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Jan Bocianowski 

Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Anna Budka 

Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Wiesław Pilarczyk 

Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Bogna Zawieja 

Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 341
PDF downloads: 18


License

Copyright (c) 2008 Katarzyna Ambroży, Ewa Bakinowska, Jan Bocianowski, Anna Budka, Wiesław Pilarczyk, Bogna Zawieja

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>