Variation and correlation analysis of important technological traits of winter wheat cultivars and strains

Tadeusz Śmiałowski

zhsmialo@cyf-kr.edu.pl
Zakład Roślin Zbożowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Kraków (Poland)

Stanisław Węgrzyn


Zakład Roślin Zbożowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Kraków (Poland)

Maria Stachowicz


Zakład Roślin Zbożowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Kraków (Poland)

Abstract

Variability, heritability and correlations were investigated for 13 parameters characterizing bread-making quality of winter wheat. The grain material of 105 cultivars and strains from the preliminary state trials of the years 2005 and 2006 was analyzed in the Department of Cereal Crops of the Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, Cracow Division. The statistical analysis, performed separately for each year, included analysis of variance and calculation of means and coefficients of variability, heritability, genotypic correlation and phenotypic correlation. The values of coefficients for both years of study were much alike. The variability coefficients ranged from 2.33% (for flour yield) to 57.3% (for dough stability). The coefficients of heritability were diverse either and varied between 0.40 (for crumb quality) and 0.94 (for sedimentation value). Generally, the coefficients of genotypic correlation proved to be higher than the corresponding ones for phenotypic correlation. The sedimentation value was significantly and positively correlated with protein content, water absorption, dough energy, bread volume, flour yield, quality number, crumb quality and gluten index. The negative correlation of the sedimentation value with softness of dough was also convenient for the selection process.


Keywords:

technological analyses, coefficients of the variability, phenotypic correlations, genotypic correlations, the winter wheat

Axford D. W. E., Mc Dermott E. E., Retman D. G. 1979. Dodecylo-sulfate test of breadmaking quality: Comparison with Pelshenke and Zeleny tests. Cereal Chem. 56 (6): 582.
Google Scholar

Banaszak Z. Majchrzycki D. 2006. Pszenica jakościowa — od hodowcy do młynarza. Przegląd Zbożowo- Młynarski: 17 — 19.
Google Scholar

Becker W. A. 1984. Quantitative genetics. Washington State University Press, Seatle, Wash.
Google Scholar

Bichoński A., Stachowicz M. 1998. Powiązanie białek gliadynowych i gluteninwych z wybranymi cechami technologicznymi rodów i odmian pszenicy ozimej. Biul. IHAR 208: 43 — 47.
Google Scholar

Bichoński A. 1995. Ocena wybranych cech technologicznych z kolekcji pszenicy ozimej. Biul. IHAR 194: 131 — 138.
Google Scholar

Ceglińska A., Cacak Pietrzak. G., Haber T. 2003. Współzależność pomiędzy cechami jakościowymi rodów pszenicy ozimej. Biul. IHAR 230: 65 — 70.
Google Scholar

Cygankiewicz A. 1997. Wartość technologiczna ziarna materiałów hodowlanych pszenicy ozimej i jarej na tle badań własnych i światowych. Biul. IHAR 204: 219 — 238.
Google Scholar

Falconer D. S., McKay T. F. C. 1996. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th. ed. Longman, Essex, England.
Google Scholar

Holland J. B. 2006. Estimating genotyping correlations and their standard errors using multivariate restricted maximum likelihood estimation with SAS Proc. MIXED. Crop Sci. 46: 642 — 654.
Google Scholar

International Cereal Chemists – Amylograph ICC Standard 126.
Google Scholar

International Cereal Chemists – Falling Number 1800 Standard Nr. 107., AACC Standard 58–81 B.
Google Scholar

International Cereal Chemists – Farinograph Resistograph ICC Standard Nr. 115., AACC Standard 20–54.
Google Scholar

International Cereal Chemists – Glutomatic system 2200 ICC Standard 137.
Google Scholar

Park S. H., Bean S.R., Chung O. K., Seib P. A. 2006. Levels of protein and protein composition in hard winter flours and relationships to breadmaking. Cereal Chemistry vol. 83: 418 — 423.
Google Scholar

Pecina M., Gunjaca J. 2000. Multivariate distance and classification of winter wheat breeding program. 22 Int. Conf. Information Technology Interfaces ITI 2000. Pula, Croatia: 232 — 328
Google Scholar

Searle S. R. 1961. Phenotypic, genotypic and environmental correlations. Biometrics 17: 474 — 480.
Google Scholar

Stehno Z., Dvoracek V., Dotlacil L. 2006. Wheat protein fractions to grain quality characters of cultivars in the Czech Republic 2004–2006. CRI. Gene Bank Department. Report: 1 — 3.
Google Scholar

Śmiałowski T., Nita Z., Witkowski E. 2006. Ocena współzależności cech pszenicy ozimej na podstawie analizy ścieżek. Biul. IHAR 240/241: 161 — 166.
Google Scholar

Śmiałowski T., Stachowicz M. 2007. Ocena wartości technologicznej nowych rodów pszenicy badanych w doświadczeniach wstępnych w latach 2005-2006. Biul. IHAR 245: 57 — 66.
Google Scholar

Węgrzyn. S., Bichoński A. 2001. Zróżnicowanie i genetyczne uwarunkowanie cech wartości technologicznej jęczmienia jarego browarnego. Biul. IHAR 220. 153 — 160.
Google Scholar

Węgrzyn S., Wojas T., Śmiałowski T. 2002. Uwarunkowania genetyczne oraz współzależność plonu i wybranych cech użytkowych pszenicy ozimej (Triticum aestivum L.) Biul. IHAR 223/224: 77 — 88.
Google Scholar

Zych. J. 2006. Wartość technologiczna odmian pszenicy. Przegląd Zbożowo-Młynarski: 7 — 12.
Google Scholar


Published
2008-12-31

Cited by

Śmiałowski, T., Węgrzyn, S. and Stachowicz, M. (2008) “Variation and correlation analysis of important technological traits of winter wheat cultivars and strains”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (249), pp. 59–66. doi: 10.37317/biul-2008-0033.

Authors

Tadeusz Śmiałowski 
zhsmialo@cyf-kr.edu.pl
Zakład Roślin Zbożowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Kraków Poland

Authors

Stanisław Węgrzyn 

Zakład Roślin Zbożowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Kraków Poland

Authors

Maria Stachowicz 

Zakład Roślin Zbożowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Kraków Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 364
PDF downloads: 42


License

Copyright (c) 2008 Tadeusz Śmiałowski, Stanisław Węgrzyn, Maria Stachowicz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>