The effect of sodium fertilization on the yield and quality parameters of sugar beet roots

Piotr M. Szulc

biuro.dziekana.wrib@pbs.edu.pl
Katedra Fizjologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy, Bydgoszcz (Poland)

Mirosław Kobierski


Katedra Gleboznawstwa i Ochrony Gleb, Uniwersytet Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy, Bydgoszcz (Poland)

Mirosław Nowakowski


Zakład Technologii Produkcji Roślin Okopowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Bydgoszcz (Poland)

Kazimierz Kubicki


Strube-Dieckmann Polska Sp. z o.o. (Poland)

Abstract

The experiment aimed to determine the impact of sodium on the yield and some quality parameters of sugar beet roots were carried out at the crop cultivation hall of the University of Technology and Life Sciences in Bydgoszcz. The following quality parameters were estimated: polarization, potassium and sodium content, alpha-amino nitrogen content, alkalinity coefficient, Brunswick formula, saccharose losses in the molasses, and biological and recoverable sugar yield. A sugar beet variety Lupus coming from the Strube-Dieckmann breeding company was used in the study. The increase in sodium doses from 50 to 150 kg•ha-1 resulted in a significant increase in beet roots weight, content of sodium and the yield of recoverable sugar. For visualization purposes, the yield data obtained for single plants were converted in the paper to yield from 1 ha.


Keywords:

roots quality, sodium, sugar beet, yield

Al-Harbi A. R. 1995. Growth and nutrient composition of tomato and cucumber seedlings as affected by sodium chloride salinity and supplemental calcium. J. Plant Nutr. 18: 1403 — 1416.
Google Scholar

Allen M. B., Arnon D. J. 1955. Studies on nitrogen-fixing blue-green algae. II. The sodium requirement of Anabaena cylindrica. Physiol. Plant. 8: 653 — 660.
Google Scholar

Allison M. F., Chapman J.L., Garat C. E., Todd A. D. 1997. The potassium, sodium, magnesium, calcium and phosphate nutrition of sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris) grown on soils containing incorporated straw. J. Sci. Food Agric. 74: 216 — 220.
Google Scholar

Allison M. F., Jaggard K. W., Armstrong M. J. 1994. Time of application and chemical form of potassium, phosphorus, magnesium and sodium fertilizers and effects on the growth, yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). J. of Agricult. Sci. 123: 61 — 70.
Google Scholar

Ashraf M. 2004. Some important physiological selection criteria for salt tolerance in plants. Flora 199: 361 — 376.
Google Scholar

Booth W. A., Beardall J. 1991. Effect of salinity on inorganic carbon utilization and carbonic anhydrates activity in the halotolerant algae Dunaliella salina (Chlorophyta). Phycologia 30: 220 — 225.
Google Scholar

Bush L. P. 1969. Influence of certain cations on activity of succinyl CoA syntheses from tobacco. Plant Physiol. 44: 347 — 350.
Google Scholar

Draycott A. P., Farley R. F. 1971. Effect of sodium and magnesium fertilisers and irrigation on growth, composition and yield of sugar beet. J. Sci. Food Agric. 22: 559 — 563.
Google Scholar

Durrant M. J., Draycott A. P., Payne P. A. 1974. Some effects of sodium chloride on germination and seedling growth of sugar beet. Ann. Bot. 38: 1045 — 1051.
Google Scholar

Goh K. M., Magat S. S., 1989. Sodium chloride increases the yield of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in two New Zealand soils. New Zealand J. Agricult. Research 32: 133 — 137.
Google Scholar

Gutmański I. 2002. Znaczenie nawożenia potasem dla efektywnej uprawy buraka cukrowego. IHAR Radzików.
Google Scholar

Henckel P. A., Bakanova L. V. 1974. O stimiljurujushhem dejstvin niebolshikh doz khloristogo natrija na sakharju sveklu. Fizjologija Rastenij 21: 812 — 818.
Google Scholar

Iqbal M., Ashraf M., Jamil A., Rehman S. 2006. Does seed priming induce changes in the levels of some endogenous plant hormones in hexaploid wheat plants under salt stress? J. Integrative Plant Biol. 48: 181 — 189.
Google Scholar

Jaggard K.W., Clark C. 1990. Remote sensing to predict the yield of sugar beet in England. In Applications of Remote Sensing in Agriculture (Eds. M.D. Steven & J.A. Clark) London: Butterworths: 201 — 206.
Google Scholar

Kabata-Pendias A., Pendias H. 1999. Biogeochemia pierwiastków śladowych. PWN, Warszawa : 268 — 270.
Google Scholar

Kao W. Y., Tsai T. T., Shih C. N. 2003. Photosynthetic gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence of three wild soybean species in response to NaCl treatments. Photosynthetica 41: 415 — 419.
Google Scholar

Kirst G. O. 1989. Salinity tolerance of eukaryotic marine algae. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant mol. Biol. 40: 21 — 53.
Google Scholar

Kubicki K., Szulc P. M. 2006. Wpływ nawożenia sodem na wybrane parametry plonu korzeni buraka cukrowego. Poradnik Plantatora Buraka Cukrowego 3: 29 — 31.
Google Scholar

Lityński T., Jurkowska H., Gorlach E. 1976. Analiza chemiczno-rolnicza. Przewodnik metodyczny do analizy gleby i nawozów: 108 — 111, 149 — 153, 157 — 160. PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Marschner H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of higher plants. 2nd Ed. Academic Press, San Diego.
Google Scholar

Milford G. F. J. Cormack W. F., Durrant M. J. 1977. Effects of sodium chloride on water status and growth of sugar beet. J. Exp. Bot. 28: 1380 — 1388.
Google Scholar

Nowakowski M, Szymczak-Nowak J., Koch H. J. 2007. Plony i zdrowotność buraka cukrowego pod wpływem nawożenia potasem, magnezem i sodem. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol., z. 518: 141 — 155.
Google Scholar

Nowotny-Mieczyńska A. 1976. Fizjologia mineralnego żywienia roślin. Wyd. II. PWRiL, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Parida A. K., Das A. B., Mittra B. 2003. Effects of NaCl stress on the structure, pigment complex composition, and photosynthetic activity of mangrove Bruguiera parviflora chloroplasts. Photosynthetica 41: 191 — 200.
Google Scholar

Prośba-Białczyk U., Mydlarski M. 2002. Wpływ chlorku sodu zastosowanego nalistnie na produkcyjność i wartość technologiczną buraka cukrowego. Biul. IHAR 222: 215 — 222.
Google Scholar

Sudhir P., Murthy S. D. S. 2004. Effects of salt stress on basic processes of photosynthesis. Photosynthetica 42: 481 — 486.
Google Scholar

Tiwari B. S., Bose A., Ghosh B. 1997. Photosynthesis in rice under a salt stress. Photosynthetica 34: 303 — 306.
Google Scholar

Warchołowa M. 1971. Wpływ Na i K na transpirację, asymilację pozorną i gromadzenie cukrów przez Buraki cukrowe. Pam. Puł. 47: 199 — 212.
Google Scholar

Wiśniewski W., 1994. Dynamika wzrostu i pobierania składników pokarmowych przez buraki cukrowe i pastewne z uwzględnieniem ich jakości. Hod. Rośl. Aklim. 38: 3 — 41.
Google Scholar

Yupsanis T., Moustakas M., Domiandou K. 1994. Protein phosphorylation-dephosphorylation in alfalfa seeds germinating under salt stress. J. Plant Physiol. 143: 234 — 240.
Google Scholar


Published
2008-06-30

Cited by

Szulc, P. M. (2008) “The effect of sodium fertilization on the yield and quality parameters of sugar beet roots ”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (248), pp. 77–85. doi: 10.37317/biul-2008-0059.

Authors

Piotr M. Szulc 
biuro.dziekana.wrib@pbs.edu.pl
Katedra Fizjologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy, Bydgoszcz Poland

Authors

Mirosław Kobierski 

Katedra Gleboznawstwa i Ochrony Gleb, Uniwersytet Technologiczno-Przyrodniczy, Bydgoszcz Poland

Authors

Mirosław Nowakowski 

Zakład Technologii Produkcji Roślin Okopowych, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Bydgoszcz Poland

Authors

Kazimierz Kubicki 

Strube-Dieckmann Polska Sp. z o.o. Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 44
PDF downloads: 54


License

Copyright (c) 2008 Piotr M. Szulc, Mirosław Kobierski, Mirosław Nowakowski, Kazimierz Kubicki

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.