Comparison of the effectiveness of insecticides in controlling of Colorado potato beetle

Marek Gugała

marek.gugala@uph.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce (Poland)

Krystyna Zarzecka


Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce (Poland)

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out in the years 2003–2005 at the Zawady Experimental Station belonging to the University of Podlasie. The experiment was set in the randomized blocks design as a three-factorial, three-replication trial. The aim of the work was assess the effectiveness of the nicotinoid insecticides that exhibit a high systemic activity in the plant and are used to control Colorado beetle. The following insecticides were applied: Actara 25 WG, Regent 200 SC and Calypso 480 SC. The effectiveness of the insecticides in controlling both larvae and adults of Colorado potato beetle was high. In the years 2003, 2004 and 2005 it reached 92.4, 94.1 and 86.2%, respectively.


Keywords:

fipronil, Colorado beetle, yield, thiamethoxam, thiachlopryd

Mrówczyński M. 1997. Metody badania skuteczności biologicznej insektycydów. Mat. Sem. „Metodyka zakładania i prowadzenia doświadczeń z zakresu ochrony roślin. IOR Poznań, 9 — 10: 47 — 50.
Google Scholar

Mrówczyński M., Wachowiak H., Pawińska M., Gadomski G. 2000. Wyniki badań wdrożeniowych insektycydu Actara 25 WG w zwalczaniu stonki ziemniaczanej Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin, 40 (2): 901 — 904.
Google Scholar

Witkowski W. 1979. Doskonalenie chemicznego zwalczania stonki ziemniaczanej Prac. Nauk IOR, 21: 15 — 62.
Google Scholar

Pawińska M., Mrówczyński M., Wachowiak H., Widerski K., Bubniewicz P., Głazek M., Jabłczyński W. 1996. Badania nad zastosowaniem fipronilu w zwalczaniu szkodników upraw rolniczych. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 36 (2): 108 — 112.
Google Scholar

Pawińska M. 2000. Propozycja wykorzystania insektycydu Regent 200 SC w zwalczaniu stonki ziemniaczanej. Top Agrar Polska 4: 58 — 59.
Google Scholar

Pawińska M., Osowski J., 1998: Wpływ zabiegów ochrony na jakość bulw. Ziemniak Polski, 4: 13 — 21.
Google Scholar

Pruszyński S., Węgorek P., Pawińska M., Mrówczyński M., Wachowiak H., Przybysz E. 2003. Strategia chemicznego zwalczania stonki ziemniaczanej (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) w Polsce. Wyd. IOR Poznań: 5.
Google Scholar

Zarzecka K., Gugała M. 2004. Skuteczność środka Calypso 480 SC w zwalczaniu stonki ziemniaczanej. Mat XLV Sesji Nauk. IOR, Poznań 12–13 luty, Streszczenia: 235 — 236.
Google Scholar

Zarzecka K., Gugała M., Artych P. 2005. Skuteczność stosowania insektycydów w zwalczaniu stonki ziemniaczanej. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin, 45 (2): 1222 — 1224.
Google Scholar


Published
2007-12-31

Cited by

Gugała, M. and Zarzecka, K. (2007) “Comparison of the effectiveness of insecticides in controlling of Colorado potato beetle”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (246), pp. 151–157. doi: 10.37317/biul-2007-0015.

Authors

Marek Gugała 
marek.gugala@uph.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce Poland

Authors

Krystyna Zarzecka 

Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 32
PDF downloads: 12


License

Copyright (c) 2007 Marek Gugała, Krystyna Zarzecka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 > >>