Factors determining application of certified seed material in farms

Dariusz R. Mańkowski

d.mankowski@ihar.edu.pl
Pracownia Ekonomiki Nasiennictwa i Hodowli Roślinm Zakład Nasiennictwa i Nasionoznawstwa, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-8016

Tadeusz Oleksiak


Pracownia Ekonomiki Nasiennictwa i Hodowli Roślinm Zakład Nasiennictwa i Nasionoznawstwa, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie (Poland)

Abstract

The farmers’ decisions on the use of certified seed are influenced by numerous factors, e.g. economical (price of sowing material, farm profit), technological (soil and crop management systems), social (education, knowledge, experience) etc. The mentioned factors are usually correlated (autocorrelation), which disturbs to give a simple answer to what the use of certified seed depends on. An attempt has been done at identification of some technological factors, which are significant for the main crops growers. The analysis based on survey research of the years 1992–2003, which was conducted on 38 500 fields of those farmers, who kept accountancy to meet the needs of Agriculture and Food Economy Institute. The data included: whole farm area, arable area, area under a specified crop, distance of a farm to a place of seed supply, soil acidity, soil quality, organic manuring, NPK fertilization, use of pesticides, rate and time of sowing. The data were subjected to the analysis of logistic regression (PROC LOGISTIC of the SAS® version 9.1) in order to determine the factors relevant for the use of certified seed material. The separate models were suggested for each of the studied crops (winter and spring wheat, spring barley, winter triticale, potato). Selection of variables for each of the models was performed using the AIC (Akaike Information Criterion) and SBC (Schwarz Bayesian Criterion). The use of certified seed was most closely related to the input factors, in particular to the mineral fertilization level and the number of fungicide treatments. The link was stated also with the production scale and total area of a farm.


Keywords:

barley, logistic regression, potatoes, seed material, survey research, triticale, wheat

Agresti A. 2002. Categorical data analysis. 2nd Edition. New Jersey, USA, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Google Scholar

Akaike H. 1969. Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 21: 243 — 247.
Google Scholar

Allison P. D. 1999. Logistic Regression Using the SAS System — Theory and Application. New York, USA, SAS Publishing, SAS Institute Inc., John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Google Scholar

Cody R. P., Smith J. K. 2005. Applied Statistics and the SAS Programming Language. 5th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, Pearson Education Inc.
Google Scholar

Der G., Everitt B. S. 2002. A handbook of statistical analyses using SAS. 2nd Edition. USA, CRC Press LLC.
Google Scholar

Krzymuski J. 1991. Postęp odmianowy w produkcji zbóż w Polsce. Cz. III. Introdukcja z hodowli do produkcji. Biul. IHAR 177: 17 — 24.
Google Scholar

Krzymuski J. 1993. Ekonomiczne aspekty nasiennictwa. Biul. IHAR 188: 187 — 193.
Google Scholar

Krzymuski J. 1998. Postęp biologiczny w rolnictwie. W: Woś A. (red.). Encyklopedia agrobiznesu. Warszawa, Fundacja Innowacja — Wyższa Szkoła Społeczno-Ekonomiczna.
Google Scholar

Oleksiak T. 1998. Wpływ kwalifikowanego materiału siewnego na plonowanie zbóż. Biul. IHAR 208: 3 — 9.
Google Scholar

Oleksiak T. 2000. Pszenżyto w produkcji — wykorzystanie efektów hodowli. Zeszyty Naukowe Akademii Rolniczej w Szczecinie, 206 Agriculturae 82: 199 — 204.
Google Scholar

Oleksiak T. 2004 Rynek nasion. Rynek Środków Produkcji i Usług dla Rolnictwa, Nr 25: 36 — 42.
Google Scholar

Oleksiak T. 2006 Rynek nasion. Rynek Środków Produkcji i Usług dla Rolnictwa, Nr 30: 30 — 36.
Google Scholar

Rawlings J. O., Pantula S. G., Dickey D. A. 2001. Applied regression analysis — a research tool. 2nd Edition. New York, USA, Springer-Verlag Inc.
Google Scholar

SAS Institute Inc. 2004 a. BASE SAS 9.1.3 Procedures guide. Cary, NC, USA, SAS Publishing, SAS Institute Inc.
Google Scholar

SAS Institute Inc. 2004 b. SAS 9.1 Companion for Windows. Cary, NC, USA, SAS Publishing, SAS Institute Inc.
Google Scholar

SAS Institute Inc. 2004 c. SAS/STAT 9.1 User's Guide. Cary, NC, USA, SAS Publishing, SAS Institute Inc.
Google Scholar

Schwarz G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6: 461 — 464.
Google Scholar

Skarżyńska A., Sadowska J., Reinstein J. 1996. Koszty jednostkowe i dochodowość produkcji rolniczej w gospodarstwach indywidualnych w 1995 roku. Zagadnienia Ekonomiki Rolnej 4/5: 80 — 123.
Google Scholar

Stokes M. E., Davis C. S. 2000. Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System. 2nd Edition. New York, USA, SAS Publishing, SAS Institute Inc., John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Google Scholar

Witek T. (red.) 1981. Waloryzacja rolniczej przestrzeni produkcyjnej Polski według gmin. Puławy, IUNG.
Google Scholar


Published
2007-06-29

Cited by

Mańkowski, D. R. and Oleksiak, T. (2007) “Factors determining application of certified seed material in farms”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (244), pp. 5–19. doi: 10.37317/biul-2007-0041.

Authors

Dariusz R. Mańkowski 
d.mankowski@ihar.edu.pl
Pracownia Ekonomiki Nasiennictwa i Hodowli Roślinm Zakład Nasiennictwa i Nasionoznawstwa, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-8016

Authors

Tadeusz Oleksiak 

Pracownia Ekonomiki Nasiennictwa i Hodowli Roślinm Zakład Nasiennictwa i Nasionoznawstwa, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 59
PDF downloads: 31


License

Copyright (c) 2007 Dariusz R. Mańkowski, Tadeusz Oleksiak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 > >>