Evaluation of selected DNA isolation methods for wheat breeding purposes

Aleksandra Pietrusińska

a.pietrusinska@ihar.edu.pl
Zakład Hodowli i Genetyki Stosowanej, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie (Poland)

Paweł Cz. Czembor


Zakład Fitopatologii, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie (Poland)

Abstract

There are many methods of plant DNA isolation. However, most of them are unacceptable for marker assisted breeding since their procedures are long, complex and expensive. Therefore, we evaluated three methods that could be used in marker assisted selection in wheat breeding: DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen), DNAzol Direct (Molecular Research Center) and alkaline lysis based on NaOH. All isolated DNA were kept in the same conditions. In order to evaluate stability of DNA matrices, they were tested in PCR reaction after one, ten, thirty and forty days of storage. Each DNA sample was amplified in PCR with twelve SSRs (Simple Sequence Repeats). Three DNA isolation methods were assessed based upon number of the amplified PCR products and their intensity after various periods of DNA storage. Besides the reference method DNeasy Plant Mini Kit, the most stable and acceptable results were obtained with fast DNA extraction method based on NaOH. The last method coupled with microsatellite assisted selection seems to be the most reliable and cost effective in breeding programs, whereas DNAzol Direct method gave results different to that described in the literature.


Keywords:

DNA isolation, wheat

Ata-ur Rehman, Raman R., Read B., Raman H. 2001. High throughput DNA isolation method for routine marker assisted selection in barley. Proceedings of the 10th Australian Barley Technical Symposium, 2001.
Google Scholar

Burr K., Harper R., Linacre A. 2001. One-step isolation of plant DNA suitable for PCR amplification. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 19: 367 — 371.
Google Scholar

Caldwell K. S., Dvorak J., Lagudah E. S., Akhunov E., Luo M. C., Wolters P., Powell W. 2004. Sequence polymorphism in polyploid wheat and their D-genome diploid ancestor. Genetics 167: 941 — 947.
Google Scholar

Ching A., Caldwell K., Jung M., Dolan M., Smith O., Tingey S., Morgante M., Rafalski A. J. 2002. SNP frequency, haplotype structure and linkage disequilibrium in elite maize inbred lines. BMC Genetics 3: 19.
Google Scholar

Haymes K. M. 1996. Mini-prep method suitable for a plant breeding program. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 14: 280 — 284.
Google Scholar

Hong J. K., Hwang B. K. 2005. Induction of enhanced disease resistance and oxidative stress tolerance by overexpression of pepper basic PR-1 gene in Arabidopsis. Physiologia Plantarum 124: 267 — 277.
Google Scholar

Hu W. W., Gong H., Pua E. C. 2005. Molecular cloning and characterization of S-adenosyl-methionine decarboxylase genes from mustard (Brassica juncea). Physiologia Plantarum 124: 25.
Google Scholar

Karakousis A., Langridge P. 2003. A high-throughput plant DNA extraction method for marker analysis. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 21: 95a — 95f.
Google Scholar

Koebner R. M. D., Summers R. W. 2003. 21st century wheat breeding: plot selection or plate detection? Trends in Biotechnology 21 (2): 59 — 63.
Google Scholar

Konishi T., Yasui Y., Ohnishi O. 2005. Orginal birthplace of cultivated common buckwheat inferred from genetic relationships among cultivated populations and natural populations of wild common buckwheat revealed by AFLP analysis. Genes & Genetic Systems 80 (2): 113 — 119.
Google Scholar

Lange D. A., Penuela S., Denny R. L., Mudge J., Concibo V. C., Orf J. H., Young N. D. 1998. A plant DNA isolation protocol suitable for polymerase chain reaction based marker-assisted breeding. Crop Sci. 38: 217 — 220.
Google Scholar

Navajas-Pérez R., Herrán R., González G. L., Jamilena M., Lozano R., Rejón C. R., Rejón M. R., Garrido-Ramos M. A. 2005. The evolution of reproductive systems and sex-determining mechanisms within Rumex (Polygonaceae) inferred from nuclear and chloroplastidial sequence data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22 (9):1929 — 1939.
Google Scholar

Paris M., Carter M. 2000. Cereal DNA: A rapid high-throughput extraction method for marker assisted selection. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 18: 357 — 360.
Google Scholar

Peist R., Hansel D., Twieling G., Löffert D. 2001. PCR inhibitors in plant DNA preparations. QIAGEN News 3: 7 — 9.
Google Scholar

Peng J., Korol A. B., Fahima T., Röder S., Ronin Y. I., Li Y. C., Nevo E. 2000. Molecular genetic maps in wild emmer wheat, Triticum dicoccoides: genome-wide coverage, massive negative interference, and putative quasi-linkage. Genome Res. 10: 1509 — 1531.
Google Scholar

Pestsova E., Ganal M. W., Röder M. S. 2000. Isolation and mapping of microsatellite markers specific for the D genome of bread wheat. Genome 43: 689 — 697.
Google Scholar

Post R., Post L., Dayteg C., Nilsson M., Forster B. P., Tuvesson S. 2003. A high-throughput DNA extraction method for barley seed. Euphytica 130: 255 — 260.
Google Scholar

Ribaut J. M., Hoisington D. 1998. Marker-assisted selection: new tools and strategies. Trends in Plant Science 3(6): 236 — 239.
Google Scholar

Röder M. S., Korzun V., Wendehake K., Plaschke J., Tixier M. H., Leroy P., Ganal M. W. 1998. A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149: 2007 — 2023.
Google Scholar

Rudnóy S., Bratek Z., Páldi E., Rácz I., Lásztity D. 2002. FLC-like factors in wheat (cv. Mv15) and Conyza sp. Proceedings of the 7th Hungarian Congress on Plant Physiology.
Google Scholar

Somers D. J., Isaac P., Edwards K. 2004. A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 1105 — 1114.
Google Scholar

Song Q. J., Shi J. R., Singh S., Fickus E. W., Costa J. M., Lewis J., Gill B. S., Ward R., Cregan P. B. 2005. Development and mapping of microsatellite (SSR) markers in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 110: 550 — 560.
Google Scholar

Stein N., Herren G., Keller B. 2001. A new DNA extraction method for high-throughput marker analysis in a large-genome species such as Triticum aestivum. Plant Breeding 120: 354 — 356.
Google Scholar

Thompson D., Henry R. 1995. Single-step protocol for preparation of plant tissues for analysis by PCR. Biotechniques 19: 394 — 400.
Google Scholar

Tuvesson S. L. v Post, Öhlund R., Hagberg P., Graner A., Svitashev S., Schehr M. & Elovsson. 1998. Molecular breeding for the BaMMV/BaYMV resistance gene ym4 in winter barley. Plant Breed. 117: 19 — 22.
Google Scholar

Wang H., Qi M., Cutler A. J. 1993. A simple method of preparing plant samples for PCR. Nucleic Acids Research 21 (17): 4153 — 4154.
Google Scholar

Warner P., Karakousis A., Schiemann A., Eglinton J., Langridge P., Barr A. 2001. An investigation of a rapid DNA extraction method for routine MAS in the S.A. Barley Improvement Program. Proceedings of the 10th Australian Barley Technical Symposium.
Google Scholar

Werner O., Ros M. R., Guerra J. 2002. Direct amplification and NaOH extraction: two rapid and simple methods preparing bryophyte DNA for polymerase chain reaction (PCR). J. Bryology 24: 127 — 131.
Google Scholar

Yamane K., Kawahara T. 2005. Intra- and interspecific phylogenetic relationships among diploid Triticum-Aegilops species (Poaceae) based on base-pair substitutions, indels, and microsatellites in chloroplast noncoding sequences. Am. J. Botany 92(11): 1887 — 1898.
Google Scholar


Published
2007-06-29

Cited by

Pietrusińska, A. and Czembor, P. C. (2007) “Evaluation of selected DNA isolation methods for wheat breeding purposes”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (244), pp. 59–68. doi: 10.37317/biul-2007-0045.

Authors

Aleksandra Pietrusińska 
a.pietrusinska@ihar.edu.pl
Zakład Hodowli i Genetyki Stosowanej, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie Poland

Authors

Paweł Cz. Czembor 

Zakład Fitopatologii, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 96
PDF downloads: 56


License

Copyright (c) 2007 Aleksandra Pietrusińska, Paweł Cz. Czembor

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2