Analysis of the lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) collection in respect of some morphological and yield structure characters

Renata Galek

kghrin@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Honorata Kalińska


Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Ewa Sawicka-Sienkiewicz


Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Abstract

Investigation covered 15 breeding lines and varieties of Lupinus angustifolius, 7 of which belonging to the group of the “epigonal” determinated type of growth (LAE-1, LAE-2, R/24/99, R 108/99, R 170, Sonet, Wersal) and 8 characterized by the “traditional”, non-determinate type of growth (LAG-24, Ród 451, Boruta, Baron, Elff, Mulat, Zeus, Graf). Field experiments were established in 2003 and 2004 by the randomized blocks method in 3 replications. The following characters of the main stem and lateral branches were evaluated: length of inflorescence (cm), number of flowers, and number of pods. Fertility index (%) was calculated as a ratio of the number of pods harvested to the number of developed flowers. Also, the weight of seeds per plant (g) and the weight of 1000 seeds (g) were analyzed. Variance analysis revealed significant differentiation in all characters studied. The variety Boruta developed the longest inflorescence (25 cm), but the longest (8 cm) inflorescence on lateral branches appeared in the variety Baron. The highest number of flowers in the main stem inflorescence is yielded by the varieties Boruta and Sonet and the breeding line LAE-1, whereas the variety Zeus formed only 17 flowers. The number of flowers on lateral branches differed considerably: the variety Graf and the variety Baron showed the lowest (6) and the highest (10) values respectively. The determinate genotypes: LAE-2-2 and Wersal, as well as the traditional LAG-24, showed the most suitable fertility index for the main stem. The breeding line LAG-24 was distinguishable by a high value of the weight of 1000 seeds (180 g), but this line and also Ród 451 had the lowest weight of seeds per plant (14–15 g).

 

Keywords:

Lupinus angustifolius, lupin, cultivars, breeding lines, morphological traits, yield structure characters

Bieniaszewski T., Fordoński G., Lahuta L., Krzebietke S., Żarczyński P. 2003. Wpływ poziomu wilgotności gleby na wzrost i plonowanie tradycyjnych i samokończących form łubinu żółtego. ZPPNR z. 495: 95 — 119.
Google Scholar

Borowska M., Prusiński J. 2003. Zastosowanie auksyny i ekolistu w uprawie łubinu białego. Streszczenia, Międzynarodowa Konferencja „Łubin — wysokobiałkowa roślina XXI wieku”. Kudowa Zdrój, 22–25 września 2003: 11.
Google Scholar

Galek R., Sawicka-Sienkiewicz E., Stawiński St., Kalińska H., Maniukiewicz P. 2004. Wstępna ocena płodności wybranych odmian i rodów Lupinus angustifolius. Genetyka w ulepszaniu roślin uprawnych, pod redakcją P. Krajewskiego, Z. Zwierzykowskiego, P. Kachlickiego, Rozprawy i Monografie Nr 11, IGR PAN w Poznaniu, 2004: 395 — 402.
Google Scholar

Kotecki A., Jasińska Z. 1999. Szczegółowa uprawa roślin. Praca zbiorowa pod redakcją Z. Jasińskiej i A Koteckiego. T. 2. Wydawnictwo Akademii Rolniczej we Wrocławiu.
Google Scholar

Mackiewicz H. 1958. Żywotność pyłku u trzech gatunków łubinów. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych. T. 79 — A — 1:103 — 110.
Google Scholar

NijakiT., Nijaki J., Czerwińska A. 1999. Postęp w hodowli łubinu żółtego i wąskolistnego: Proceedings of the International Conference „Lupin in Polish and European Agriculture” Przysiek 2–3 September, Poland. (eds) J. Prusiński: 153 — 158.
Google Scholar

Pate J. S., Emery R. J. N, Atkins C. A. 1998.Transport, physiology and partitioning. In: Lupin as crop plants. Biology, production and utilization. (eds) J.S. Gladstones, C.A. Atkins J. Hamblin CAB International: 181 — 226.
Google Scholar

Podsiadło C., Karczmarczyk S. 2002. Ocena wpływu deszczowania i nawożenia mineralnego na plonowanie i zachwaszczenie łubinu wąskolistnego. ZPPNR z. 495:191 — 200.
Google Scholar

Prusiński J., Borowska M. 2002. Potencjał biologiczny roślin strączkowych i jego wykorzystanie cz. I. Zastosowanie regulatorów wzrostu w uprawie roślin strączkowych. Hodowla Roślin i Nasiennictwo 2/2002: 16 — 25.
Google Scholar

Prusiński J., Borowska M. 2003. Potencjał biologiczny roślin strączkowych i jego wykorzystanie cz. II. Dolistne dokarmianie roślin strączkowych. Hodowla Roślin i Nasiennictwo 1/2003: 8 — 13.
Google Scholar

Sienkiewicz S., Żarczyński P., Wierzbowska J., Krzebietke S. 2003. Wpływ nawożenia makroskładnikami na plony nasion, białka i tłuszczu oraz niektóre cechy morfologiczne dwóch odmian łubinu białego. ZPPNR z. 495: 231 — 236.
Google Scholar

Święcicki W., Święcicki W.K., Wiatr K. 1997. Historia, współczesne osiągnięcia i perspektywy hodowli roślin strączkowych w Polsce. ZPPNR 446: 15 — 32.
Google Scholar

www.hrsmolice.republika.pl
Google Scholar


Published
2006-09-29

Cited by

Galek, R., Kalińska, H. and Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E. (2006) “Analysis of the lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) collection in respect of some morphological and yield structure characters”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (240/241), pp. 243–252. doi: 10.37317/biul-2006-0058.

Authors

Renata Galek 
kghrin@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Honorata Kalińska 

Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Ewa Sawicka-Sienkiewicz 

Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 12
PDF downloads: 8


License

Copyright (c) 2006 Renata Galek, Honorata Kalińska, Ewa Sawicka-Sienkiewicz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.