The effectiveness of different fungicides containing mancozeb in reducing development of early blight in field and laboratory investigations

Jerzy Osowski

j.osowski@ihar.edu.pl
Zakład Nasiennictwa i Ochrony Ziemniaka w Boninie, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie (Poland)

Abstract

In the years 1999 and 2001–2003, the efficiency of different fungicides in controlling early blight was evaluated in field and laboratory experiments. Two contact fungicides: mancozeb (Dithane NeoTec 75 WG and zoxamide + mancozeb (Unikat 75 WG), a translaminar fungicide fenamidon + mancozeb (Pyton 60 WG) and a systemic fungicide metalaxyl M + mancozeb (Ridomil Gold MZ 68 WG) were compared. The results showed that all tested fungicides significantly reduced early blight development in the field trials. The control of early blight resulted in the increase of potato yield by 4.8 t/ha (metalaxyl M + mancozeb) to 6.2 t/ha (zoxamide + mancozeb). In the laboratory experiments only mancozeb and fenamidon reduced the development of Alternaria alternata fungus.

 

Keywords:

Alternaria solani, Alternaria alternata, active ingredient, early blight, chemical control

Borecki Z. 1987. Nauka o chorobach roślin. PWRiL, Warszawa: 306 — 307.
Google Scholar

Broggio M., Ranucci A. 1991. A comparison of two infection methods for potato early blight (Alternaria solani Sorauer). Adv. Hort. Sci. 5: 18 — 22.
Google Scholar

Christ B. J. 1990. Influence of potato cultivars on the effectiveness of fungicide control of early blight. Am. Potato J. 67/ 7: 419 — 425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03044510
Google Scholar

Christ B. J., Maczuga S. A. 1989 The effect of fungicide schedules and inoculum levels on early blight severity and yield of potato. Plant Disease 73/ 8: 695 — 698. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-73-0695
Google Scholar

Denner F. D. N., Theron D. J. 1999. Voorkoms en beheer van swamsiektes by aartappels. In: Handleiding vir aartappelverbouing in South-Africa. Steyn, P. J. (Ed.) Agricultural Research Council, Roodeplaat, Pretoria: 117 — 132.
Google Scholar

Fry W. E. 1994 Role of early and late blight suppression in potato pest management. p. 166 — 177. In: Advances in Potato Pest Biology and Management. G. W. Zehnder, M. L. Powelson, R. K. Jansson, K. V. Raman (eds.). APS Press. The American Phytopathology Society St. Paul, Minnesota, USA: 655 pp.
Google Scholar

Harrison M. D. 1974. Interactions between foliar sprays and soil fumigation in yield responses of potatoes. Phytopathology 64: 860-864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-64-860
Google Scholar

Holm A. L. 2002. Early blight www.ndsu.nodak.edu/instruct/gudmesta/lateblight1/blight1.html.
Google Scholar

Johnson K. B., Teng P. S. 1990. Coupling a disease progress model for early blight to a model potato growth. Phytopathology, 80: 4, 416-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-80-416
Google Scholar

Kapsa J., Osowski J. 2003. Efficacy of some selected fungicides against early blight (Alternaria spp.) on potato crops. J. Plant Protection Research 43, No. 2: 113 — 120.
Google Scholar

Khan A. M., Rashid A., Jawed Iqubal M. 2003. Evaluation of foliar applied fungicides against early blight of potato under field conditions. Intern. J. Agric. Biol. vol. 5, No 4: 543 — 544.
Google Scholar

Osowski J. 2000. Możliwości zwalczania alternariozy Alternaria spp. w badaniach laboratoryjnych i polowych. W: Ochrona Ziemniaka. Konferencja Naukowa, Kołobrzeg 4–5 kwietnia 2000: 37 — 41.
Google Scholar

Osowski J. 2001. Potrzeba i możliwości zwalczania alternariozy. Ziemniak Pol. 2: 19 — 22.
Google Scholar

Osowski J. 2003. Effectiveness of some chemical strategy protection of potato against early blight (Alternaria solani). J. Plant Protection Research 43, 4: 361 — 368.
Google Scholar

Rotem J. 1981. Fungal diseases of potato and tomato in the Negev. Plant Disease 65: 315 — 318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-65-315
Google Scholar

Stewart H. E., Bradshaw J. E. 1993. A glasshouse test for assessing resistance to early blight (Alternaria solani). Potato Research 36: 1: 35 — 42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02359832
Google Scholar

Sthienberg D., Blachinsky D., Kremer Y., Ben-Hador G., Dinoor A. 1995. Integration of genotype and age-related resistances to reduce fungicide use in management of Alternaria diseases of cotton and potato. Phytopathology, 85, 9: 995 — 1002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-85-995
Google Scholar

Sthienberg D., Raposo R., Bergeron S. N., Legard D. E., Dyer A. T., Fry W. E. 1994. Incorporation of cultivar resistance in a reduced-sprays strategy to suppress early and late blights on potato. Plant Disease 78, 1: 23 — 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-78-0023
Google Scholar

Wnękowski S., Błaszczak W. 1997. Choroby ziemniaka. W: Ochrona Roślin. Red. Kochman J., Węgorek W. Plantpress, Kraków: 505 — 535.
Google Scholar

Zalecenia Ochrony Roślin na lata 2002/03. 2001. IOR Poznań, t. 2: 327.
Google Scholar


Published
2004-09-30

Cited by

Osowski, J. (2004) “The effectiveness of different fungicides containing mancozeb in reducing development of early blight in field and laboratory investigations”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (233), pp. 295–302. doi: 10.37317/biul-2004-0058.

Authors

Jerzy Osowski 
j.osowski@ihar.edu.pl
Zakład Nasiennictwa i Ochrony Ziemniaka w Boninie, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 82
PDF downloads: 27


License

Copyright (c) 2004 Jerzy Osowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>