An empirical comparison of sequential yield component analysis and single path analysis for winter triticale grain yield and its components

Wiesław Mądry

wieslaw_madry@sggw.edu.pl
Katedra Statystyki Matematycznej i Doświadczalnictwa SGGW, Warszawa (Poland)

Zbigniew Laudański


Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie (Poland)

Marcin Kozak


Katedra Statystyki Matematycznej i Doświadczalnictwa SGGW, Warszawa (Poland)

Jan Rozbicki


Katedra Agronomii SGGW, Warszawa (Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the paper was to present results of comparative studies on evaluation of grain yield determination of winter triticale by its multiplicative components (number of ears per unit area, average number of grains per ear and average grain weight) when using sequential yield components analysis (SYCA) and single path analysis. In the studies, data were used from a 28 factorial experiment. The results of the investigation confirm and illustrate a better agreement between estimates of path coefficients, as measures of influence of the yield-related traits on yield, for the components forming in more advanced stages of ontogenesis. Such an empirically confirmed, close agreement of effects of yield components on yield, found when using the both methods, may not repeat in cases when the yield-related traits are stronger correlated. In the presented example the yield components were weakly correlated.


Keywords:

grain yield, single path analysis, sequential development of yield components, sequential yield component analysis (SYCA), winter triticale, yield components

Campbell D. C., Kondra Z. P. 1978. Relationships among growth patterns, yield components and yield in rapeseed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58: 87 — 93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps78-016
Google Scholar

Draper N. R., Smith H. 1973. Analiza regresji stosowana. PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Eaton G. W., Bowen P. A., Jolliffe P. A. 1986. Two-dimensional partitioning of yield variation. HortScience, 21: 1052 — 1053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.21.4.1052
Google Scholar

Eaton G. W., Kyte T. R. 1978. Yield component analysis in strawberry. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 103: 578 — 583. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.103.5.578
Google Scholar

Eaton G. W., MacPherson E. A. 1978. Morphological components of yield in cranberry. Hort. Res. 17: 73 — 82.
Google Scholar

Elandt R. 1964. Statystyka matematyczna w zastosowaniu do doświadczalnictwa rolniczego. PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Fraser J., Eaton G. W. 1983. Applications of yield component analysis to crop research. Field Crop Abstracts, 36: 787 — 796.
Google Scholar

Gierdziewicz M., Zając T. 1999. Porównanie metod szacowania siły związku między plonem ziarna pszenżyta ozimego a jego elementami strukturalnymi. Pamiętnik Puławski. Materiały Konferencji, 114: 111 — 118.
Google Scholar

Gołaszewski J. 1996. A method of yield component analysis. Listy Biometryczne 33: 79 — 88.
Google Scholar

Gołaszewski J., Idźkowska M., Milewska J., Koczowska I., Kosiorek A. 2000. Analiza komponentów plonowania roślin uprawnych. Fragm. Agron. 68: 15 — 27.
Google Scholar

Guler M., Adak M. S., Ulukan H. 2001. Determining relationships among yield and some yield components using path analysis in chickpea. Europ. J. Agron. 14: 161 — 166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(00)00086-1
Google Scholar

Jolliffe P. A., Eaton G. W., Lovett Doust J. 1982. Sequential analysis of plant growth. New Phytologist 92: 287 — 296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1982.tb03387.x
Google Scholar

Kang K. M., Seneta E. 1980. Path analysis: An exposition. Developments in statistics, (ed.) Krishnaiah P. R., Amsterdam: 217 — 245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-426603-2.50010-5
Google Scholar

Kozak M. 2002. Statystyczna analiza uwarunkowania zmienności plonu roślin przez jego składowe. Praca doktorska, SGGW, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Mądry W., Rozbicki J., Wyszyński Z. 1995. Planowanie doświadczeń czynnikowych 2k w 2k blokach niekompletnych oraz analiza statystyczna wyników. Rocz. Nauk Rol. Seria A, 111: 57 — 71.
Google Scholar

Mądry W., Kozak M. 2000. Analiza ścieżek i sekwencyjna analiza plonu w badaniach zależności plonu od cech łanu. Cz. I. Opis metod. Rocz. Nauk Rol., Seria A, 115: 143 — 157.
Google Scholar

Mądry W., Kozak M., Rozbicki J. 2000. Analiza ścieżek i sekwencyjna analiza plonu w badaniach zależności plonu od cech łanu. Część II. Zastosowanie metod i porównanie wyników dla pszenżyta ozimego. Rocz. Nauk. Rol., Seria A, 115: 159 — 172.
Google Scholar

Mądry W., Pietrzykowski R., Rozbicki J. 1995. Analiza współczynników ścieżek dla cech rozwijających się w trakcie ontogenezy oraz plonu ziarna pszenżyta ozimego. Rocz. Nauk Rol., Seria A, 111: 9 — 21.
Google Scholar

Mohammadi S. A., Prasanna S. A., Singh N. N. 2003. Sequential path model for determining interrelationships among grain yield and related characters in maize. Crop Sci. 43: 1690 — 1697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2003.1690
Google Scholar

Neter J., Wasserman W., Kutner M. H. 1990. Applied linear statistical models. Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs. IRWIN, New York.
Google Scholar

Ranga Rao V., Ramachandram M. 1977. An analysis of association of components of yield and oil in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Theor. Appl. Gen. 50: 185 — 191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00277740
Google Scholar

Rasmusson D. C., Cannell R. Q. 1970. Selection for grain yield and components of yield in barley. Crop Sci., 10: 51 — 54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183X001000010020x
Google Scholar

Rozbicki J. 1997. Agrotechniczne uwarunkowania wzrostu, rozwoju i plonowania pszenżyta ozimego. Rozprawa habilitacyjna. Fundacja Rozwój SGGW, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Wójcik A. R., Laudański Z. 1989. Planowanie i wnioskowanie statystyczne w doświadczalnictwie. PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Wright S. 1934. The method of path coefficients. Annals of Math. Stat. 5: 161 — 215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177732676
Google Scholar

Wright S. 1960. Path coefficients and path regressions: alternative or complementary concepts? Biometrics, 16: 423 — 445. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2527693
Google Scholar

Zieliński W. 1998. Analiza regresji. Fundacja „Rozwój SGGW”, Warszawa.
Google Scholar


Published
2003-12-31

Cited by

Mądry, W. (2003) “An empirical comparison of sequential yield component analysis and single path analysis for winter triticale grain yield and its components”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (230), pp. 147–156. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0016.

Authors

Wiesław Mądry 
wieslaw_madry@sggw.edu.pl
Katedra Statystyki Matematycznej i Doświadczalnictwa SGGW, Warszawa Poland

Authors

Zbigniew Laudański 

Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie Poland

Authors

Marcin Kozak 

Katedra Statystyki Matematycznej i Doświadczalnictwa SGGW, Warszawa Poland

Authors

Jan Rozbicki 

Katedra Agronomii SGGW, Warszawa Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 228
PDF downloads: 22


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Wiesław Mądry, Zbigniew Laudański, Marcin Kozak, Jan Rozbicki

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >>