The changes of floristic composition in turfgrass mixtures depending on cultivar components of a mixture

Elwira Stawiska

iaipr@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Łąkarstwa i Kształtowania Terenów Zieleni, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Sławomir Prończuk


Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie (Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine floristic changes in composition of species and cultivars mixtures during the first and the second year of turf maintenance. 12 cultivars of Lolium perenne L., Festuca rubra L. ssp. commutata Gaud, Festuca rubra L. ssp. rubra Huck. and Poa pratensis L. were tested in the mixtures. The following percentage ratio of species: L. perenne — 40%, F. rubra spp — 40% and P. pratensis — 20% were used for mixture. The tested cultivar was the only representative of its species, while each of the remaining species was represented by several cultivars. The samples of plants coming from the turf mixtures were collected in the fall of the sowing year, as well as in all the vegetation seasons in the next year of maintenance The botanical-weight analysis of samples was done and the changes in their floristic composition were determined. The preliminary study proved that the changes in floristic composition of turf significantly depended on a species and occasionally also on cultivar components used in the mixtures. During the period of two years of turf maintenance Lolium perenne L. was the dominant species in the mixtures and its percentage ranged above the sowing norm, Festuca rubra L. occurred in turf on the sowing norm level, while Poa pratensis L. was classified below the sowing norm. In the second year of turf maintenance significant changes in the turf components were recorded. The share of L. perenne was decreased while those for F. rubra and P. pratensis were increased. There were also differences in cultivars ratio in turf mixtures observed in particular seasons of the year (spring, summer, autumn). The differences were significant for cultivars of Festuca rubra, and not significant for cultivars of Lolium perrenne and Poa pratensis.

 

Keywords:

Festuca rubra ssp. commutata, Festuca rubra ssp. rubra, Lolium perenne, Poa pratensis, floristic changes, mixtures, turfgrasses, turf maintenance

Brzywczy-Kunińska Z., Rutkowska B. 1969. Trawniki. Zakładanie i pielęgnowanie. PWRiL, Warszawa: 183 ss.
Google Scholar

Brede A. D., Duich J. M. 1984. Establishment characteristics of Kentucky Bluegrass-Perennial Ryegrass turf mixtures as affected by seeding rate and ratio. Agron. J. 76: 875 — 879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600060004x
Google Scholar

Czarnecki Z. 2001. Zmiany składu gatunkowego runi polskich i zagranicznych mieszanek traw gazonowych. Zeszyty Prob. Post. Nauk Rol. 474: 123 — 129.
Google Scholar

Domański P. 1995. Trawy darniowe: kostrzewa czerwona, kostrzewa owcza, mietlica pospolita, wiechlina łąkowa, życica trwała. Synteza wyników doświadczeń odmianowych. Seria 1991. COBORU Słupia Wielka, 1058: 1 — 18.
Google Scholar

Domański P. 1998. Trawy darniowe: kostrzewa czerwona, wiechlina łąkowa, życica trwała. Synteza wyników doświadczeń odmianowych. Seria 1994. COBORU Słupia Wielka, 1136: 1 — 21.
Google Scholar

Domański P. 2002. Gatunki i odmiany w mieszankach na trawniki i boiska sportowe. Przegląd Naukowy Inż. i Kszt. Środ., Rocznik XI, 1 (24): 83 — 91.
Google Scholar

Grabowski K., Grzegorczyk S., Benedycki S., Kwietniewski H. 1999 a. Ocena wartości użytkowej wybranych gatunków i odmian traw gazonowych do obsiewu nawierzchni trawiastych. Fol. Univ. Agric. Stetin 197, Agricultura (75): 81 — 88.
Google Scholar

Grabowski K., Grzegorczyk S., Benedycki S., Kwietniewski H. 1999 b. Przydatność gatunków i odmian traw gazonowych do obsiewu trawników rekreacyjnych. Fol. Univ. Agric. Stetin 197, Agricultura (75): 89 — 92.
Google Scholar

Harkot W., Czarnecki Z. 1999. Przydatność polskich odmian traw gazonowych do zadarniania powierzchni w trudnych warunkach glebowych. Fol. Univ. Agric. Stetin. 197, Agricultura 75: 117 — 120.
Google Scholar

Hunt K. L., Dunn J. H. 1993. Compatibility of Kentucky Bluegrass and Perennial Ryegrass with Tall Fescue in transition zone turfgrass mixtures. Agron. J. 85: 211 — 215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500020009x
Google Scholar

Jankowski K., Ciepiela G. A., Jodełka J., Kolczarek R. 1999. Analiza porównawcza mieszanek gazonowych uprawianych w warunkach Podlasia. Fol. Univ. Agric. Stetin 197, Agricultura (75): 133 — 140.
Google Scholar

Lutyńska R. 1993. Prace hodowlane i badania nad gatunkami traw z rodzaju Festuca L. Biul. IHAR 188: 5 — 12.
Google Scholar

Pawluśkiewicz B. 2002. Tworzenie zadarnień wzmocnionych kratką Grass-Paver z wykorzystaniem polskich i zagranicznych odmian traw gazonowych. Przegląd Naukowy Inż. i Kszt. Środ., Rocznik XI, 1 (24): 190 — 201.
Google Scholar

Rutkowska B., Brzywczy-Kunińska Z. 1969. Badania odmian i ekotypów gatunków traw przydatnych dla potrzeb miejskich. Zesz. Prob.. Post. Nauk Rol. 90: 67 — 71.
Google Scholar

Rutkowska B., Pawluśkiewicz P. 1996. Trawniki — Poradnik. PWRiL, Warszawa.
Google Scholar


Published
2003-03-31

Cited by

Stawiska, E. and Prończuk, S. (2003) “The changes of floristic composition in turfgrass mixtures depending on cultivar components of a mixture”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (225), pp. 313–319. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0218.

Authors

Elwira Stawiska 
iaipr@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Łąkarstwa i Kształtowania Terenów Zieleni, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Sławomir Prończuk 

Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 47
PDF downloads: 24


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Elwira Stawiska, Sławomir Prończuk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)