Usefulness of different input level environments in selection of winter wheat

Tadeusz Drzazga

nasiona@mhr.com.pl
Małopolska Hodowla Roślin HBP — Oddział Nasiona Kobierzyc (Poland)

Paweł Krajewski


Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN w Poznaniu (Poland)

Ewa Śmiałek


COBORU — Stacja Oceny Odmian Zybiszów (Poland)

Abstract

Introduction of varying agronomic treatments into breeding experiments calls for the choice of a selection strategy which takes into account the production systems. Decisions concerning direct or indirect selection depend on the genetic correlation and on the heritability of the traits. To assess the selection efficiency, we used yield data from 2005–2009 PDO experiments performed at two agronomic levels: standard and intensive (with full protection and additional N fertilization). For both levels, we estimated phenotypic variances, repeatability coefficients, phenotypic and genotypic variation coefficients and stress degree coefficients. The computed genetic correlation coefficients were relatively variable (from 0.60 to 0.97). The obtained results concerning selection efficiency indicated some possibilities of the effective selection at two levels of agronomic treatments.


Keywords:

indirect selection, variance components, broad-sense heritability, stress intensity, variety breeding

Atlin G. N., Frey K. J. 1989. Predicting the relative effectiveness of direct versus indirect selection for oat yield in three types of stress environments. Euphytica 44: 137 — 142.
Google Scholar

Atlin G. N., Frey K. J. 1990. Selecting oat lines for yield in low productivity environments. Crop Sci. 30: 556 — 561.
Google Scholar

Atlin, G. N., Cooper M., Bjørnstad F. A. 2001. A comparison of formal and participatory breeding approaches using selection theory. Euphytica 122: 463 — 475.
Google Scholar

Annicchiarico, P., Bellah, F., Chiari, T. 2005. Defining subregions and estimating benefits for a specific-adaptation strategy by breeding programs: a case study. Crop Sci. 45: 1741 — 1749.
Google Scholar

Annicchiarico, P., Chiapparino, E., Perenzin M. 2010. Response of common wheat varieties to organic and conventional production systems across Italian locations, and implications for selection. Field Crops Research 116: 230 — 238.
Google Scholar

Brancourt-Hulmel M., Heumez E., Pluchard P., Beghin D., Depatureaux C., Giraud A., Le Gouis J. 2005. Indirect versus direct selection of winter wheat for low-input or high-input levels. Crop Science. 45: 1427 — 1431.
Google Scholar

Banziger, M., Betran F. J., Lafitte H. R. 1997 a. Efficiency of high-nitrogen selection environments for improving maize for low-nitrogen target environments. Crop Sci. 37: 1103 — 1109.
Google Scholar

Burger H., Schloen M., Schmidt W., Geiger H. H. 2008. Quantitative genetic studies on breeding maize for adaptation to organic farming. Euphytica 163: 501 — 510.
Google Scholar

Ceccarelli S. 1994. Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions. Euphytica 77: 205 — 219.
Google Scholar

Ceccarelli S. 1996. Adaptation to low/high input conditions. Euphytica 92: 203 — 214.
Google Scholar

Ceccarelli S., Grando S., Impiglia A. 1998. Choice of selection strategy in breeding barley for stress environments. Euphytica 103: 307 — 318.
Google Scholar

Cooper M., Rajatasereekul S., Somrith B., Sriwisut S., Immark S., Boonwite C., Suwanwongse A., Ruangsook S., Hanviriyapant P., Romyen P., Porn-uraisanit P., Skulkhu E., Fukai S., Basnayake J., Podlich D. W. 1999. Rainfed lowland rice breeding strategies for Northeast Thailand II. Comparison of intrastation and interstation selection. Field Crop Res. 64: 153 — 176.
Google Scholar

Fukai S., Inthapanya P., Blamey F. B. C., Khuntasuvon S. 1999. Genotypic variation in rice grown in low fertile soils and drought-prone, rainfed lowland environments. Field Crops Res. 64: 121 — 130.
Google Scholar

Falconer, D. S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, third ed. Longman, London.
Google Scholar

Falconer, D.S., Mackay T. F. C. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th ed. Longman, Harlow, London.
Google Scholar

Gauch H. G., Zobel R.W. 1997. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes Crop Sci. 37: 311 — 326.
Google Scholar

Hill J., Becker H. C., Tigerstedt P. M. A. 1998. Quantitative and ecological aspects of plant breeding. Champan & Hall, London, UK.
Google Scholar

Kumar A., Bernier, J., Verulkar S. B., Lafitte H. R., Atlin G. N. 2008. Breeding for drought tolerance: direct selection for yield, response to selection and use of drought-tolerant donors in upland and lowland-adapted populations. Field Crops Res. 107: 221 — 231.
Google Scholar

Lorenzana E. R., Bernardo R. 2008. Genetic correlation between corn performance in organic and conventional production systems Crop Sci. 48: 903 — 910.
Google Scholar

Murphy K. M., Campbell K. G., Lyon S. R., Jones S. S. 2007. Evidence of varietal adaptation to organic farming systems. Field Crops Res. 102: 172 — 177.
Google Scholar

Padi F. K. 2004. Relationship between stress tolerance and grain yield stability in cowpea. Journal of Agricultural Science. 142: 431 — 443.
Google Scholar

Przystalski M., Osman A., Thiemt E. M., Rolland B., Ericson L., Ostergard H., Levy L., Wolfe M., Buchse A., Piepho H. P., Krajewski P. 2008. Comparing the performance of cereal varieties in organic and non-organic cropping systems in different European countries. Euphytica 163: 417 — 433.
Google Scholar

Sinebo W., Gretzmacher R., Edelbauer A. 2002. Environment of selection for grain yield in low fertilizer input barley. Field Crops Res. 74: 151 — 162.
Google Scholar

van Eeuwijk F. A., Cooper M., DeLacy I. H., Ceccarelli S., Grando S. 2001. A vocabulary and grammar for comparing PPB and FPB trials. Euphytica 122: 470 — 490.
Google Scholar

Verulkar S. B., Mandal N. P., Dwivedi J. L., Singh B. N., Sinha P. K, Mahato R. N, Dongre P., Singh O. N., Bose L. K., Swain P., Robin S., Chandrababu R., Senthil S., Jain A., Shashidhar H. E., Hittalmani S., Vera Cruz C., Paris T., Raman A., Haefele S., Serraj R., Atlin G., Kumar A. 2010. Breeding resilient and productive genotypes adapted to drought-prone rainfed ecosystem of India. Field Crops Research 117: 197 — 208.
Google Scholar

Ud-Din N., Carver B. F., Clutter A. C. 1992. Genetic analysis and selection for wheat yield in drought-stressed and irrigated environments. Euphytica 62: 89 — 96.
Google Scholar

Ukalski K., Ukalska J., Śmiałowski T., Mądry W. 2008. Badanie zmienności i współzależności cech użytkowych w kolekcji roboczej pszenicy ozimej (Triticum aestivum L.) za pomocą metod wielowymiarowych. Część I. Korelacje fenotypowe i genotypowe. Biul. IHAR 249: 35 — 43.
Google Scholar


Published
2013-12-31

Cited by

Drzazga, T., Krajewski, P. and Śmiałek, E. (2013) “Usefulness of different input level environments in selection of winter wheat ”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (270), pp. 3–15. doi: 10.37317/biul-2013-0001.

Authors

Tadeusz Drzazga 
nasiona@mhr.com.pl
Małopolska Hodowla Roślin HBP — Oddział Nasiona Kobierzyc Poland

Authors

Paweł Krajewski 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Ewa Śmiałek 

COBORU — Stacja Oceny Odmian Zybiszów Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 80
PDF downloads: 55


License

Copyright (c) 2013 Tadeusz Drzazga, Paweł Krajewski, Ewa Śmiałek

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>