Evaluation of yield stability of winter oilseed rape cultivars on the basis of post-registration variety testing system in diversified soils and climatic conditions in Lower Silesia

Andrzej Latusek

kghrin@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Henryk Bujak


Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Abstract

The paper presents an analysis of genotype-environment interaction and yield stability evaluation of winter oilseed rape. Experimental data were obtained from trials conducted in the years 2008-2010 at the following locations: Krościna Mała, Naroczyce Pawłowice, Tarnów Śląski, Tomaszów Bolesławiecki and Zybiszów. Six population cultivars: Cabriolet, Cadeli, Californium, Casoar, Castille, PR46W10 and four hybrid cultivars: Extend, Nelson, Toccata and Vectra were grown at intensive level of cultivation. Chosen sources of variability: years, locations and genotypes were analyzed in the orthogonal system. The interpretation of the stability of yield was based on multivariate analysis of variance. Statistics stability is a measure of the contribution of each variety in the genotype-environment interaction and it was calculated based on a combination of Shukla’s variance stability (1972) and Kang’s ranks (1988). We found a significant diversity of yield of oilseed rape in the analyzed experiments, and significant interaction between variety and locations and years of research. Detailed analysis has identified interaction effects for hybrid varieties: Extend, Nelson and Toccata, as high-yielding, as evidenced by significantly positive values calculated for the main effects of these varieties. In addition, hybrid variety Nelson gave stable and high yields in all the years of research, it is thus a stable and high-yielding variety.

Supporting Agencies

The work was carried out as part of the National Variety Testing Program coordinated by the Central Research Center for Cultivar Testing. Task co-financed by the European Union under the European Social Fund.

Keywords:

grain yield, variety, winter oilseed rape, yield stability

Bujak H., Jedyński S., Kaczmarek J. 2008 a. Ocena stabilności plonowania odmian żyta ozimego na podstawie parametrycznych i nieparametrycznych metod. Biul. IHAR 250: 189 — 202.
Google Scholar

Bujak H., Jedyński S., Kaczmarek J., Kotecki A. 2008 b. Ocena stabilności plonowania populacyjnych i mieszańcowych odmian rzepaku ozimego. Biul. IHAR 250: 261 — 271.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z., Krajewski P., Siatkowski J. 2003. Podręcznik użytkownika programu Sergen 4. IGR Poznań 2003.
Google Scholar

Eberhart S. A., Russell W. A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36 — 40.
Google Scholar

Główny Urząd Statystyczny (GUS). 2010. Wynikowy szacunek produkcji głównych ziemiopłodów rolnych i ogrodniczych w 2010 roku.
Google Scholar

Kaczmarek J., Kotecki A., Kotowicz L., Weber R. 2003. Interakcja genotypowo-środowiskowa plonowania odmian rzepaku ozimego w doświadczeniach PDO. Biul. IHAR 226/227/2: 395 — 403.
Google Scholar

Kamińska A., Kaczmarek J., Śmiałek E., Kotowicz L. 2010. Wyniki Porejestrowych Doświadczeń Odmianowych na Dolnym Śląsku. Rzepak ozimy 2010 (2008-2010). SDOO Tomaszów Bolesławiecki, 1 (12).
Google Scholar

Kang M. S. 1988. A rank sum method for selecting high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Cereal Res. Commun. 16: 113 — 115.
Google Scholar

Kang M. S. 1998. Using genotype-by-environment interaction for crop cultivar development. Adv. Agron. 35: 199 — 240.
Google Scholar

Kang M. S., Pham H. N. 1991. Simultaneous selection for high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Agron. J. 83: 161 — 165.
Google Scholar

Kotecki A., Kozak M., Malarz W. 2004. Wpływ zróżnicowanego poziomu agrotechniki na rozwój i plonowanie odmian rzepaku ozimego. Rośliny Oleiste-Oilseed Crops XXV: 97 — 108.
Google Scholar

Krajewski P., Kaczmarek Z., Czajka S. 2006. Planowanie i analiza statystyczna doświadczeń hodowlanych. Podręcznik użytkownika programu EKSPLAN wersja 2 (2006).
Google Scholar

Muśnicki Cz., Jerzak M. 1992. Produkcyjne i ekonomiczne skutki uproszczeń w agrotechnice rzepaku ozimego. Rośliny Oleiste-Oilseed Crops XIV (2): 318 — 334.
Google Scholar

Nabugoomu F., Kempton R. A., Talbot M. 1999. Analysis of series of trials where varieties differ in sensitivity to locations. J. Agric. Biol. Env. Stat., Vol. 4, No. 3: 310 — 325.
Google Scholar

Ogrodowczyk M., Liersch A., Bartkowiak-Broda I. 2000. Analiza zmienności składników plonu mieszańców złożonych rzepaku ozimego. Biul. IHAR 216: 483 — 490.
Google Scholar

Shukla G. K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29: 237 — 245.
Google Scholar

Weber R., Karczmarek J., Kotecki A. 2003. Wpływ środowiska na zmienność plonowania odmian rzepaku ozimego w warunkach Dolnego Śląska. Rośliny Oleiste-Oilseed Crops XXIV (2): 395 — 403.
Google Scholar

Wójtowicz M., Czernik-Kołodziej K. 2003. Reakcja zarejestrowanych odmian rzepaku ozimego na poziom agrotechniki. Rośliny Oleiste-Oilseed Crops XXIV (1): 85 — 94.
Google Scholar


Published
2012-09-30

Cited by

Latusek, A. and Bujak, H. (2012) “Evaluation of yield stability of winter oilseed rape cultivars on the basis of post-registration variety testing system in diversified soils and climatic conditions in Lower Silesia”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (265), pp. 59–70. doi: 10.37317/biul-2012-0039.

Authors

Andrzej Latusek 
kghrin@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Henryk Bujak 

Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 86
PDF downloads: 38


License

Copyright (c) 2012 Andrzej Latusek, Henryk Bujak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>