The use of decision support system NegFry to late blight control

Edward Bernat

e.bernat@ihar.edu.pl
Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — PIB, Radzików, Zakład Nasiennictwa i Ochrony Ziemniaka, Bonin (Poland)

Jerzy Osowski


Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — PIB, Radzików, Zakład Nasiennictwa i Ochrony Ziemniaka, Bonin (Poland)

Abstract

The assessment of usefulness of a decision support system (DSS) NegFry for chemical control of late blight (Phytophthora infestans) was carried out at the Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, Department of Potato Protection and Seed Science in Bonin in the years 2007–2008. The DSS NegFry was compared to different potato protection systems. The results obtained show that plant protection performed according to NegFry system significantly restricted late blight development and reduced the number of fungicide treatments by two in comparison to the conventional protection method (7 treatments).


Keywords:

NegFry, chemical protection, decision support system, late blight, potato

Doruchowski G. 2005. Elementy rolnictwa precyzyjnego w ochronie roślin. Inżynieria Rolnicza 6: 131 — 139.
Google Scholar

Fry W. E. 1994. Role of early and late blight suppression in potato pest management. In: Advances in Potato Pest Biology and Management. Zehnder G. W., Powelson M. L., Jansson R. K., Raman K. V. (eds.). The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA: 166 — 177.
Google Scholar

Hansen J. G. 1995. Meteorological dataflow and management for potato late blight forecasting in Denmark. SP Report, Danish Institute of Plant and Soil science, Vol 10: 57–63.
Google Scholar

Hansen J. G., Lassen P., Turka I., Stuogiene L., Valskyte A., Koppel M. 2000. Validation and implementation of a Danish decision support system for the control of potato late blight in the Baltic countries. PAV — Special Report 6/2000. Proc. Workshop on the European Network for Development of an Integrated Control Strategy of Potato Late Blight. Belgium, Ostend 29.09–3.10.1999: 117 — 130
Google Scholar

Henahan S. 2006. The great famine: gone, but not forgotten. Access Excellence @ the National Health Museum. HTML electronic document.
Google Scholar

Hoffman G. M., Schmutterer H. O. 1983. Parasitäre Krankheiten und Schadlinge an landwirtschaftlichen Kulturpflanzen. Verlag Eugen Ulmer. Stuttgart.
Google Scholar

Kapsa J. 2001. Zaraza (Phytophthora infestans /Mont./de Bary) występująca na łodygach ziemniaka. Monogr. i rozpr. nauk. IHAR 11: 1 — 108.
Google Scholar

Kapsa J. 2004. Zmiany stanu zagrożenia i ochrony plantacji przed zarazą (P. infestans) w Polsce na tle krajów europejskich. Progress in Plant Protection. Postępy w Ochronie Roślin, Vol. 44 (1): 129–137.
Google Scholar

Kapsa J., Bernat E., Kasprzak M. 2005. Przydatność systemu decyzyjnego NegFry w ochronie ziemniaka przed zarazą w różnych warunkach meteorologicznych. Biul. IHAR 237/238: 177 — 186.
Google Scholar

Kapsa J., Osowski J., Bernat E. 2003. NegFry — decision support system for late blight control in potato crops — results of validation trials in north Poland. J. Plant Prot. Resch. 43: 171 — 179.
Google Scholar

Lacroix G., Latorse M. P., Mercer R. 2001. Phenomena: A new fungicide for the control potato late blight. PAV-Special Raport No. 7: 91 — 98.
Google Scholar

Nowacki W., Gruczek T., Zarzyńska K. 2004. Produkcja ziemniaków w rolnictwie ekologicznym. Krajowe Centrum Rolnictwa Ekologicznego — Regionalne Centrum Doradztwa Rozwoju Rolnictwa i Obszarów Wiejskich w Radomiu: 40 s.
Google Scholar

Pietkiewicz J. 1972. Badanie odporności ziemniaków na zarazę ziemniaczaną (Phytophthora infestans de Bary) na odciętych liściach. Biul. Inst. Ziemn. 9: 17 — 31.
Google Scholar

Pietkiewicz J. 1989. Zwalczanie zarazy ziemniaka. Instrukcja Upowszechnieniowa 1/89. Instytut Ziemniaka, Bonin: 20 ss.
Google Scholar

Püntener W. 1989. Podręcznik Doświadczalnictwa Polowego w Ochronie Roślin. PWRiL, Warszawa, s. 40.
Google Scholar

Sawicka B., Kapsa J. 2001. Effect of varietal resistance and chemical protection on the potato late blight (Phytophthora infestans [Mont.] de Bary) development. Potato Res. 44 (3): 303–304.
Google Scholar

Van der Plank J. E. 1963. Plant Disease: Epidemics and Control. Academic Press, New York. pp: 345.
Google Scholar

Zaliwski A. S. 2007. Modele zarazy ziemniaka. https://www.dss.iung.pulawy.pl/Documents/ior/blight_models.html.
Google Scholar


Published
2010-06-30

Cited by

Bernat, E. and Osowski, J. (2010) “The use of decision support system NegFry to late blight control”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (256), pp. 153–162. doi: 10.37317/biul-2010-0038.

Authors

Edward Bernat 
e.bernat@ihar.edu.pl
Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — PIB, Radzików, Zakład Nasiennictwa i Ochrony Ziemniaka, Bonin Poland

Authors

Jerzy Osowski 

Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin — PIB, Radzików, Zakład Nasiennictwa i Ochrony Ziemniaka, Bonin Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 98
PDF downloads: 43


License

Copyright (c) 2010 Edward Bernat, Jerzy Osowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>