Assessment of Avena fatua L. intraspecific genetic similarity based on DNA polymorphism

Edyta Paczos-Grzęda

edyta.paczos@up.lublin.pl
Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie (Poland)

Katarzyna Kruk


Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie (Poland)

Sylwia Okoń


Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie (Poland)

Abstract

The level of DNA polymorphism and genetic similarity of Polish and foreign Avena fatua L. ecotypes were studied using the ISSR and REMAP approaches. Nineteen ISSR primers and 20 REMAP primer pairs combinations used for DNA profiling, amplified 238 and 468 fragments, respectively. Polymorphic information content (PIC) values ranged from 0.52 to 0.81 for ISSR and from 0.46 to 0.99 for REMAP. Mean values of PIC for ISSR and REMAP were the same — 0.65. Genetic similarities were estimated using Dice algorithm and cluster analyses were performed using UPGMA method, independently for the two molecular marker techniques. Data obtained with both techniques were relatively high correlated (r = 0.69). Despite of high similarity of dendrograms obtained with ISSR and REMAP methods, some clustering differences were observed. Clustering did not display agreement with geographic region or country of origin. Polish ecotypes showed less diversity than forms originating from the other countries. The results of this study have provided evidence of high intra-species genetic similarity of Avena fatua.

 

Keywords:

Avena fatua L., REMAP, ISSR, genetic similarity

Cavan G., Biss P., Moss S. R. 1998. Herbicide resistance and gene flow in wild oats (Avena fatua and Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana). Ann. Appl. Biol. 133: 207 — 217.
Google Scholar

Chrząstek M., Paczos-Grzęda E. 2003. Analiza molekularna i cytologiczna oraz ocena niektórych cech ilościowych mieszańców międzygatunkowych Avena sativa L. × A. fatua L. Biul. IHAR 230: 387 — 397.
Google Scholar

Comeau A. 1984. Barley yellow dwarf virus resistance in the genus Avena. Euphytica 33: 49 — 55.
Google Scholar

Darmency H., Aujas C. 1992. Genetic diversity for competitive and reproductive ability in wild oats (Avena fatua). Weed Science 40: 215 — 219.
Google Scholar

Falkowski M., Filipek J., Filipek M., Grzyb S., Kozłowski S., Kukułka I., Rudnicka-Sterna W., Rutkowska B., Sulinowski S. 1982. Trawy polskie. Falkowski M (red.). Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne. Warszawa: 131 — 134.
Google Scholar

Fennimore S. A., Nyquist W. E., Shaner G. E., Doerge R. W., Foley M. E. 1999. A genetic model and molecular markers for wild oat (Avena fatua L.) seed dormancy. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99: 711 — 718.
Google Scholar

Frey K. J. 1975. Heritability of groat-protein percentage of hexaploid oats. Crop Sci. 15: 227 — 228.
Google Scholar

Frey K. J. 1986. Genetic resources and their use in oat breeding. Proc. of II. Int. Oat Conf. Aberystwyth. Dordrecht: 7 — 15.
Google Scholar

Kalendar R., Grob T., Souniemi A., Schulman A. H. 1999. IRAP and REMAP: two new retrotransposons based DNA fingerprinting techniques. Theor. Appl. Genet. 98: 740 — 711.
Google Scholar

Kieć J. 2000. Zróżnicowanie morfologiczne, ekologiczne i enzymatyczne gatunku Avena fatua L. występującego na polach Polski południowo-wschodniej. Rozprawa habilitacyjna. Zesz. Nauk. AR. im. Hugona Kołłątaja w Krakowie.
Google Scholar

Leggett J. M. 1992. Oat science and technology. Agronomy monograph no. 33. American Society of Agron. Crop Sci. Soc. of Amer.: 29 — 52.
Google Scholar

Li C. D., Rossnagel B. G., Scoles G. J. 2000. The development of oat microsatellite markers and their use in identifying relationships among Avena species and oat cultivars. Theor. Appl. Genet. 101: 1259 — 1268.
Google Scholar

Li R., Wang S., Duan L., Li Z., Christoffers M. J., Mengistu L. W. 2007. Genetic diversity of wild oat (Avena fatua) populations from China and the United States. Weed Sci. 55: 95 — 101.
Google Scholar

McMullen M. S., Patterson F. L. 1992. Oat cultivar development in the USA and Canada. In oat science and technology. Edited by H.G. Marshall and Sorrells. American Society of Agronomy. Agronomy Monograph No. 33, Madison, Wis., USA, 573 — 612.
Google Scholar

Mengistu L. W., Messersmith C. G., Christoffers M. J. 2005. Genetic diversity of herbicide - resistant and susceptible Avena fatua populations in North Dakota and Minnesota. Weed Res. 45: 413 — 423.
Google Scholar

Milach S. C. K., Rines H. W., Philips R. L., Stuthman D. D., Morikawa T. 1998. Inheritance of a new dwarfing gene in oat. Crop Sci. 38: 356 — 360.
Google Scholar

Milligan B. G. 1992. Plant DNA isolation. In: Molecular analysis of populations: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, UK, 59 — 88.
Google Scholar

Mirza B., Mohammad S., Ahmad M., Fu Y. B. 2007. Genetic diversity in Pakistani populations of Avena fatua revealed by seed storage protein polymorphism. Comm. Biomet. and Crop Sci. 2: 41 — 48.
Google Scholar

Morikawa T. 1989. Genetic analysis on dwarfness of wild oats, Avena fatua. Jap. J. Genet. 64: 363 — 371.
Google Scholar

Morikawa T., Sumiya M., Kuriyama S. 2007. Transfer of new dwarfing genes from the weed species Avena fatua into cultivated oat A. byzantina. Plant Breed. 126: 30 — 35.
Google Scholar

Nalewaja J. D. 1977. Wild oats: global gloom. Proc. West. Soc. of Weed Science. Vol. 30: 21 — 32.
Google Scholar

Nei M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70: 3321 — 3323.
Google Scholar

Nei M., Li H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 76: 5269 — 5273.
Google Scholar

Powell W., Machray G., Provan J. 1996. Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends in Plant Science. 1: 215 — 222.
Google Scholar

Rajhathy T., Thomas H. 1974. Cytogenetics of oats (Avena L.). Misc. Publ. Genet. Soc., No. 2. Ottawa, Ontario, Kanada: 5 — 90.
Google Scholar

Rines H. W., Stuthman D. D., Briggle L. W., Youngs V. L., Jedlinski H., Smith D. H., Webster J. A., Rothman P. R. 1980. Collection and evaluation of Avena fatua for use in oat improvement. Crop Sci. 20: 63 — 68.
Google Scholar

Rohlf F. J. 2001. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 5.1. Exeter Publishing Ltd., Setauket, N.Y.
Google Scholar

Sharma M. D., Van Den Born W. H. 1978. The biology of Canadian weeds. Avena fatua L. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58: 141 — 157.
Google Scholar

Skrzyczyńska J., Pawlonka Z. 1998. Ekspansja owsa głuchego. Now. Rol. 5 (6): 13 — 14.
Google Scholar

Sztuba-Solińska J. 2005. Systemy markerów molekularnych i ich zastosowanie w hodowli roślin. Kosmos 54: 227 — 239.
Google Scholar

Welch R. W., Leggett J. M. 1997. Nitrogen content, oil content and oil composition of oat cultivars (Avena sativa) and wild Avena species in relation to nitrogen fertility, yield and partitioning of assimilates. J. Cereal Sci. 26: 105 — 120.
Google Scholar

Zeller F. J. 1998. Nutzung des genetischen Potenzials der Avena — Wildarten zur Verbesserung des Saathafers (Avena sativa L.). J. Appl. Genet. 72: 180 — 185.
Google Scholar

Ziętkiewicz E., Rafalski A., Labuda D. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR) — anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176 — 183.
Google Scholar


Published
2009-06-30

Cited by

Paczos-Grzęda, E., Kruk, K. and Okoń, S. (2009) “Assessment of Avena fatua L. intraspecific genetic similarity based on DNA polymorphism”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (252), pp. 235–243. doi: 10.37317/biul-2009-0071.

Authors

Edyta Paczos-Grzęda 
edyta.paczos@up.lublin.pl
Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie Poland

Authors

Katarzyna Kruk 

Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie Poland

Authors

Sylwia Okoń 

Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli i Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 50
PDF downloads: 34


License

Copyright (c) 2009 Edyta Paczos-Grzęda, Katarzyna Kruk, Sylwia Okoń

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)