Analysis of genotype-environment interaction for the yield of rye cultivars

Henryk Bujak

henryk.bujak@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza, Wrocław (Poland)

Anna Dopierała


Lochow - Petkus Polska Sp. z o. o. (Poland)

Paweł Dopierała


Lochow - Petkus Polska Sp. z o. o. (Poland)

Kamila Nowosad


Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza, Wrocław (Poland)

Abstract

The paper presents results of analysis of cultivar  environment interaction in winter rye yield trials. Ten open-pollinated (Motto, Warko, Dańkowskie Złote, Amilo, Wibro, Zduno, Kier, Walet, Hegro, Bosmo) and 4 hybrid (Klawo, Nawid, Ursus, Fernando) cultivars were sown in a split-block design with two replications at 8 locations (Wrocikowo, Marinowo, Sulejów, Tomaszów Bolesławiecki, Pokój, Lubliniec, Głodowo, Wyczechy) over a three-year period (2001–2003). The data were analyzed statistically with the computer program SERGEN 3. Mean squares for cultivars, years, locations and genotype × environment interaction were all significant. The hybrid cultivars, with the exception of Nawid, yielded higher than the open-pollinated cultivars, but they were more sensitive to changing environmental conditions. Cultivar Bosmo in standard husbandary conditions and the cultivars Warko and Hegro in intensive variant of cultivation showed stable performance.

 

Keywords:

genotype-environment interaction, grain yield, rye cultivars

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z. 1980. Analiza jednorocznej serii ortogonalnej doświadczeń odmianowych ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem interakcji odmianowo-środowiskowej. Analiza ogólna. Biul. Oceny Odmian 2 (12): 67 — 81.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z., Krajewski P., Siatkowski I. 1998. Podręcznik użytkownika programu Sergen 3. IGR Poznań.
Google Scholar

Dopierała P., Bujak H., Kaczmarek J., Dopierała A. 2003. Ocena interakcji genotypowo-środowiskowej plonu populacyjnych i mieszańcowych odmian żyta ozimego. Biul. IHAR 230: 243 — 253.
Google Scholar

Eberhart S. A., Russel W. A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop. Sci. 6: 36 — 40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x
Google Scholar

Kaczmarek Z. 1986. Analiza interakcji genotypowo-środowiskowej w doświadczeniach zakładanych w blokach niekompletnych. Rocz. Nauk. AR Poznań.
Google Scholar

Kadłubiec W., Bujak H., Kaczmarek J., Grochowski L. 1998. Ocena podobieństwa populacyjnych i mieszańcowych odmian żyta ozimego. Biul. IHAR 205/206: 23 — 29.
Google Scholar

Mądry W. 2003 a. Zastosowanie modeli mieszanych Shukli i regresji łącznej do analizy stabilności i adaptacji genotypów. Cz. I. Podstawy teoretyczne. Biul. IHAR 226/227: 7 — 14.
Google Scholar

Mądry W. 2003 b. Zastosowanie modeli mieszanych Shukli i regresji łącznej do analizy stabilności i adaptacji genotypów. Cz. II. Przykład dla pszenicy jarej. Biul. IHAR 226/227: 15 — 23.
Google Scholar

Shukla G. K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 89: 327 — 345.
Google Scholar


Published
2006-09-29

Cited by

Bujak, H. (2006) “Analysis of genotype-environment interaction for the yield of rye cultivars”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (240/241), pp. 151–160. doi: 10.37317/biul-2006-0045.

Authors

Henryk Bujak 
henryk.bujak@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza, Wrocław Poland

Authors

Anna Dopierała 

Lochow - Petkus Polska Sp. z o. o. Poland

Authors

Paweł Dopierała 

Lochow - Petkus Polska Sp. z o. o. Poland

Authors

Kamila Nowosad 

Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza, Wrocław Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 155
PDF downloads: 24


License

Copyright (c) 2006 Henryk Bujak, Anna Dopierała, Paweł Dopierała, Kamila Nowosad

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>