Phenotypic and genetic divergence of spring barley breeding lines

Maria Surma

office@igr.poznan.pl
Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań (Poland)

Tadeusz Adamski


Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań (Poland)

Andrzej Bichoński


Małopolska Hodowla Roślin, SHR Polanowice (Poland)

Zdzisław Biliński


Hodowla Roślin Smolice, Sp. z o.o., ZD Bąków (Poland)

Zbigniew Bystry


Poznańska Hodowla Roślin, Sp. z o.o. (Poland)

Piotr Jarosz


Hodowla Roślin Szelejewo, Sp. z o.o., SHR Modzurów (Poland)

Zygmunt Kaczmarek


Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań (Poland)

Anetta Kuczyńska


Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań (Poland)

Karolina Krystkowiak


Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań (Poland)

Wojciech Mikulski


Hodowla Roślin Szelejewo, Sp. z o.o., SHR Modzurów (Poland)

Jadwiga Nadziak


Hodowla Roślin Smolice, Sp. z o.o., ZD Bąków (Poland)

Wanda Orłowska-Job


Hodowla Roślin Strzelce, Sp. z o.o. (Poland)

Zdzisław Paszkiewicz


Poznańska Hodowla Roślin, Sp. z o.o. (Poland)

Michał Rębarz


Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań (Poland)

Anna Sybilska


ZDHAR Radzików (Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the studies was to determine diversity of 42 barley breeding lines, examined in 2004 in a pre-registered trial, in relation to their usefulness as parents in crossing programme. Phenotypic distance and genetic similarity were evaluated. Phenotypic divergence regarding yield-related traits, plant hight and heading date treated simultaneously was estimated using multivariate analysis of variance and canonical variate analysis. Genetic similarity was calculated on the basis of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Narrow genetic diversity was found in the analysed barley lines. Phenotypic divergence was much higher, but no close relationship between genetic and phenotypic distances was observed. Line STH363 considerably differed from the other lines at a molecular level. This line could be used as a parent in crossing programme.


Keywords:

barley, genetic similarity, phenotypic distance, multivariate analysis

Bednarek P. T., Masojć P., Lewandowska R., Myśków B. 2003. Saturating rye genetic map with amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. J. Appl. Genet. 44 (1): 21 — 33.
Google Scholar

de Bustos A., Casanova C., Soler C., Jouve N. 1998. RAPD variation in wild population of four species of the genus Hordeum. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 101 — 111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050715
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Kaczmarek Z. 1973. Metody kompleksowej analizy doświadczenia wielocechowego. Trzecie Colloquium Metodologiczne z Agro-Biometrii, PAN, Warszawa-Wrocław: 258 — 320.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Dyczkowski A., Kaczmarek Z. 1976. Testowanie hipotez w wielozmiennej analizie wariancji i kowariancji. Algorytmy Biometryczne i Statystyczne 5: 77 — 113.
Google Scholar

Ceranka B., Chudzik H., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z. 1977. Wielozmienna analiza wariancji dla doświadczeń czynnikowych. Algorytmy Biometryczne i Statystyczne 6: 51 — 79.
Google Scholar

Dahleen L. S., Hoffman D. L., Dohrmann J., Gruber R., Franckowiak J. 1997. Use of a subset of doubled-haploid lines for RAPD interval mapping in barley. Genome 40: 626 — 632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/g97-082
Google Scholar

Devos K. M., Gale M. D. 1992. The use of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers in wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 567 — 572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00224153
Google Scholar

Dillmann C., Bar-Hen A., Guérin D., Charcosset A., Murigneux A. 1997. Comparison of RFLP and morphological distances between maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines. Consequences for germplasm protection purposes.Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 92 — 102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050536
Google Scholar

Garcia E., Jamilena M., Alvarez J.I., Arnedo T., Oliver J.L., Lozano R. 1998. Genetic relationships among melon breeding lines revealed by RAPD markers and agronomic traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 878 — 885. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050815
Google Scholar

Jinks J. L., Pooni H. S. 1976. Predicting the properties of recombinant inbred lines derived by single seed descent. Heredity 36: 253 — 266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1976.30
Google Scholar

Kuczyńska A., Milczarski P., Surma M., Masojć P., Adamski T. 2001. Genetic diversity among cultivars of spring barley revealed by random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). J. Appl. Genet. 42: 43 — 48.
Google Scholar

Marić S., Bolaric S., Pejic I., Kozumplik V. 2004. Genetic diversity of haploid wheat cultivars estimated by RAPD markers, morphological traits and coefficient of parentage. Plant Breeding 123: 366 — 369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2004.00956.x
Google Scholar

Nei M., Li W.H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76: 5269 — 5273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.76.10.5269
Google Scholar

Parker G. D., Fox P. N., Langridge P., Chalmers K., Whan B., Ganter P. F. 2002. Genetic diversity within Australian wheat breeding programs based on molecular and pedigree data. Euphytica 124: 293 — 306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015725522441
Google Scholar

Rebourg C., Gouesnard B., Charcosset A. 2001. Large scale molecular analysis of traditional European maize populations. Relationships with morphological variation. Heredity 86: 574 — 587. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00869.x
Google Scholar

Schut J. W., Qi X., Stam P. 1997. Association between relationship measures based on AFLP markers, pedigree data and morphological traits in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 1161 — 1168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050677
Google Scholar

Surma M. 1996. Biometryczno-genetyczna analiza cech ilościowych mieszańców i linii podwojonych haploidów jęczmienia jarego. Rozprawy i Monografie IGR PAN, nr 3, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Tinker N. A., Fortin M. G., Mather D. E. 1993. Random amplified polymorphic DNA and pedigree relationships in spring barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85: 976 — 984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00215037
Google Scholar

Wolko B., Święcicki W. K., Kruszka K., Irzykowska L. 2000. Isozyme and RAPD markers for the identification of pea, field bean and lupin cultivars. J. Appl. Genet. 41 (3): 151 — 165.
Google Scholar


Published
2005-06-30

Cited by

Surma, M. (2005) “Phenotypic and genetic divergence of spring barley breeding lines”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (236), pp. 137–146. doi: 10.37317/biul-2005-0045.

Authors

Maria Surma 
office@igr.poznan.pl
Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań Poland

Authors

Tadeusz Adamski 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań Poland

Authors

Andrzej Bichoński 

Małopolska Hodowla Roślin, SHR Polanowice Poland

Authors

Zdzisław Biliński 

Hodowla Roślin Smolice, Sp. z o.o., ZD Bąków Poland

Authors

Zbigniew Bystry 

Poznańska Hodowla Roślin, Sp. z o.o. Poland

Authors

Piotr Jarosz 

Hodowla Roślin Szelejewo, Sp. z o.o., SHR Modzurów Poland

Authors

Zygmunt Kaczmarek 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań Poland

Authors

Anetta Kuczyńska 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań Poland

Authors

Karolina Krystkowiak 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań Poland

Authors

Wojciech Mikulski 

Hodowla Roślin Szelejewo, Sp. z o.o., SHR Modzurów Poland

Authors

Jadwiga Nadziak 

Hodowla Roślin Smolice, Sp. z o.o., ZD Bąków Poland

Authors

Wanda Orłowska-Job 

Hodowla Roślin Strzelce, Sp. z o.o. Poland

Authors

Zdzisław Paszkiewicz 

Poznańska Hodowla Roślin, Sp. z o.o. Poland

Authors

Michał Rębarz 

Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań Poland

Authors

Anna Sybilska 

ZDHAR Radzików Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 253
PDF downloads: 45


License

Copyright (c) 2005 Maria Surma, Tadeusz Adamski, Andrzej Bichoński, Zdzisław Biliński, Zbigniew Bystry, Piotr Jarosz, Zygmunt Kaczmarek, Anetta Kuczyńska, Karolina Krystkowiak, Wojciech Mikulski, Jadwiga Nadziak, Wanda Orłowska-Job, Zdzisław Paszkiewicz, Michał Rębarz, Anna Sybilska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >>