Molecular and cytogenetic analysis and estimation of some quantitative traits of interspecific hybrids Avena sativa L. × Avena fatua L.

Maria Chrząstek

dziekanat.agbioinz@up.lublin.pl
Instytut Genetyki i Hodowli Roślin, Akademia Rolnicza, Lublin (Poland)

Edyta Paczos-Grzęda


Instytut Genetyki i Hodowli Roślin, Akademia Rolnicza, Lublin (Poland)

Abstract

The aim of the presented paper were genetic and breeding studies of F2 interspecific hybrids Avena sativa L. cv. Borys × Avena fatua L. and the parental forms. Hybrid character of this cross combination was confirmed using the RAPD (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA) method. Configurations of chromosomes in pollen mother cells (PMCs) at methaphase I and anaphase I, frequency of micronuclei in tetrads, viability and size of pollen grains were analysed in order to estimate the cytogenetic stability of hybrids. At metaphase I mainly bivalents were observed and at anaphase I rarely lagging chromosomes and chromatid bridges were noted. In the hybrids, as well as in the initial forms, tetrads were properly formed and pollen was highly viable. The obtained results testify to good stability of the analysed genotypes. The hybrids were compared to their parental forms regarding some quantitative traits. In majority of cases significant differences were stated. In comparison with the Borys variety, hybrids were higher and had longer panicles. Number of spikelets per panicle, as well as number and weight of kernels, were lower than in the parental forms. Higher fertility and total protein content in kernels, but at the same time lower weight of 1000 kernels were stated.

 

Keywords:

Avena sativa L., Avena fatua L., RAPD, interspecific hybrids, meiosis, PMC, quantitative traits

Cavan G., Biss P., Moss S. R. 1998. Herbicide resistance and gene flow in wild-oats (Avena fatua and Avena sterilis ssp. ludoviciana). Ann. Appl. Biol. 133: 207 — 217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1998.tb05821.x
Google Scholar

Dilkova M., Jellen E. N., Forsberg R. A. 2000. C-banded karyotypes and meiotic abnormalities in germplasm derived from interploidy crosses in Avena. Euphytica 111: 175 — 184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003855831536
Google Scholar

Frey K. J. 1986. Genetic resources and their use in oat breeding. In: Lawes D. A., Thomas H. (ed.). Proc.of the 2nd Int Oat Conf. 1985, Aberystwyth, U.K. 9 — 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4408-4_2
Google Scholar

Gornall R. J. 1977. Notes on the size and exine ornamentation of Avena pollen grains. Can. J. Bot. 55: 2622 — 2629. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/b77-300
Google Scholar

Górny A. G. 2000. Genetyka cech morfologicznych owsa. IGR PAN, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Katsiotis A., Forsberg R. A. 1995. Pollen grain size in four ploidy levels of genus Avena. Euphytica 83: 103 — 108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01678036
Google Scholar

Ladizinsky G. 1986. Genetic resources and their use in the breeding of oats. In: Lawes D. A., Thomas H. (ed.). Proc. of the 2nd Int. Oat Conf., Aberystwyth, U.K.: 52 — 53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-4408-4_12
Google Scholar

Leggett J.M. 1996. Using and conserving Avena genetic resources. In: Proc. of. 5th Int. Oat Conf., Canada, 128 — 132.
Google Scholar

Leggett J.M. 1983. Chromosome relationships and morphological comparisons in the hybrids Avena hybrida × A. sativa and A. hybrida × A. maroccana. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 25: 255 — 260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/g83-040
Google Scholar

Leggett J.M. 1984. Morphology and metaphase chromosome pairing in three Avena hybrids. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 26: 641 — 645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/g84-101
Google Scholar

Loskutov I. G., Perchuk I. N. 2000. Evaluation of interspecific diversity in Avena genus by RAPD analysis. Oat Newslett 46.
Google Scholar

Luby J. J., Stuthman D. D. 1983. Evaluation of Avena sativa L. / A.fatua L. progenies for agronomic and grain quality characters. Crop Sci. 23: 1047 — 1052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300060007x
Google Scholar

Marshall H. G., Murphy C. F. 1981. Inheritance of dwarfness in three oat crosses and relationship of height to panicle and culm length. Crop. Sci. 21: 335 — 338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100020033x
Google Scholar

Marshall H. G., Shaner G. E. 1992. Genetics and inheritance in oat. In: S. Segoe (ed.), Oat science and technology. American Society of Agronomy. Agronomy Monograph No. 33, Madison, WI, USA: 29 — 52.
Google Scholar

McMullen M. S., Philips R. L., Stuthman D. D. 1982. Meiotic irregularities in Avena sativa L. / A. sterilis L. hybrids and breeding implications. Crop Sci. 22: 890 — 897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200040045x
Google Scholar

Milach S. C., Rines H. W., Phillips R. L., Stuthman D. D., Morikawa T. 1997. Inheritance of a new dwarfing gene in oat. Crop Sci. 38: 356 — 360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800020013x
Google Scholar

Milligan B. G. 1992. Plant DNA isolation. In: Molecular analysis of populations: a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, UK, 59 — 88.
Google Scholar

Nita Z. T. 1999. Stan aktualny i nowe kierunki hodowli owsa w Polsce. Żywność. Kwartalnik Polskiego Towarzystwa Technologów Żywności 6 (supl. 1): 186 — 192.
Google Scholar

Paczos-Grzęda E. 2002. Studia genetyczno-hodowlane nad mieszańcami heksaploidalnego owsa Avena sativa L. × Avena sterilis L. oraz formami rodzicielskimi. Praca doktorska. AR Lublin.
Google Scholar

Penner G. A., Chong J., Wight C. P., Molnar S. J., Fedak G. 1993. Identification of RAPD marker for the crown rust resistance gene Pc68 in oats. Genome 36: 818 — 820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/g93-108
Google Scholar

Rajhathy T., Thomas H. 1972. Genetic control of chromosome pairing in hexaploid oats. Nature New Biology 239: 217 — 219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/newbio239217a0
Google Scholar

Rakowska M. 1990. Znaczenie jakościowej hodowli roślin dla poprawy struktury pasz. Biul. IHAR 173/174: 5 — 16.
Google Scholar

Rines H. W., Stuthman D. D., Briggle L. W., Youngs V. L., Jedlinski H., Smith D. H., Webster J. A., Rothman P. G. 1980. Collection and evaluation of Avena fatua for use in oat improvement. Crop Sci. 20: 65 — 68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183X002000010015x
Google Scholar

Sereno-Tavares M. J., Bodanese-Zanettini M., Carvalho F., Matsumara A. 1992. Variability in A. sativa, A. sterilis and their hybrids: morphologic, cytogenetic and electrophoretic evaluations. Proc. of the 4th Int. Oat Conf., Adelaide, South Australia: 93 — 94.
Google Scholar

Stalker H. T. 1980. Utilization of wild species for crop improvement. Advances in Agronomy No. 33: 111 — 147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60165-0
Google Scholar

Takeda K., Frey K. J. 1979. Protein yield and its relationship to other traits in backcross population in from an A. sativa × A. sterilis cross. Crop Sci. 19: 623 — 628. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1979.0011183X001900050019x
Google Scholar

Takeda K., Frey K. J. 1980. Tertiary seed set in oats cultivars. Crop Sci. 20: 771 — 774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1980.0011183X002000060023x
Google Scholar

Thomas H. 1992. Cytogenetics of Avena. In: S. Segoe (ed.), Oat science and technology. American Society of Agronomy. Agronomy Monograph No. 33, Madison, WI, USA: 473 — 507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr33.c14
Google Scholar

Thomas H., Al-Ansari N. 1980. Genotypic control of chromosome pairing in amphiploids involving the cultivated oat Avena sativa L. Euphytica 37: 37 — 45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00037221
Google Scholar

Thomas H., Powell W., Aung T. 1980. Interfering with regular meiotic behaviour in Avena sativa as a method of incorporating the gene for mildew resistance from A. barbata. Euphytica 29: 635 — 640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023211
Google Scholar

Vos P., Hogers R., Bleeker M., Reijans M., van de Lee T., Hornes M., Frijters A., Pot J., Peleman J., Kuiper M., Zabeau M. 1995. AFLP — a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucl. Acids Res. 23: 4407 — 4414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/23.21.4407
Google Scholar

Wight C. P., Penner G. A., O’Donoughue L. S., Burrows V. D., Molnar S. J., Fedak G. 1994. The identification of random amplified polymorphic DNA markers for daylength insensitivity in oat. Genome 37: 910 — 914. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/g94-130
Google Scholar

Williams J. G. K., Kubelik A. R., Livak K. J., Rafalski J. A., Tingey S. V. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl. Acids Res. 18: 6531 — 6535. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/18.22.6531
Google Scholar

Wojcieska U. 1993. Fizjologia owsa. W: J. Mazurek (red.) Biologia i agrotechnika owsa. IUNG Puławy, 53 — 94.
Google Scholar

Zietkiewicz E., Rafalski A., Labuda D. 1994. Genome fingerprinting by simple-sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics 20: 176 — 183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/geno.1994.1151
Google Scholar


Published
2003-12-31

Cited by

Chrząstek, M. and Paczos-Grzęda, E. (2003) “Molecular and cytogenetic analysis and estimation of some quantitative traits of interspecific hybrids Avena sativa L. × Avena fatua L”., Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (230), pp. 387–397. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0039.

Authors

Maria Chrząstek 
dziekanat.agbioinz@up.lublin.pl
Instytut Genetyki i Hodowli Roślin, Akademia Rolnicza, Lublin Poland

Authors

Edyta Paczos-Grzęda 

Instytut Genetyki i Hodowli Roślin, Akademia Rolnicza, Lublin Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 82
PDF downloads: 23


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Maria Chrząstek, Edyta Paczos-Grzęda

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>