The yield of grain and nutritive components of naked and hulled oat varieties and of spring barley in pure sowing and in mixed crops

Marian Piech

dziekanat.wksir@zut.edu.pl
Katedra Biometrii i Doświadczalnictwa, Akademia Rolnicza w Szczecinie (Poland)

Robert Maciorowski


Katedra Biometrii i Doświadczalnictwa, Akademia Rolnicza w Szczecinie (Poland)

Krum Petkov


Katedra Żywienia Zwierząt i Paszoznawstwa, Akademia Rolnicza w Szczecinie (Poland)

Abstract

The grain harvested in the field experiment carried out in 1997–1999 at two stations (Lipnik and Strzelce) was evaluated. The experiment included 7 objects: two naked oat varieties (Akt and STH 296), hulled oat var. Bajka, barley var. Rataj, and mixtures of each of the oat varieties with barley. The yields of: total protein, crude oil, essential amino acids (lysine, methionine, cysteine, threonine) and metabolizable energy were estimated based on the grain yield, chemical composition of grain and digestibility for pigs. The yields of nutritive components (total protein, oil, essential amino acids) and the yield of metabolizable energy of naked oats mixed with barley were lower than those of hulled oats mixed with barley. Only the oil yield was higher by about 24–34%. The main factor limiting the usefulness of the naked oat varieties mixed with barley is a low yield of grains and domination of the barley grains in these mixtures. The naked oat varieties, as compared with a hulled var. Bajka, showed a higher protein content by 2% (Akt) and 11% (STH 296), a higher oil content by 55% (Akt) and 40% (STH 296), as well as similar amino acids and metabolizable energy yields. The results confirmed the high nutritive value of the naked oats cultivated in pure sowing, whereas these varieties are not as valuable as the hulled ones cultivated in the mixtures with barley.

 

Keywords:

amino acid composition, barley, grain yield, lipid content, metabolizable energy, pigs, mixtures, naked oat, protein content

Anonim. 1999. Oats in new era. Semundo Limited, Cambridge.
Google Scholar

Budzyński W. Reakcja owsa na czynniki agrotechniczne. Przegląd wyników badań krajowych. Żywność 1 (18), Supl.: 11 — 25.
Google Scholar

Green C., 2001: Maximizing energy and protein in dwarf naked oats. Third European Conference on Functional Properties in Oats. Uppsala, May 17–18. 2001: 43 — 44.
Google Scholar

Kuś J. 1999. Rola zasiewów mieszanych w różnych systemach gospodarowania. Konf. Nauk. „Przyrodnicze i produkcyjne aspekty uprawy roślin w mieszankach", Poznań 2–3 grudnia 2000: 4 — 16.
Google Scholar

Leszczyńska D., Noworolnik K. 1999. Plon białka i energii netto ziarna mieszanki zbożowej (jęczmień, owies, pszenica) w zależności od kilku czynników agrotechnicznych. Konf. Nauk. "Przyrodnicze i produkcyjne aspekty uprawy roślin w mieszankach", Poznań 2–3 grudnia: 62 — 66.
Google Scholar

Michalski T., Osiecka B., Kowalik J. 2000. Wpływ ochrony roślin na plony i wartość paszową jęczmienia i owsa oraz ich mieszanek. Rocz. AR Poznań CCCXXV, Roln. 58: 75 — 82.
Google Scholar

Maciejewicz-Ryś J., Sokół K. 1999. Wartość pokarmowa ziarna owsa oplewionego (Avena sativa L.) i nagoziarnistego (Avena sativa var. nuda). Żywność 1 (18) Supl. 273 — 278.
Google Scholar

Nita Z. 1999. Stan aktualny i nowe kierunki hodowli owsa w Polsce. Żywność 1 (18) Supl.: 186 — 192
Google Scholar

Normy żywienia Świń, Wartość Pokarmowa Pasz. 1993. PAN IFiŻZ. Omnitech Press, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Noworolnik K., Leszczyńska D. 1999. Konkurencyjność owsa względem jęczmienia w siewie mieszanym. Żywność 1 (18), Supl.: 126 — 130.
Google Scholar

Petkov K., Piech M., Lubowicki R., Łukaszewski Z., Jaskowska I., Biel W. 2001. Ocena wartości pokarmowej ziarna owsa nieoplewionego i oplewionego w żywieniu trzody chlewnej. Rocz. Nauk. Zoot. 28 (2): 151 — 157.
Google Scholar

Piech M., Maciorowski R., Nita Z. 2001 a. Reakcja owsa nieoplewionego i oplewionego na nawożenie azotem. Biul. IHAR 217: 111 — 118.
Google Scholar

Piech M., Nita Z., Maciorowski R. 2001 b. Porównanie przydatności owsa nagiego z oplewionym do uprawy w mieszankach z jęczmieniem. Rocz. AR Poznań CCCXXV, Roln. 58: 87 — 95.
Google Scholar

Rudnicki F., Wasilewski P. 2000. Efekty uprawy mieszanek zbożowych z udziałem owsa nieoplewionego. Konf. Nauk. "Przyrodnicze i produkcyjne aspekty uprawy roślin w mieszankach", Poznań 2–3 grudnia 2000: 102 — 103.
Google Scholar

Valentine J. 1995. Naked oats. In: The oat crop: Production and utilization. Chapman and Hall, London: 504 — 532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0015-1_16
Google Scholar

Valentine J. 2001. Opportunities for genetic improvement of oats. Third European Conference on Functional Properties in Oats, Uppsala, May 17–18, 2001: 14 — 16.
Google Scholar

Wróbel E., Budzyński W., Dubis B. 1999. Rolnicza, energetyczna i ekonomiczna efektywność uprawy owsa i jęczmienia jarego na glebie lekkiej. Żywność 1 (18), Supl.: 166 — 172.
Google Scholar

Zych J. 2000. Owies. Zboża jare 1999. Syntezy wyników doświadczeń odmianowych, COBORU, Słupia Wielka.
Google Scholar


Published
2003-10-31

Cited by

Piech, M., Maciorowski, R. and Petkov, K. (2003) “The yield of grain and nutritive components of naked and hulled oat varieties and of spring barley in pure sowing and in mixed crops”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (229), pp. 157–165. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0061.

Authors

Marian Piech 
dziekanat.wksir@zut.edu.pl
Katedra Biometrii i Doświadczalnictwa, Akademia Rolnicza w Szczecinie Poland

Authors

Robert Maciorowski 

Katedra Biometrii i Doświadczalnictwa, Akademia Rolnicza w Szczecinie Poland

Authors

Krum Petkov 

Katedra Żywienia Zwierząt i Paszoznawstwa, Akademia Rolnicza w Szczecinie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 54
PDF downloads: 19


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Marian Piech, Robert Maciorowski, Krum Petkov

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.