Implementation and evaluation of NegFry decision support system in late blight control strategy under Polish conditions

Józefa Kapsa

j.kapsa@ihar.edu.pl
Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Oddział w Boninie (Poland)

Jerzy Osowski


Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Oddział w Boninie (Poland)

Abstract

The purpose of various forecasting and monitoring systems using in the late blight control strategy is to define precisely the disease appearance and undertake decision about dates of recommended fungicide applications during the season. All the running in Europe systems needs basic meteorological data (air temperature, relative humidity, precipitation) and implementation of basic biological data (variety and variety resistance against late blight, crop emergence, end of season). Results of trials carried out at commercial fields in 2001 have confirmed usefulness of the NegFry system for potato field protection against late blight under Polish weather conditions. By using the NegFry system, number of fungicide applications could be reduced for 1–2, compared to intensive, routine protection. In spite of decreasing the number of sprays, significant inhibition of disease development and good control effectiveness were observed.


Keywords:

late blight control, decision support systems, potato

Bain R. A., Möller K. 1999. Factors influencing potato tuber infection by Phytophthora infestans. PAV — Special Report 5/1999. Proc. Workshop on the European Network for Development of an Integrated Control Strategy of Potato Late Blight. Sweden, Uppsala 9–12. 09.1998: 210 — 228.
Google Scholar

Forrer H. R., Gujer H. U., Fried P. M. 1993. PhytoPRE — A comprehensive information and decisions support system for late blight in potatoes. Proc. Workshop on Computer-based DSS on Crop Protection, Parma Italy: 173 — 181.
Google Scholar

Fry W. E., Apple A. E., Bruhn J. A. 1983.Evaluation of potato blight forecasts modified to incorporate host resistance and fungicide weathering. Phytopathology 73: 1054 — 1059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-73-1054
Google Scholar

Gutsche V. 1998. Usage of model Simphyt in frame of the project Paso in Germany from 1994 to 1997. PAV — Special Report 3/1998. Proc. Workshop on the European Network for Development of an Integrated Control Strategy of Potato Late Blight. Carlow, Ireland 24–27.09.1997: 104 — 110.
Google Scholar

Hansen J. G. 1997. Report of the discussions of the subgroup Decision Support Systems. PAV — Special Report 1/1997. Proc. Workshop on the European Network for Development of an Integrated Control Strategy of Potato Late Blight. Lelystad, Netherlands 30.09-3.10.1996: 15 — 19.
Google Scholar

Kapsa J. 2000. Porównanie różnych programów zwalczania zarazy ziemniaka (Phytophthora infestans). Konferencja. Ochrona ziemniaka. Kołobrzeg, 4-5. 04. 2000. IHAR Oddz. Bonin: 44 — 51.
Google Scholar

Kapsa J. 2002. Zastosowanie systemów decyzyjnych w ochronie plantacji ziemniaka przed zarazą. Progress in Plant Protection 42 (1): 1 — 7.
Google Scholar

Schepers H. T. A. M. 1998. Epidemiological parameters in decision support systems for Phytophthora infestans. PAV — Special Report 3/1998. Proc. Workshop on the European Network for Development of an Integrated Control Strategy of Potato Late Blight. Carlow, Ireland 24–27. 09. 1997: 30 — 36.
Google Scholar

Schepers H. T. A. M. 2001. The development and control of Phytophthyora infestans in Europe in 2000. PAV — Special Report 7/2001. Proc. Workshop on the European Network for Development of an Integrated Control Strategy of Potato Late Blight. Germany, Munich, 6–10. 09. 2000: 9 — 18.
Google Scholar

Ullrich J., Schrödter H. 1966. Das Problem der Vorhersage des Auftretens der Kartoffelkrautfäule (Phytophthora infestans) und die Möglichkeit seiner Lösung durch eine “Negativprognose”. Nachrichtenblatt Deut. Planzenschutz 3: 33 — 40.
Google Scholar

Wójtowicz A., Piekarczyk J. 1998. Porównanie skuteczności wybranych systemów wspierających podejmowanie decyzji w zwalczaniu zarazy ziemniaka. Progress in Plant Protection / Postępy w Ochronie Roślin 38 (2): 358 — 361.
Google Scholar


Published
2002-12-31

Cited by

Kapsa, J. and Osowski, J. (2002) “Implementation and evaluation of NegFry decision support system in late blight control strategy under Polish conditions”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (223/224), pp. 351–359. doi: 10.37317/biul-2002-0033.

Authors

Józefa Kapsa 
j.kapsa@ihar.edu.pl
Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Oddział w Boninie Poland

Authors

Jerzy Osowski 

Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin, Oddział w Boninie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 6
PDF downloads: 3


License

Copyright (c) 2002 Józefa Kapsa, Jerzy Osowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>