Evaluation of adaptability to environments of varieties in multiple annual trials: a case study of winter wheat

Tadeusz Drzazga

nasiona@mhr.com.pl
Małopolska Hodowla Roślin sp. z o.o. Oddział w Kobierzycach (Poland)

Marcin Studnicki


Katedra Doświadczalnictwa i Bioinformatyki, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie (Poland)

Abstract

The objective of this work is presenting the statistical procedures and method of inference about varieties’ responses to different environmental conditions in tested locations based on balanced dataset from annual pre-registration trials. Considered data set consisted of two-way genotype × environments classification. The two factor mixed model approaches included in Sergen 4 and Eksplan 2 softwares were used for analysis of the grain yield data. The evaluated winter wheat varieties were classified to groups with similar responses to the environments using Ward’s method for cluster analysis. Proposed statistical methods may be supporting tools in the breeding processes to differentiate the types of adaptive response to the environments in winter wheat varieties and enabling an effective search for genotypes with wide and narrow adaptation.


Keywords:

cluster analysis, cultivar adaptation, grain yield, pre-registration trials, winter wheat

Anderson W. K. 2010. Closing the gap between actual and potential yield of rainfed wheat. The impacts of environment, management and cultivar. Field Crops Res. 116: 14 — 22.
Google Scholar

Annicchiarico P. 2002 a. Defining adaptation strategies and yield stability targets in breeding programmes In: Kang M. S. (Ed.) Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. CAB, Wallingford, UK: 165 — 183.
Google Scholar

Annicchiarico P. 2002 b. Genotype-environment interactions: challenges and opportunities for plant breeding and cultivar recommendations. FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper No. 174. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
Google Scholar

Annicchiarico P., Royo C., Bellah F., Moragues M. 2009. Relationships among adaptation patterns, morphophysiological traits and molecular markers in durum wheat. Plant Breed. 128: 164 — 71.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z., Krajewski P., Siatkowski I. 2003. Podręcznik użytkowania programu SERGEN 4 . Instytut Genetyki Roślin PAN, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Chapman S. C., Crossa J., Edmeades G. O. 1997. Genotype by environment effects and selection for drought tolerance in tropical maize. I. Two mode pattern analysis of yield. Euphytica 95: 1 — 9.
Google Scholar

de la Vega A. J., Chapman S. C. 2006. Defining sunflower selection strategies for a highly heterogeneous target population of environments. Crop Sci. 46: 136 — 144.
Google Scholar

Derejko A., Mądry W., Gozdowski D., Rozbicki J., Golba J., Piechociński M., Studnicki M. 2011. Wpływ odmian, miejscowości i intensywności uprawy oraz ich interakcji na plon pszenicy ozimej w doświadczeniach PDO. Biul. IHAR 259: 131 — 146.
Google Scholar

Drzazga T., Paderewski J., Mądry W., Krajewski P., 2009. Ocena rodzajów reakcji plonowania odmian pszenicy ozimej w doświadczeniach PDO na przestrzennie zmienne warunki przyrodnicze w kraju. Biul. IHAR 293: 71 — 82.
Google Scholar

Krajewski P., Kaczmarek Z., Czajka S. 2006. Podręcznik użytkownika programu Eksplan wersja 2.
Google Scholar

Mądry W., Paderewski J., Drzazga T. 2006. Ocena reakcji plonu ziarna rodów hodowlanych pszenicy ozimej na zmienne warunki środowiskowe za pomocą analizy AMMI. Fragm. Agron. 92: 130 — 143.
Google Scholar

Mądry W., Paderewski J., Gozdowski D., Drzazga T. 2011. Adaptive yield response of winter wheat cultivars across environments in Poland using joint AMMI and cluster analyses. Intern. J. Plant Prod. 5: 299 — 310.
Google Scholar

Paderewski J., Mądry W., Pilarczyk W., Drzazga T., 2008. Retrospektywne badanie reakcji plonu odmian pszenicy ozimej na warunki środowiskowe w miejscowościach za pomocą łącznej analizy AMMI i skupień: ocena postępu genetycznego w plonowaniu. Biul. IHAR 250: 87 — 106.
Google Scholar

Paderewski J., Gauch H. G., Mądry W., Drzazga T., Rodrigues P. C. 2011. Yield response of winter wheat to agro-ecological conditions using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction and cluster analysis. Crop Sci. 51: 969 — 980.
Google Scholar

Mądry W., Iwańska M. 2012. Measures of genotype wide adaptation level and their relationships in winter wheat. Cereal Res. Comm. 40: 592 — 601.
Google Scholar

Pecetti L., Annicchiarico P., Abdelguerfi A., Kallida R., Mefti M., Porqueddu C., Simoes N., Volaire F., Lelievre F. 2011. Response of Mediterranean tall fescue cultivars to contrasting agricultural environments and implications for selection. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 197: 12 — 20.
Google Scholar

Ward J. H. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58: 236 — 244.
Google Scholar


Published
2015-03-31

Cited by

Drzazga, T. and Studnicki, M. (2015) “Evaluation of adaptability to environments of varieties in multiple annual trials: a case study of winter wheat”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (275), pp. 29–38. doi: 10.37317/biul-2015-0027.

Authors

Tadeusz Drzazga 
nasiona@mhr.com.pl
Małopolska Hodowla Roślin sp. z o.o. Oddział w Kobierzycach Poland

Authors

Marcin Studnicki 

Katedra Doświadczalnictwa i Bioinformatyki, Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 79
PDF downloads: 39


License

Copyright (c) 2015 Tadeusz Drzazga, Marcin Studnicki

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2