Comparison of methods for selection of spring barley genotypes based on non-replicated experiments

Katarzyna Ambroży-Deręgowska

katarzyna.ambrozy-deregowska@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Tadeusz Łuczkiewicz


Katedra Genetyki i Hodowli Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Katarzyna Marczyńska


Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Iwona Mejza


Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Stanisław Mejza


Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu (Poland)

Abstract

The paper deals with the methodology of inference from non-replicated breeding experiments using standard treatments (check plots). The selection of genotypes for further breeding is one of the important problems of this methodology. In the literature, there are many proposals of genotype selection methods. It is impossible to compare analytically those methods. Hence, we propose to compare six selection methods known from a literature with the method proposed by the authors. The last method is based on the theory of response surface. We compare the rankings of genotypes obtained by the all methods on the basis of the experiment with spring barley. We can see that the rankings are completely different. In the paper we recommend the selection methods based on the response surface methodology with proper using check plots.

Supporting Agencies

The work was partly carried out as part of the research project Reg. No.: N N310 111 740 financed by the National Science Center

Keywords:

breeding field expermients, check plots, genotypes selection, non-replicated experiments, response survey methodology

Adamska E., Kaczmarek Z., Woś H. 2012. Estimates of winter rapeseed hybrids on the basis of series unreplicated experiments with standards. Plant Breeding for Future Generations Proceedings of the 19th EUCARPIA General Congress 2012, Zoltán Bedő and László Láng (Eds), Hungary: 323.
Google Scholar

Ambroży K., Bakinowska E., Bocianowski J., Budka A., Pilarczyk W., Zawieja B. 2008 a. Statystyczne wspomaganie decyzji selekcyjnych na wczesnych etapach hodowli zbóż. Część I. Metody oceny efektów obiektowych. Biul. IHAR 250: 21 — 28.
Google Scholar

Ambroży K., Bakinowska E., Bocianowski J., Budka A., Pilarczyk W., Zawieja B. 2008 b. Statystyczne wspomaganie decyzji selekcyjnych na wczesnych etapach hodowli zbóż. Część II. Empiryczne porównanie metod oceny efektów obiektowych. Biul. IHAR 250: 29 — 39.
Google Scholar

Box G. E. P., Draper N. 2007. Response surfaces, mixtures, and ridge analyses. Second Edition, Wiley, New York.
Google Scholar

Kaczmarek Z., Adamska E., Mejza I., Wos H., Trzeciak R. 2013. Evaluation of parental forms on the basis of series of unreplicated experiments with their hybrids and standard varietes. Applied Statistics 2013, Abstracts, p. 70. (http://conferences.nib.si/AS2013/AS2013-Abstracts.pdf).
Google Scholar

Kempton R. A. 1981. Adjustment for competition between varieties in plant breeding trials. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 98: 599 — 611.
Google Scholar

Kempton R. A., Fox P. N. 1997. Statistical methods for plant variety evaluation. Chapman & Hall.
Google Scholar

Khuri A. I. 2006. Response surface methodology and related topics. World Scientific, Singapore.
Google Scholar

Marczyńska K., Mejza S., Mikulski W. 2010. Doświadczenia jednopowtórzeniowe we wczesnych stadiach hodowlanych. Colloquium Biometricum, 40: 63 — 72.
Google Scholar

Mejza S., Marczyńska K. 2011. Check plot density in estimation of soil fertility. Proceedings: Biometric Methods and Models in Current Science and Research, D. Hampel, J. Hartmann, J. Michalek, (eds) Central Institute of Supervising and Testing in Agriculture, Brno: 167 — 172.
Google Scholar

Mejza S., Mejza I. 2013. Check plots in field breeding experiments. Biometrical Letters Vol. 50, No 2: 137 — 149.
Google Scholar

Montgomery D. C. 2005. Design and Analysis of Experiments: Response surface method and designs. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Google Scholar

Sebolai B., Pedersen J. F., Marx D. B., Boykin D. L. 2005. Effect of control plot density, control plot arrangements, and assumption of random or fixed effects on nonreplicated experiments for germplasm screening using spatial models. Crop Sci.: 1978 — 1980.
Google Scholar

Utz H. F.1997. A computer program for statistical analysis of plant breeding experiments. Version 2N. Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science and Population Genetics. University of Hohenheim. Germany.
Google Scholar

Woś H., Adamska E., Kaczmarek Z. 2010. Metody statystyczne dla oceny mieszańców i ich linii rodzicielskich na podstawie serii doświadczeń jednopowtórzeniowych z wzorcami. Rośliny Oleiste: 243 — 256.
Google Scholar


Published
2014-12-31

Cited by

Ambroży-Deręgowska, K. (2014) “Comparison of methods for selection of spring barley genotypes based on non-replicated experiments”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (274), pp. 51–60. doi: 10.37317/biul-2014-0005.

Authors

Katarzyna Ambroży-Deręgowska 
katarzyna.ambrozy-deregowska@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Tadeusz Łuczkiewicz 

Katedra Genetyki i Hodowli Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Katarzyna Marczyńska 

Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Iwona Mejza 

Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Stanisław Mejza 

Katedra Metod Matematycznych i Statystycznych, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Poznaniu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 69
PDF downloads: 36


License

Copyright (c) 2014 Katarzyna Ambroży-Deręgowska, Tadeusz Łuczkiewicz, Katarzyna Marczyńska, Iwona Mejza, Stanisław Mejza

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>