Role of undersown catch crops in integrated and organic production systems of table potato

Anna Płaza

dwanz@uph.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach (Poland)

Barbara Gąsiorowska


Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach (Poland)

Artur Makarewicz


Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach (Poland)

Milena A. Królikowska


Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach (Poland)

Abstract

The work presents results of studies conducted in 2006–2009. Our goal was to determine the effect of undersown catch crops, which were either autumn-incorporated or left as mulch on the soil surface till spring, on the yields of table potato cultivated under either an integrated or organic farming system in the reorganization period. Two factors were examined in the experiment: I — undersown catch crops applied as fertilizer (not fertilized control, farmyard manure, white sweet clover (Melilotus albus), Westerwold ryegrass, white sweet clover — mulch, Westerwold ryegrass — mulch); II — an integrated and organic farming system in the reorganization period. The undersown catch crops were incorporated prior to table potato planting. The total fresh mass yield of potato tubers was determined during potato harvest and marketable yield after the harvest. Also, tuber samples were taken to determine dry matter, starch and total protein contents which were then expressed in terms of yields of these components. In both farming system the highest yields of potato tubers were harvested from white sweet clover mulch-fertilized plots. Higher yields were recorded under the integrated rather than organic farming system in the reorganization period. White sweet clover was found to have the same manuring value as farmyard manure irrespective of the timing of its application and farming system of potato.


Keywords:

farming system, manure, mulch, undersown catch crop, potato, yield

Boligłowa E., Gleń K. 2003. Yielding and quality of potato tubers depending on the kind of organic fertilization and tillage method. Elec. Jour. Pol. Agric. Univ., Top Agron. 1,6, www.ejpau.media.pl.
Google Scholar

Brandt K., Molgaard J. P. 2008. Organic agriculture: does it enhance or reduce the nutritional value of plant foods? J. Sci. Food Agric., 81 (9): 924 — 931.
Google Scholar

Duer I., Jończyk K. 1998. Nawożenie pod ziemniak uprawiany w gospodarstwach ekologicznych. Fragm. Agron., 1 (57): 85 — 95.
Google Scholar

Dzienia S., Szarek P., Pużyński S. 2004. Plonowanie i jakość ziemniaka w zależności od systemu uprawy roli i rodzaju nawożenia organicznego. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 500: 235 — 242.
Google Scholar

Finckh M. R., Schulte-Geldermann E., Bruns C. 2009. Challenges to Organic Potato Farming: Disease and Nutrient Management. Potato Res., 49 (1): 27 — 42.
Google Scholar

Makaraviciute A. 2003. Effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on the yield and quality of different potato varieties. Agron. Res. 1 (2): 197 — 209.
Google Scholar

Nowak G. 1982. Przemiany roślinnej materii organicznej znakowanej izotopem C14 w glebach intensywnie nawożonych. Zesz. Nauk. ART Olsztyn, Ser. Rol. 35: 3 — 57.
Google Scholar

Płaza A., Ceglarek F. 2009. Tuber quality of edible potato fertilized with catch crops and barley straw. Annales UMCS, Sec. E, LXIV (3): 79 — 90.
Google Scholar

Płaza A., Gąsiorowska B., Makarewicz A., Królikowska M. A. 2013: Plonowanie ziemniaka nawożonego wsiewkami międzyplonowymi w integrowanym i ekologicznym systemie produkcji. Biul. IHAR 267: 71 — 78.
Google Scholar

Reust W., Neyroud J. A., Dutoid J. P. 1999. Potato fertilization in integrated farming system. 14th Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research. Sorrento, Italy, 02-07.05.1999: 259 — 260.
Google Scholar

Rudella C. A., Davenport J. R., Evans R. G., Hattendorf M. J., Alva A. K., Boydston R. A. 2005. Relating potato yield and quality to field scale variability in soil characteristics. Amer. J. Pot. Res. 79 (5): 317 — 323.
Google Scholar

Sadowski J. 1992. Porównanie efektywności obornika, słomy, nawozów zielonych i biohumusu w uprawie ziemniaka. Mat. konf. nauk. nt. „Produkcyjne skutki zmniejszenia nakładów na agrotechnikę roślin uprawnych. ART Olsztyn, 25–26.03.1992: 216 — 222.
Google Scholar

Sawicka B., Kuś J. 2000. Zmienność składu chemicznego bulw ziemniaka w warunkach ekologicznego i integrowanego systemu produkcji. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 489: 273 — 282.
Google Scholar

Sawicka B., Barbaś P., Kuś J. 2007. Variability of potato yield and structure in organic and integrated crop production systems. Elec. Jour. Pol. Agric. Univ., Top. Agron. 10,1, www.ejpau.media.pl.
Google Scholar

Spiertz J. H. J., Haverkort A. J., Verejken P. H. 1996. Environmentally safe and consumer friendly potato production in The Netherlands. 1. Development of ecologically sound production system. Pot. Res. 39: 371 — 378.
Google Scholar

Zarzyńska K., Goliszewski W. 2006. Uprawa ziemniaka w systemie ekologicznym i integrowanym a jakość plonu bulw. Pam. Puł. 142: 617 — 626.
Google Scholar


Published
2013-09-30

Cited by

Płaza, A. (2013) “Role of undersown catch crops in integrated and organic production systems of table potato”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (269), pp. 51–59. doi: 10.37317/biul-2013-0016.

Authors

Anna Płaza 
dwanz@uph.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach Poland

Authors

Barbara Gąsiorowska 

Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach Poland

Authors

Artur Makarewicz 

Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach Poland

Authors

Milena A. Królikowska 

Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 44
PDF downloads: 33


License

Copyright (c) 2013 Anna Płaza, Barbara Gąsiorowska, Artur Makarewicz, Milena A. Królikowska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>