Sugar beets fertilization with potassium, sodium and magnesium — yielding and diagnostic evaluation

Part II. Quality of roots and yield of sugar

Przemysław Barłóg

agro@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)

Witold Grzebisz


Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)

Abstract

The field experiments were carried out in 1997–1999 in randomized permanent plots (split-block design) with four replications. The first experimental factor was a sugar beet variety: Sonja, Fontana and Evita. The second-rate factor was fertilization, applied in four variants: 1. control (O), 2. potassium at 160 kg K2O per 1 ha (K), 3. potassium, sodium and magnesium in a combination: 160 kg K2O + 12 kg Na + 14.4 kg Mg per 1 ha (KNaMg), and 4. potassium, sodium and the increased dose of magnesium in a combination: 160 kg K2O + 12 kg Na + 38.3 kg Mg per 1 ha (KNa3Mg). The weather conditions during the vegetation period were the main factor influencing quality of sugar beet roots. According to sugar content, the varieties were classified as follows: Evita ≥ Sonja ≥ Fontana. The difference between cultivars Evita and Fontana was significant. No significant effect of fertilization with K, Na and Mg on sugar content was observed, although in treatments K and KNa3Mg this trait reached a higher level, as compared to the control, by 0.12% and 0.2%, respectively. The varieties showed different ways of creating their yields, as related to the quality features. Generally, the plants fertilized with KNaMg produced the highest yield of sugar.


Keywords:

magnesium, potassium, sodium, sugar beet, sugar yield, technological quality, variety

Bell Ch., Jones J., Milford G. F. J., Leigh T. 1992. The effects of crop nutrition on sugar beet quality. Aspects Appl. Biol. 32: 19 — 26.
Google Scholar

Bell Ch., Milford G. F. J., Leigh R. A. 1996. Sugar beet. In: Photoassimilate Distribution in Plants and Crops. (Eds. E. Zamski and A. A. Schaffer). New York, Marcel Dekker Inc.: 691 — 707.
Google Scholar

Beiß U. 1982. Kalium — Hauptnährstoff und Qualitätsbestimmender Inhaltsstoff der Rübe. Die Zuckerrübe 31, 2: 79 — 83.
Google Scholar

Beringer H., Koch K., Lindhauer M. G. 1986. Sucrose accumulation and osmotic potentials in sugar beet at increasing levels of potassium nutrition. J. Sci. Food Agric. 37: 211 — 218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740370303
Google Scholar

Buchholz K., Märländer B., Puke, H., Glattkowski H., Thielecke K. 1995. Neubewertung des technischen Wertes von Zuckerrüben. Zuckerind. 120, 2: 113 — 121.
Google Scholar

Bürcky K., Beiß U., Winner L., Drath L., Schiweck H. 1978. Versuche zur Bedeutung des Nährstoffsangebotes für die Qualität der Zuckerrübe. II. Stickstoff und Kalium. Zuckerind. 103, 3: 190 — 199.
Google Scholar

Gutmański I. 1991. Produkcja buraka cukrowego. PWRiL, Poznań: 699 ss.
Google Scholar

Günther I., Stephan K. H. 1996. Produktiontechnische Reserven im Zuckerrübenbau. Zuckerind. 121, 8: 640 — 653.
Google Scholar

Hoffmann Ch., Märländer B. 2001. Perspektiven des Ertragspotentials von Zuckerrüben — Einfluss von Witterung und Standort. In: Fortschritte im Zuckerrübenbau. Südzucker AG: 22 — 29.
Google Scholar

IFZ. 2000. Institut für Zuckerrübenforschung, Göttingen, Jahresbericht 1999/2000: 12 — 13.
Google Scholar

Konys L., Wiśniewski P. 1984. Analiza ścieżki. Rocz. AR Poznań, 146: 597 — 603.
Google Scholar

Maslaris N., Christodoulou P., Zountsas G. 1996. Quantatitive effect of root/leaf growth rate on root quality parameters in sugar beet. Proceedings of the 29th General Assembly of CITS, Munich, Germany, 26–30 June 1995: 85 — 93.
Google Scholar

Orlovius K. 1993. Einfluss unterschiedlicher K-Düngung und K-Bodenversorgung auf die Qualität von Zuckerrüben. Kongressband 1993, VDLUFA-Schriftenreiche 37: 107 — 110.
Google Scholar

Pocock T. O., Milford G. F. J., Armstrong M. J. 1990. Storage root quality in relation to nitrogen uptake. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 115: 355 — 362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600075791
Google Scholar

Pollach G., Hein W., Rösner G. 1996. Definition der inneren Qualität von Zuckerrüben. Zuckerind. 121, 5: 332 — 344.
Google Scholar

Oltmann W., Burba M., Bolz G. 1984. Die Qualität der Zuckerrübe — Bedeutung, Beurteilungskriterien und züchterische maßnahmen zu ihrer Verbesserung. Fortschritte der Pflanzenzüchtung, H. 12, Paul Parey, Verlag, Berlin, Hamburg.
Google Scholar

Siódmiak J. 2002. Odmiany buraka cukrowego, ich ocena i wartość gospodarcza. W: W. Grzebisz (red.) Nowoczesna uprawa buraków cukrowych. Wyd. AR Poznań: 29 — 40.
Google Scholar

Shibayama T., Takada S., Hayashida M. 1989. Interactions between varietal characteristics and environmental factors. 5. Proceedings of the Japanese Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 31: 13 — 19.
Google Scholar

Trętowski J., Wójcik A. R. 1988. Metodyka doświadczeń rolniczych. WSRP Siedlce.
Google Scholar

Wendenburg Ch., Koch H. J. 1996. Zum Einfluß unterschiedlicher Sorteneigenschaften auf den Stickstoffentzug von Zuckerrüben. Zuckerind. 121, 8: 623 — 630.
Google Scholar

Winzer T., Lohaus G., Heldt H. W. 1996. Influence of phloem transport, N fertilization and ion accumulation on sucrose storage in the taproots of fodder and sugar beet. J. Exp. Bot. 47, 300: 863 — 870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.7.863
Google Scholar

Wolf. I. 1995. Sorte und Sortenwahl bei Zuckerrüben und den Wechselwirkung zu Umwelt und Qualitätsbezahlung. Dissertation, Universität Göttingen, Cuvillier, Göttingen.
Google Scholar

Wyse R. E., Zamski E., Tomos A. D. 1986. Turgor regulation of sucrose transport in sugar beet taproot tissue. Plant Physiol. 81: 478 — 481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.81.2.478
Google Scholar


Published
2004-12-31

Cited by

Barłóg, P. and Grzebisz, W. (2004) “Sugar beets fertilization with potassium, sodium and magnesium — yielding and diagnostic evaluation: Part II. Quality of roots and yield of sugar”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (234), pp. 83–92. doi: 10.37317/biul-2004-0011.

Authors

Przemysław Barłóg 
agro@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Witold Grzebisz 

Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 9
PDF downloads: 3


License

Copyright (c) 2004 Przemysław Barłóg, Witold Grzebisz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)