The influence of undersown crops on yield of table potato cultivated in integrated production system

Anna Płaza

iro@uph.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach (Poland)

Abstract

The paper presents results of studies carried out from 2006 to 2009 which aimed to determine the influence of undersown crops plowed down in the autumn or left till spring in the form of mulch on table potato yielding. The following treatments were examined: control object (without undersown crops fertilization), farmyard manure, serradella, westerwold ryegrass, serradella — mulch, westerwold ryegrass — mulch. The content of dry mass and macroelements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg) were determined in undersown crops biomass. Table potatoes were grown directly after undersown crops fertilization. During potato harvest the yield of fresh tubers mass was determined and after that the marketable yield and the structure of tuber yield were determined. The obtained results allow to conclude that among undersown crops westerwold ryegrass gives the highest amount of dry mass in soil, and serradella the highest amount of macroelements. Serradella fertilization both left till spring in the form of mulch and plowed down fully replaced farmyard manure in potato cultivation. The highest shares of marketable and seed potato fractions, and the lowest share of small tubers was noted in combination fertilized with serradella in the form of mulch.


Keywords:

fertilization, mulch, potato, undersown crop, the structure of tuber yield, yield

Ceglarek F., Płaza A., Buraczyńska D., Jabłońska-Ceglarek R. 1998. Alternatywne nawożenie organiczne ziemniaka jadalnego w makroregionie środkowo-wschodnim. Cz. I. Wartość nawozowa wsiewek poplonowych w zależności od ich sposobu użytkowania na tle obornika i nawożenia słomą. Rocz. Nauk Rol. Ser. A, T. 113, Z. 3–4: 173 — 188.
Google Scholar

Duer I. 1999. Plon suchej masy kilku odmian koniczyny uprawianej w ekologicznym i integrowanym systemie produkcji oraz akumulacja azotu w glebie. Zesz. Nauk. AR Kraków 347: 69 — 77.
Google Scholar

Duer I., Jończyk K. 1998. Nawożenie pod ziemniak uprawiany w gospodarstwach ekologicznych. Frag. Agron. 1 (57): 85 — 95.
Google Scholar

Dzienia S., Szarek P., Pużyński S. 2004. Plonowanie i jakość ziemniaka w zależności od systemu uprawy roli i rodzaju nawożenia organicznego. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 500: 235 — 242.
Google Scholar

Głuska A. 2004. Wpływ zmiennego rozkładu opadów na cechy bulw ziemniaka (Solanum tuberosum L.) oraz wyznaczenie okresu krytycznego wrażliwości na niedobór wody u odmian o różnej długości okresu wegetacji. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 496: 217 — 227.
Google Scholar

Kołodziejczyk M., Szmigiel A., Kiełbasa S. 2007. Plonowanie oraz skład chemiczny bulw ziemniaka w warunkach zróżnicowanego nawożenia. Fragm. Agron. 2 (94): 142 — 150.
Google Scholar

Kuraszkiewicz R., Pałys E. 2002. Wpływ roślin ochronnych na plon masy nadziemnej wsiewek międzyplonowych. Annales UMCS, Sec. E 57: 105 — 112.
Google Scholar

Makaraviciute A. 2003. Effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on the yield and quality of different potato varieties. Agron. Res. 1 (2): 197 — 209.
Google Scholar

Nowak G. 1982. Przemiany roślinnej materii organicznej znakowanej izotopem C14 w glebach intensywnie nawożonych. Zesz. Nauk. ART Olsztyn, Ser. Rol. 35: 3 — 57.
Google Scholar

Płaza A., Ceglarek F., Królikowska M. A., Próchnicka M. 2010. Rola wsiewek międzyplonowych w nawożeniu ziemniaka jadalnego odmiany Syrena. Biul. IHAR 257/258: 137 — 143.
Google Scholar

Reust W., Neyroud J. A., Dutoid J. P. 1999. Potato fertilization in integrated farming system. 14th Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research. Sorrento, Italy, 02-07.05.1999: 259 — 260.
Google Scholar

Roztropowicz S. 1989. Środowiskowe, odmianowe i nawozowe źródła zmienności składu chemicznego bulw ziemniaka. Frag. Agron. 1 (21): 33 — 75.
Google Scholar

Rudella C. A., Davenport J. R., Evans R. G., Hattendorf M. J., Alva A. K., Boydston R. A. 2005. Relating potato yield and quality to field scale variability in soil characteristics. Amer. J. Pot. Res. 79 (5): 317 — 323.
Google Scholar

Sadowski J. 1992. Porównanie efektywności obornika, słomy, nawozów zielonych i biohumusu w uprawie ziemniaka. Mat. konf. nauk. nt. „Produkcyjne skutki zmniejszenia nakładów na agrotechnikę roślin uprawnych. ART Olsztyn, 25-26.03.1992: 216 — 222.
Google Scholar

Spiertz J. H. J., Haverkort A. J., Vereijken P. H. 1996. Environmentally safe and consumer friendly potato production in The Netherlands. 1. Development of ecologically sound production system. Pot. Res. 39: 371 — 378.
Google Scholar

Songin W. 1998. Międzyplony w rolnictwie proekologicznym. Post. Nauk Rol. 2: 43 — 51.
Google Scholar

Witkowicz R. 1998. Porównanie plonowania oraz wartości przedplonowej wsiewek roślin motylkowatych i traw na glebie lekkiej. Rocz. AR Poznań CCCVII, Ser. Rol. 52: 65 — 70.
Google Scholar


Published
2013-03-31

Cited by

Płaza, A. (2013) “The influence of undersown crops on yield of table potato cultivated in integrated production system ”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (267), pp. 79–86. doi: 10.37317/biul-2013-0052.

Authors

Anna Płaza 
iro@uph.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczo-Humanistyczny w Siedlcach Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 69
PDF downloads: 52


License

Copyright (c) 2013 Anna Płaza

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>