Table potato fertilization by biomass of intercrops in conditions of East-Central Poland

Anna Płaza

anna.plaza@uph.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska w Siedlcach (Poland)

Feliks Ceglarek


Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska w Siedlcach (Poland)

Milena A. Królikowska


Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska w Siedlcach (Poland)

Małgorzata Próchnicka


Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska w Siedlcach (Poland)

Abstract

The paper presents results of the studies carried out in 2002–2005, which aimed to assess the influence of intercrop fertilization on table potato yield and its structure under conditions of East-Central Poland. The following combinations of intercrop fertilization were applied: control object (without intercrop fertilization), farmyard manure, undersown crop (red clover, Italian ryegrass), stubble catch crop (oil radish, oil radish — mulch). The content of dry mass and macroelements (N, P, K, Ca and Mg) in biomass of intercrops was determined. In the first year after applying intercrop fertilization the potatoes were cultivated. During harvest a total yield and commercial yield of potato tubers were assessed, and after harvest a structure of tuber yield was evaluated. The results obtained in indicated that the highest amount of dry mass and macroelements was introduced into soil with Italian ryegrass and red clover respectively. The fertilizing value of red clover exceeded that of farmyard manure. No significant difference in fertilizing value was found between oil radish and farmyard manure. The plot fertilized with red clover was characterized by the highest proportions of table and seed potatoes, and the lowest participation of small tubers.


Keywords:

mulch, undersown crop fertilization, potato, stubble catch crop fertilization, yield, yield structure

Boligłowa E., Gleń K. 2003. Yielding and quality of potato tubers depending on the kind of organic fertilization and tillage method. EJPAU, Ser. Agronom. Is. 1, 6: 1 — 10.
Google Scholar

Ceglarek F., Płaza A. 2000. Wpływ nawożenia wsiewkami międzyplonowymi na jakość bulw ziemniaka jadalnego uprawianego w rejonie Siedlec. Biul. IHAR 213: 109 — 116.
Google Scholar

Dzienia S., Boligłowa E. 1993. Rola mulczowania w podnoszeniu żyzności i urodzajności gleby. Post. Nauk Rol. 1: 107 — 111.
Google Scholar

Dzienia S., Szarek P. 2000. Efektywność uprawy bezpłużnej oraz międzyplonów i słomy w produkcji ziemniaka. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 470: 145 — 152.
Google Scholar

Dzienia S., Szarek P., Pużyński S. 2004. Plonowanie i jakość ziemniaka w zależności od systemu prawy roli i rodzaju nawożenia organicznego. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 500: 235 — 242.
Google Scholar

Duer I. 1999. Plon suchej masy kilku odmian koniczyny uprawianej w ekologicznym i integrowanym systemie produkcji oraz akumulacja azotu w glebie. Zesz. Nauk. AR Kraków 347: 69 — 77.
Google Scholar

Grześkiewicz H., Trawczyński C. 1997. Poplony ścierniskowe jako nawóz organiczny w uprawie ziemniaka. Biul. Inst. Ziemn. 48: 73 — 82.
Google Scholar

Kuraszkiewicz R., Pałys E. 2002. Wpływ roślin ochronnych na plon masy nadziemnej wsiewek międzyplonowych. Annales UMCS, Sec. E 57: 105 — 112.
Google Scholar

Nowakowski M., Gutmański I., Kostka-Gościniak D., Kaczorowski G. 1997. Międzyplony ścierniskowe odmian gorczycy białej, rzodkwi oleistej i facelii błękitnej jako nawozy zielone i czynniki ograniczania mątwika burakowego w glebie. Biul. IHAR 202: 201 — 211.
Google Scholar

Pleasant B. 2001. Develop a passion for potatoes. Organ. Gard. Vol. 41, Is. 3: 81 — 87.
Google Scholar

Roztropowicz S. 1994. Poplony ścierniskowe jako cenny nawóz organiczny pod ziemniak. Ziemn. Pol. 4: 11 — 14.
Google Scholar

Sadowski W. 1992. Porównanie efektywności obornika, słomy, nawozów zielonych i biohumusu w uprawie ziemniaka. Mat. konf. nauk. „Produkcyjne skutki zmniejszenia nakładów na agrotechnikę roślin uprawnych”. ART Olsztyn: 216 — 222.
Google Scholar

Sawicka B., Kuś J. 2002. Zmienność składu chemicznego bulw ziemniaka w warunkach ekologicznego i integrowanego systemu produkcji. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 489: 273 — 282.
Google Scholar

Songin W. 1998. Międzyplony w rolnictwie proekologicznym. Post. Nauk Rol. 2: 43 — 51.
Google Scholar

Spiertz J. H. J., Haverkort A. J., Verejken P. H. 1996. Environmentally safe and consumer friendly potato production in The Netherlands. 1. Development of ecologically sound productions systems. Potato Res. 39: 371 — 378.
Google Scholar

Witkowicz R. 1998. Porównanie plonowania oraz wartości przedplonowej wsiewek roślin motylkowatych i traw na glebie lekkiej. Rocz. AR Poznań, CCCVII, Ser. Rol. 52: 65 — 70.
Google Scholar


Published
2009-12-31

Cited by

Płaza, A. (2009) “Table potato fertilization by biomass of intercrops in conditions of East-Central Poland”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (254), pp. 137–143. doi: 10.37317/biul-2009-0011.

Authors

Anna Płaza 
anna.plaza@uph.edu.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska w Siedlcach Poland

Authors

Feliks Ceglarek 

Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska w Siedlcach Poland

Authors

Milena A. Królikowska 

Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska w Siedlcach Poland

Authors

Małgorzata Próchnicka 

Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Podlaska w Siedlcach Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 166
PDF downloads: 47


License

Copyright (c) 2009 Anna Płaza, Feliks Ceglarek, Milena A. Królikowska, Małgorzata Próchnicka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>