Evaluation of yield stability of rye cultivars on the basis of parametric and nonparametric methods

Henryk Bujak

henryk.bujak@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Stanisław Jedyński


Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Jan Kaczmarek


Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare parametric and non-parametric methods in G × E interaction analysis. Experimental data were from trials conducted in the years 2005–2007 in Lower Silesia at the following locations: Kondratowice, Krościna Mała, Naroczyce, Tarnów Śląski and Tomaszów Bolesławiecki. Twelve rye cultivars: Fernando, Klawo, Konto, Picasso, Stach, Caroass, Agricolo, Amilo, Bosmo, Motto, Rostockie and Słowiańskie were grown at two levels of cultivation (low input and intensive). Stability evaluation was based on parametric methods: linear regression coefficient (bi), variance of the regression deviations (Sdi), Shukla’s stability variance (2i), Wricke’s ecovalence (Wi2) and Hanson’s statistics (Di). Nonparametric methods included two Hühn’s measures (Si1, Si2), Kang’s parameter (RS) and new measure of stability based on homogeneous groups and coefficient of variability. The hybrid cultivars produced higher yield and were more stable than the open-pollinated cultivars. Hybrid Fernando and open-pollinated cultivar Bosmo were found to be most remarkable. The new method proposed is simple and gives measures highly correlated with yield and thus it can be recommended for selection of stable genotypes. According to the new method, Fernando, Picasso and Konto were the most stable hybrid cultivars.


Keywords:

adaptation, nonparametric measures, parametric measures, rye hybrid cultivars, open-pollinated cultivars, yield stability

Allard R. W., Bradshaw A. D. 1964. Implications of genotype-environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop. Sci. 4: 503 — 508.
Google Scholar

Becker H. C., Leon J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breed. 101: 1 — 23.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z. 1987 a. A model for the analysis of series of experiments repeated at several places over a period of years. I. Theory. Biul. Oc. Odm. 10: 35 — 71.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z. 1987 b. A model for the analysis of series of experiments repeated at several places over a period of years. II. Exemple. Biul. Oc. Odm. 10: 35 — 71.
Google Scholar

Eberhart S. A., Russell W. A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop. Sci. 6: 36 — 40.
Google Scholar

Fox P. N., Skovmand B., Thompson B., Braun H. J., Cormier R. 1990. Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica 47: 57 — 64.
Google Scholar

Hanson W. D. 1970. Genotypic stability. Theor. Appl. Gen. 40: 226 — 231.
Google Scholar

Hühn M. 1990 a. Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part 1 Theory. Euphytica 47: 189 — 194.
Google Scholar

Hühn M. 1990 b. Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part 2 Application. Euphytica 47: 195 — 201.
Google Scholar

Hühn M. 1996. Nonparametric analysis of genotype × environment interaction by ranks. In: Kang M. S., Gauch H. G. (eds.). Genotype by environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA: 213 — 228.
Google Scholar

Kang M. S. 1988. A rank sum method for selecting high yielding and stable crop genotypes. Cereal Res. Commun. 16: 113 — 115.
Google Scholar

Lerner I. M. 1954. Genetic homeostasis. Oliver and Boyd, London.
Google Scholar

Lin C. S., Binns M. R., Levkowitch L. P. 1986. Stability analysis: where do we stand? Crop Sci. 26: 894 — 900.
Google Scholar

Mohammadi R., Abdulahi A., Haghparast R., Armian M. 2007. Interpreting genotype × environment interactions for durum wheat grain yields using nonparametric methods. Euphytica 157: 239 — 251.
Google Scholar

Mohammadi R., Amri A. 2008. Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in variable environments. Euphytica 159: 419 — 432.
Google Scholar

Sabaghania N., Dehghani H., Sabaghpour. 2006. Nonparametric methods for interpreting genotype × environment interaction of lentil genotypes. Crop Sci. 46: 1100 — 1106.
Google Scholar

Scapim C. A., Oliveira V. R., Braccini A. L., Cruz C. D., Andrade C. A. B., Vidigal M. C. G. 2000. Yield stability in maize (Zea mays L.) and correlations among the parameters of the Eberhart and Russell, Lin and Binn and Hühn models. Genet. Mol. Biol. 23: 387 — 393.
Google Scholar

Shukla G. K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity 29: 237 — 245.
Google Scholar

Wricke G. 1962. Über eine Methode zur Erfassung der ökologischen Streubereite in Feldversuchen. Z. Pflanzenzüchtung 47: 92 — 96.
Google Scholar


Published
2008-12-31

Cited by

Bujak, H., Jedyński, S. and Kaczmarek, J. (2008) “Evaluation of yield stability of rye cultivars on the basis of parametric and nonparametric methods”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (250), pp. 189–201. doi: 10.37317/biul-2008-0016.

Authors

Henryk Bujak 
henryk.bujak@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Stanisław Jedyński 

Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Jan Kaczmarek 

Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 41
PDF downloads: 23


License

Copyright (c) 2008 Henryk Bujak, Stanisław Jedyński, Jan Kaczmarek

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>