Yield of oat in relation to fertilization with microelements

Wojciech Kozera

biuro.dziekana.wrib@pbs.edu.pl
Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Wydział Rolniczy, Akademia Techniczno-Rolnicza, Bydgoszcz (Poland)

Edward Majcherzak


Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Wydział Rolniczy, Akademia Techniczno-Rolnicza, Bydgoszcz (Poland)

Bożena Barczak


Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Wydział Rolniczy, Akademia Techniczno-Rolnicza, Bydgoszcz (Poland)

Krystian Nowak


Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Wydział Rolniczy, Akademia Techniczno-Rolnicza, Bydgoszcz (Poland)

Abstract

In the years 1999–2001, the one-factor field experiment was carried out, in which grain yield, content of proteins and total nitrogen in the oat grain were determined. The oat was foliar fertilized with solutions of microelements (Cu, Zn, Mn, Mo, B) in a form of individual inorganic salts and as a multi-component fertilizer (called Mikrochelat Gama) containing chelated constituents. Foliar applying of copper, manganese, zinc and molybdenum significantly increased yield of the oat grain. Foliarly applied molybdenum was the only microelement that significantly raised the total nitrogen content in the tested oat grain. Spraying with water solutions of copper, molybdenum, manganese and zinc resulted in a statistically proven increase in grain protein. Under the effect of microelements applied together as multi-component fertilizer Mikrochelat Gama, a significant increase in oat grain and protein yield was achieved.


Keywords:

grain yield, microelements, protein, protein yield

Gąsiorowski H. (red.). 1995. Owies — chemia i technologia. PWRiL, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Nielsen F. H. 2002. The nutritional importance of boron throughout the life cycle of higher animals and humans. In: Boron in plant and animal nutrition. Plenum Publishers, New York: 37 — 50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0607-2_4
Google Scholar

Ruszkowska M., Wojcieska-Wyskupajtys U. 1996. Mikroelementy — fizjologiczne i ekologiczne aspekty ich niedoborów i nadmiarów. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 434: 1 — 11.
Google Scholar

Spiak Z. 2000. Mikroelementy w rolnictwie. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 471: 29 — 34.
Google Scholar

Szewczuk C., Michałojć Z. 2003. Praktyczne aspekty dolistnego dokarmiania roślin. Acta Agroph. 85: 19 — 29.
Google Scholar

Tobiasz-Salach R., Bobrecka-Jamro D. 2003. Wpływ wieloskładnikowych nawozów dolistnych na plonowanie i skład chemiczny owsa. Acta Agroph. 85: 89 — 98.
Google Scholar

Wróbel S. 2000. Poziom plonowania krajowych upraw produkcyjnych owsa a zawartość mikroelementów w glebie i roślinach. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Rol. 471: 609 — 617.
Google Scholar

Ziółek E., Desoń-Barańska B., Szafrański W. 1992. Wpływ nawożenia makro- i mikroelementami na zawartość i skład aminokwasowy białka w ziarnie owsa i jęczmienia jarego w zależności od warunków siedliskowych. Zesz. Nauk AR w Krakowie 32: 375 — 395.
Google Scholar


Published
2006-03-31

Cited by

Kozera, W. (2006) “Yield of oat in relation to fertilization with microelements”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (239), pp. 111–116. doi: 10.37317/biul-2006-0080.

Authors

Wojciech Kozera 
biuro.dziekana.wrib@pbs.edu.pl
Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Wydział Rolniczy, Akademia Techniczno-Rolnicza, Bydgoszcz Poland

Authors

Edward Majcherzak 

Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Wydział Rolniczy, Akademia Techniczno-Rolnicza, Bydgoszcz Poland

Authors

Bożena Barczak 

Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Wydział Rolniczy, Akademia Techniczno-Rolnicza, Bydgoszcz Poland

Authors

Krystian Nowak 

Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Wydział Rolniczy, Akademia Techniczno-Rolnicza, Bydgoszcz Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 21
PDF downloads: 14


License

Copyright (c) 2006 Wojciech Kozera, Edward Majcherzak, Bożena Barczak, Krystian Nowak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.