The attempts to control weed infestation in potatoes cultivated under shields

Part I. Plant response to herbicides

Piotr Pszczółkowski

sekretariat@coboru.gov.pl
Stacja Doświadczalna Oceny Odmian, Uhnin (Poland)

Abstract

The results were obtained in the years 1996–1998 in a field experiment carried out on a soil formed of light loamy sands, representing a good rye complex. Randomized subblocks at 3 replications were applied. The effects of three factors were examined: I – different cultivation technologies, including: a) conventional technology as a control variant, b) the use of polyethylene sheeting, c) the use of polypropylene sheeting, d) double shield using both polyethylene and polypropylene sheeting; II – different methods of potato cultivation: a) mechanical, b) mechanical-chemical with Afalon 50WP at a dose of 2 kg ∙ ha-1, c) with herbicide Racer EC at a dose of 2l ∙ ha -1, d) with herbicide mixture Afalon 50 WP + Command 480 EC at a dose of 1 kg + 0.2 l (respectively) ∙ ha –1; III – different potato cultivars: Aster and Drop. Covering of the soil by both cultivated plants and weeds as well as damage to the plants caused by herbicides were recorded throughout the vegetation period. The mechanical-chemical methods of weed control, as compared with the mechanical cultivation alone, resulted in considerable reduction of both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous weeds as well as in increasing the ratio of soil covering with cultivated plants. The use of shields was found to enhance the development of undesirable phytotoxic symptoms in potato plants. The technologies using either polypropylene or polyethylene sheeting applied as a cover appeared to be safer than that using a double shield containing both a polypropylene and polyethylene sheet.

 

Keywords:

cultivation technology, herbicides, potato cultivars, phytotoxic damage, weed control systems

Ackley J. A., Wilson H. P., Hines T. E. 1996. Weed management programs in potato (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Techn. 10 (2): 354 — 358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00040082
Google Scholar

Badowski M., Domaradzki K., Filipiak K., Franek M., Gołębiowska H., Kieloch R., Kucharski M., Rola H., Rola J., Sadowski J., Sekutowski T., Zawerbny T. 2001. Metodyka doświadczeń biologicznej oceny herbicydów, bioregulatorów i adiuwantów. Cz. I. Doświadczenia polowe. IUNG, Puławy.
Google Scholar

Ceglarek F. Zarzecka K. 1992. Wpływ herbicydu Racer na zachwaszczenie i plonowanie dwóch odmian ziemniaka uprawianych w rejonie Siedlec. Zesz. Nauk. WSR-P w Siedlcach, Roln. 31: 85 — 96.
Google Scholar

Choroszewski P. 1994. Fitotoksyczne działanie herbicydów na rośliny ziemniaka. Ochr. Rośl. 7: 11 — 12.
Google Scholar

Czuba R., Wróbel S. 1983. Konkurencyjność chwastów w pobieraniu składników przez rośliny uprawne. Nowe Roln., 2, 8 — 11.
Google Scholar

Friessleben R. 1984. Untersuchungen zum Anbau von Speisefrühkartoffeln unter perforierter Polyathylenfolie. Arch. Acker-u. Pflanzenbau-u. Bodenkd., Berlin, 28, (2): 133 — 142.
Google Scholar

Graf G., 1988. Interessante Organisation Frühkartoffelwirtschaft in der Bretagne. Kartoffelbau, Jg. 39, 6: 214 — 217.
Google Scholar

Midmose D. J. 1984. Potato (Solanum ssp.) in the tropics. A soil temperature effects on emergence plant development and yield. Field-Crops-Research, 8 (4): 255 — 271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(84)90073-X
Google Scholar

Pawłowski F. Pomykalska A. 1986. Wpływ niektórych czynników agrotechnicznych na zachwaszczenie i plonowanie ziemniaka. Cz. I. Rozwój roślin i zachwaszczenie ziemniaka. Ann. Univ. Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, E, XLI (3): 23 — 33.
Google Scholar

Prośba-Białczyk U., Mydlarski M. 1998. Uprawa ziemniaków na wczesny zbiór przy zastosowaniu osłony z agrowłókniny. Fragm. Agronom., 1 (57): 74 — 84.
Google Scholar

Rola H., Franek M., Widerski K., Grzbiela M. 1999. Badania nad zastosowaniem nowej formulacji chlomazonu (Command 360 CS) do zwalczania chwastów w rzepaku ozimym i jarym. Progress in Plant Protection/Postępy w Ochronie Roślin, 39 (2): 613 — 615.
Google Scholar

Roztropowicz S., Lutomirska B. 1997. Technologia produkcji ziemniaka na wczesny zbiór. W: Produkcja ziemniaków. Technologia — Ekonomika — Marketing. Red. Chotkowski J., IHAR, Bonin: 82 — 98.
Google Scholar

Sawicka B., Skalski J. 1996. Zachwaszczenie ziemniaka w warunkach stosowania herbicydu Sencor 70 WP. Cz. I. Skuteczność chwastobójcza herbicydu. Rocz. Nauk. Roln. A-112, 1–2: 169 — 182.
Google Scholar

Sawicka B. 1997. Stosowanie folii polietylenowej w uprawie wczesnych odmian ziemniaka a zagrożenie roślin chorobami. Mat. Konf. Nauk.: „Ochrona ziemniaka”. Kołobrzeg, 09-10.04: 21 — 26.
Google Scholar

Sawicka B. 1998. Efekty technologiczne i ekonomiczne uprawy wczesnych odmian ziemniaka pod folią polietylenową. Rocz. AR w Poznaniu, CCCVII, Roln. 52: 175 — 182.
Google Scholar

Songin W., Piramowicz W. 1980. Efektywność herbicydów Afalonu i Gramonolu przy uprawie ziemniaków wczesnych. Rocz. Nauk Roln., A-104 (3): 113 — 123.
Google Scholar

Wierzbicka B. 1995. Studia nad przyśpieszoną uprawą wczesnych odmian ziemniaka. Zesz. Nauk. AR-T Olsztyn, Agricult. 61 B, Rozpr. habilit.
Google Scholar

Zarzecka K. 1997. Wpływ pielęgnacji na zachwaszczenie, wysokość i jakość plonu bulw ziemniaka. Rozpr. habilit., 49, Wyd. WSR-P, Siedlce.
Google Scholar

Zarzecka K. 1998. Efekty zwalczania chwastów w ziemniakach w zależności od doboru herbicydów. Pestycydy, 2-3: 55 — 62.
Google Scholar

Zawiślak K., Adamiak J., Jańczak-Tabaszewska D. 1985. Fitotoksyczność herbicydów doglebowych wobec niektórych odmian ziemniaka i chwastów. Acta Acad. Agricult. Techn. Olst., Agricultura, 41: 125 — 137.
Google Scholar


Published
2003-09-30

Cited by

Pszczółkowski, P. (2003) “The attempts to control weed infestation in potatoes cultivated under shields : Part I. Plant response to herbicides”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (228), pp. 249–260. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0109.

Authors

Piotr Pszczółkowski 
sekretariat@coboru.gov.pl
Stacja Doświadczalna Oceny Odmian, Uhnin Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 67
PDF downloads: 23


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Piotr Pszczółkowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.