Attempts to control infestation of potato canopy cultivated under shields

Part III. The effect of weed overgrowth in the stand upon the total and market yield of tubers

Barbara Sawicka

dziekanat.agbioinz@up.lublin.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Rolnicza, Lublin (Poland)

Piotr Pszczółkowski


Stacja Doświadczalna Oceny Odmian Uhnin, Dębowa Kłoda (Poland)

Abstract

Regression analysis was applied to evaluate the dependencies between the level of potato plantation weeding and total and commercial yield of tubers achieved in 1996–1998 in the field experiment performed on the soil formed of light loamy sands classified as a good rye complex. Experimental methods and study conditions were described in Part I of the paper. Significant dependence of both the total and commercial tuber yield on fresh and dry matter of weeds determined before tuber harvest was found. The relationship between the decrease of the total or commercial yield and the increase of the content of dry matter of weeds was of parabolic character in each control system. Air-dry matter of weeds appeared to be a more estimate than fresh matter (or weed number) to assess yield losses. It can be used to determine weed threshold values for potato crops.


Keywords:

control systems, cultivars, cultivations under shield, herbicides, indexes, potato, weed, weed infestation

Ackley J. A., Wilson H. P., Hines T. E. 1996. Weed management programs in potato (Solanum tuberosum) with rimsulfuron. Weed Techn. 10 (2): 354 — 358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00040082
Google Scholar

Barralis G. 1977. Senils de nuisibilité des mauvaises herbes. IV. Determination et utilisation des senils de nuisibilité. Phytoma, 29: 290.
Google Scholar

Becker G. 1962. Unkraut- und Bearbeitungseinfluss bei der Kartoffelpflege. Z. Acker Pflanzenbau, 115 (2): 177 — 185.
Google Scholar

Ceglarek F. Zarzecka K. 1992. Wpływ herbicydu Racer na zachwaszczenie i plonowanie dwóch odmian ziemniaka uprawianych w rejonie Siedlec. Zesz. Nauk. WSR-P w Siedlcach, Roln. 31: 85 — 96.
Google Scholar

Czuba R., Wróbel S. 1983. Konkurencyjność chwastów w pobieraniu składników przez rośliny uprawne. Nowe Roln. 2: 8 — 11.
Google Scholar

Gauvrit C. 1996. Efficacité et sélectivité des herbicides. INRA, Paris.
Google Scholar

Hess D. 1985. Weed Physiology. In: Herbicide Physiology, Duke S. (ed.) ERC Press Inc., London: 181 — 214.
Google Scholar

Kacperska A. 1998. Reakcje roślin na czynniki stresowe W: Podstawy fizjologii roślin. Red. J. Kopcewicz, S. Lewak, PWN, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Kirkwood R. C. 1991. Target sites for herbicide Action. Plenum Press, New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2433-9
Google Scholar

Kołpak R., Byszewska-Wzorek A., Płodowska J. 1988. Wpływ herbicydów na wysokość i jakość plonu ziemniaków. Rocz. Nauk. Rol., A-106 (4): 171 — 183.
Google Scholar

Kranz J., Royale D. L. 1978. Perspectives in mathematical modelling of plant disease epidemics. Plant disease epidemiology. Ed. Scott P.R. Bainbridge A. Blackwell-Sci. Public.
Google Scholar

Langton S. J., Harvey R. G., Albright J. W. 1997. Efficiency of clomazone applied at various timings in Soybean (Glycyne max). Weed Tech. 11 (1): 105 — 109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00041427
Google Scholar

Maykuhus F. 1988. Erfahrungen mit Racer bei der Unkraut bekämpfung in Kartoffeln. Kartoffelbau, 39 (2): 46 — 48.
Google Scholar

Nelson D. C., Thoreson M. C. 1981. Competition between potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) and weeds. Weed Sci. 29: 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S004317450004025X
Google Scholar

Pawłowski F., Budzyńska B., Dąbek-Gad M., Grotkowska Z. 1991. Próba ustalenia progu szkodliwości chwastnicy jednostronnej (Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P.B.) w uprawie ziemniaka. Annales UMCS, E-46 (1): 1 — 6.
Google Scholar

Pomykalska A. 1991: Badanie nad określeniem progów szkodliwości chwastów w łanie ziemniaków. Rocz. Nauk Rol. A-109 (2): 21 — 35.
Google Scholar

Pruszyński S. (red.). 2002. Zalecenia ochrony roślin na lata 2002/03. Cz. II. Rośliny rolnicze. Wyd. IOR, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Radecki A. 1977. Badania możliwości ograniczania zabiegów pielęgnacyjnych w uprawie ziemniaków. Cz. III. Badania zależności plonowania ziemniaków od stopnia ich zachwaszczenia. Rocz. Nauk Rol., A-102 (4): 21 — 33.
Google Scholar

Rola H., Franek M., Widerski K., Grzbiela M. 1999. Badania nad zastosowaniem nowej formulacji chlomazonu (Command 360 CS) do zwalczania chwastów w rzepaku ozimym i jarym. Progress in Plant Protection/Post. w Ochr. Rośl., 39 (2): 613 — 615.
Google Scholar

Sawicka B. 1996. Zachwaszczenie ziemniaka w warunkach stosowania herbicydu Sencor 70 WP. Cz. II. Wpływ zachwaszczenia łanu na plon ogólny i handlowy bulw. Rocz. Nauk Rol., A-112 (1-2): 183 — 191.
Google Scholar

Sawicka B., Skalski J. 1996. Zachwaszczenie ziemniaka w warunkach stosowania herbicydu Sencor 70 WP. Cz. I. Skuteczność chwastobójcza herbicydu. Rocz. Nauk Rol. A-112 (1-2): 169 — 182.
Google Scholar

Sawicka B. 2002. Efekty stosowania herbicydów w uprawie Helianthus tuberosus L. Cz. II. Plon i struktura nadziemnych części roślin. Biul. IHAR, 223/224: 397 — 414.
Google Scholar

Scalla R. 1990. Les herbicides. Mode d’action et principes d’utilisation. INRA, Paris.
Google Scholar

Starck Z., Chołuj D., Niemyska B. 1995. Fizjologiczna reakcja roślin na niekorzystne czynniki środowiska. Wyd. SGGW, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Tomlin C. D. S. 1997. The pesticide manual. British Crop Protection Council, Farnham, Surrey.
Google Scholar

Zarzecka K. 1997. Wpływ pielęgnacji na zachwaszczenie, wysokość i jakość plonu bulw ziemniaka. Rozpr. Habilit., 49, Wyd. WSR-P, Siedlce.
Google Scholar

Zarzecka K. 2000. Zależność plonowania ziemniaka od zachwaszczenia. Fragm. Agronom., 2 (66): 120 — 134.
Google Scholar


Published
2003-09-30

Cited by

Sawicka, B. and Pszczółkowski, P. (2003) “Attempts to control infestation of potato canopy cultivated under shields: Part III. The effect of weed overgrowth in the stand upon the total and market yield of tubers ”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (228), pp. 233–247. doi: 10.37317/biul-2003-0108.

Authors

Barbara Sawicka 
dziekanat.agbioinz@up.lublin.pl
Katedra Szczegółowej Uprawy Roślin, Akademia Rolnicza, Lublin Poland

Authors

Piotr Pszczółkowski 

Stacja Doświadczalna Oceny Odmian Uhnin, Dębowa Kłoda Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 63
PDF downloads: 22


License

Copyright (c) 2003 Barbara Sawicka, Piotr Pszczółkowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)