Yielding and grain quality of winter wheat depending on sowing density and on nitrogen fertilization doses

Grażyna Podolska

iung@iung.pulawy.pl
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa, Puławy (Poland)

Sławomir Stankowski


Akademia Rolnicza, Szczecin (Poland)

Abstract

The aim of this research was to determine influence of nitrogen fertilization and sowing density on grain yield and yield quality of winter wheat cv. Kobra and Mikon. The study was conducted in the years 1998–1999 and 1999–2000 in three agrotechnical stations in Błonie-Topola, Osiny, and Jelcz-Laskowice. The factors of this experiments were nitrogen fertilization doses: 0, 40, 80, 120, 160, 200 kg N/ha and sowing density: 1,5, 3,0, 4,5 and 6,0 mln grains/ha. It was found that grain yield depended on nitrogen fertilization and sowing density. Increase of nitrogen fertilization doses had a positive effect on gluten content, Zeleny test result, water absorption, valorimetric value and a negative one on gluten weaking.


Keywords:

variety, grain yield, region of country, quality value, lodging

Cacak-Pietrzak G, Ceglińska A, .Haber T. 1999. Wartość technologiczna wybranych odmian pszenicy ozimej w zależności od zróżnicowanego nawożenia azotem. Pam. Puł. 118: 45 — 56.
Google Scholar

Fotyma E. 1999. Pobranie i wykorzystanie azotu przez pszenice ozimą i jarą. Pam. Puł. 118: 143 — 152.
Google Scholar

Gooding M J, Smith G P. 1998. The potential to use climate, variety and nitrogen relationship to optimise wheat quality. Short communications Fifth Congress ESA vol. 1: 227 — 229.
Google Scholar

Kaczyński L. 1999. Odmiany pszenicy odpowiednie na cele młynarsko-piekarskie, PZM, 7: 2 — 5.
Google Scholar

Kościelniak Wł.1999. Uprawa pszenicy ozimej przy małej ilości wysiewu. Pam. Puł. 118 :207 — 215.
Google Scholar

Kościelniak Wł. 2000. Nowoczesna uprawa pszenicy ozimej i jarej. WODR Łosiów
Google Scholar

Mazurek J, Jaśkiewicz B, Klupczyński Z. 1999. Plonowanie i jakość ziarna pszenicy ozimej w zależności od techniki nawożenia azotem. Pam. Puł. 118: 263 — 270.
Google Scholar

Podolska G. 1997: Reakcja odmian i rodów pszenicy ozimej na wybrane czynniki agrotechniczne. Cz. III Wpływ nawożenia azotem na plon i strukturę plonu nowych odmian i rodów pszenicy ozimej. Biul. IHAR 203: 169 — 172.
Google Scholar

Podolska G, Kaczyński L. 2000. Charakterystyka i technologia uprawy odmian pszenicy ozimej. IHAR, Radzików
Google Scholar

Ruszkowski M. 1981. Metody badań nad określeniem zmian w produktywności odmian zbóż ozimych i jarych pod wpływem zróżnicowanych warunków glebowych i agrotechnicznych. Post. Nauk. Rol. 5: 81 — 95.
Google Scholar

Wójcikiewicz M., Błażej J., Rząsa B. 1995. Produkcyjność pszenicy ozimej przy zróżnicowanym nawożeniu azotowym. Zesz. Nauk. AR, Kraków 32: 125 — 131.
Google Scholar

Wróbel E., Szempliński Wł. 1999. Plonowanie i wartość technologiczna ziarna pszenicy ozimej nawożonej zróżnicowanymi dawkami azotu. Pam. Puł. 118: 464 — 469.
Google Scholar


Published
2001-09-28

Cited by

Podolska, G. and Stankowski, S. (2001) “Yielding and grain quality of winter wheat depending on sowing density and on nitrogen fertilization doses ”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (218/219), pp. 127–136. doi: 10.37317/biul-2001-0042.

Authors

Grażyna Podolska 
iung@iung.pulawy.pl
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa, Puławy Poland

Authors

Sławomir Stankowski 

Akademia Rolnicza, Szczecin Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 1
PDF downloads: 1


License

Copyright (c) 2025 Grażyna Podolska, Sławomir Stankowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)