The impact of cultivation intensity for productivity on hybrid and population cultivars of winter wheat
Marta Jańczak-Pieniążek
mjanczak@ur.edu.plUniwersytet Rzeszowski, Kolegium Nauk Przyrodniczych, Instytut Nauk Rolniczych, Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska, Zakład Produkcji Roślinnej, ul. Zelwerowicza 4, 35‒601 Rzeszów, (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4655-7974
Jan Buczek
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, Kolegium Nauk Przyrodniczych, Instytut Nauk Rolniczych, Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska, Zakład Produkcji Roślinnej, ul. Zelwerowicza 4, 35‒601 Rzeszów (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9760-3603
Renata Tobiasz-Salach
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, Kolegium Nauk Przyrodniczych, Instytut Nauk Rolniczych, Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska, Zakład Produkcji Roślinnej, ul. Zelwerowicza 4, 35‒601 Rzeszów (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-4012
Dorota Bobrecka-Jamro
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, Kolegium Nauk Przyrodniczych, Instytut Nauk Rolniczych, Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska, Zakład Produkcji Roślinnej, ul. Zelwerowicza 4, 35‒601 Rzeszów (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1740-0911
Abstract
The field experiment with winter wheat was conducted in the years 2016-2019 at the Experimental Station of Cultivar Assessment in Przecław. The experimental factors were: I – cultivation technologies with different intensity levels (medium-intensive A1 and high-intensive A2), II – hybrid cultivars and population cultivars of winter wheat. Arrangement of weather conditions had a significant impact on most of the studied parameters, including the quantity and quality of winter wheat yield. Grain yield was higher where technology A2 was applied, as compared to technology A1. Hybrid cv. Hybery had the highest yield-forming potential, while population cv. Belissa and hybrid cv. Hyfi - the lowest. The cultivation of wheat via technology A2 was conducive to obtaining more favourable chlorophyll content in the flag leaf and better grain technological parameters (protein and gluten content and bulk density).
Keywords:
winter wheat, cultivation technology, hybrid cultivars, population cultivarsReferences
Blecharczyk A., Śpitalniak J., Małecka I. 2006. Wpływ doboru przedplonów oraz systemów uprawy roli i nawożenia azotem na plonowanie pszenicy ozimej. Fragm. Agron. 23 (2): 273 — 28
Google Scholar
Borusiewicz A., Załuski D. 2009. Wpływ nawożenia NPK i antywylegacza na strukturalne elementy plonu płaskurki i pszenicy jarej Nawra. Pam. Puław. 151: 21 — 27
Google Scholar
Buczek J., Jarecki W., Bobrecka-Jamro D. 2016. Zmiany zachwaszczenia pszenicy ozimej populacyjnej i mieszańcowej w zależności od technologii produkcji i czynników środowiskowych. Fragm. Agron. 33 (2): 23 — 34
Google Scholar
Cacak-Pietrzak G., Ceglińska A., Torba J., 2005. Wartość przemiałowa wybranych odmian pszenicy z hodowli „Nasiona Kobierzyc”. Pam. Puław. 139: 27 — 38
Google Scholar
COBORU 2016. Lista odmian roślin rolniczych wpisanych do krajowego rejestru w Polsce. Słupia Wielka
Google Scholar
Czarnocki Sz., Turska E., Wielogórska G., Garwacka A. 2009. Wpływ technologii uprawy na architekturę łanu trzech odmian pszenicy ozimej. Ann. UMCS, Sec. E Agricultura. 64 (4): 54 — 61
Google Scholar
Franch B., Vermote E .F., Becker-Reshef I., Claverie M., Huang J., Zhang J., Justice C., Sobrino J. A. 2015. Improving the timeliness of winter wheat production forecast in the United States of America, Ukraine and China using MODIS data and NCAR Growing Degree Day information. Remote Sens. Environ. 161: 131 — 148
Google Scholar
Frant M., Bujak K. 2007. Wpływ uproszczeń w uprawie roli i poziomu nawożenia mineralnego na plonowanie pszenicy ozimej. Fragm. Agron. 22 (2): 46 — 51
Google Scholar
García-Molina D.M., Barro F. 2017. Characterization of changes in gluten proteins in low-gliadin transgenic wheat lines in response to application of different nitrogen regimes. Front. Plant Sci. 8 (257): 1 — 13
Google Scholar
Gąsiorowska B., Makarewicz A. 2007. Wpływ różnych sposobów nawożenia azotem na jakość ziarna odmian pszenicy jarej. Fragm. Agron. 2 (94): 102 — 109
Google Scholar
Gupta P. K., Balyan H. S., Gahlaut V., Saripalli G., Pal B., Basnet B. R., Josh A. K. 2019. Hybrid wheat: past, present and future. Theor. Appl. Genet. 132: 2463 — 2483
Google Scholar
Horvat D., Drezner G., Sudar R., Šimić G., Dvojković K., Španić V., Magdić D. 2015. Distribution of wheat protein components under different genetic backgrounds and environments. Turk J Field Crops. 20 (2): 150 — 154
Google Scholar
https://www.saaten-union.pl
Google Scholar
Iuss Working Group WRB., 2015. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Word Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, update 2015. Word Soil Resources Reports No. 106
Google Scholar
Kara B., Mujdeci M. 2010. Influence of late-season nitrogen application on chlorophyll content and leaf area index in wheat. Sci. Res. Essays. 5 (16): 2299 — 2303
Google Scholar
Longin C. F. H., Mühleisen J., Maurer H. P., Zhang H., Gowda M., Reif J. C. 2012. Hybrid breeding in autogamous cereals. Theor Appl Genet. 125: 1087 — 1096
Google Scholar
Matuschke I., Mishra R. R., Qaim M. 2007. Adoption and impact of hybrid wheat in India. World Dev. 35 (8): 1422 — 1435
Google Scholar
Nowak W., Zbroszczyk T., Kotowicz L. 2004. Wpływ intensywności uprawy na niektóre cechy jakościowe ziarna odmian pszenicy. Pam. Puław. 135: 199 — 212
Google Scholar
Ogihara Y., Takumi S., Handa H. (ed). 2015. Advances in wheat genetics: From genome to field. Proceedings of the 12th International Wheat Genetics Symposium. Chapter 24. Hybrid breeding in wheat
Google Scholar
Okada Y., Whitford R. 2019. Hybrid wheat and abiotic stress. Rajpal V. R., Sehgal D., Kumar A., Raina S. N. (red.) Genomics assisted breeding of crops for abiotic stress tolerance, Vol. 2, Sustainable Development and Biodiversity 21
Google Scholar
Podolska G., Sułek A., 2012. Wpływ intensywności uprawy na plon i cechy struktury plonu odmian pszenicy ozimej. Polish J Agron. 11: 41 — 46
Google Scholar
Reynolds M. P., Rajaram S., McNab A. 1996. Increasing yield. Potential in wheat: Breaking the barriers. Chapter 2. Hybrid wheat: Advances and challenges. CIMMYT. Proceedings of a Workshop Held in Ciudad Obregon, Sonora, Mexico
Google Scholar
Singh S. K., Chatrath R., Mishra B. 2010. Perspective of hybrid wheat research: A review. Indian J. Agric. Sci. 80 (12): 1013 — 1027
Google Scholar
Singh S. P., Srivastava R., Kumar J. 2015. Male sterility systems in wheat and opportunities for hybrid wheat development. Acta Physiol. Plant. 37: 1713
Google Scholar
Whitford R., Fleury D., Reif J. C., Garcia M., Okada T., Korzun V., Langridge P. 2013. Hybrid breeding in wheat: technologies to improve hybrid wheat seed production. J. Exp. Bot. 64 (18): 5411 — 5428
Google Scholar
Wojtkowiak K., Stępień A., Orzech K. 2018. Wpływ nawożenia azotem na elementy składowe plonów, zawartość makroskładników oraz wskaźniki technologiczne w ziarnie czterech odmian pszenicy ozimej (Triticum aestivum ssp. vulgare). Fragm. Agron. 35 (2): 146 — 155
Google Scholar
Živčák M., Olšovská K., Slamka P., Galambošová J., Rataj V., Shao H. B., Kalaji H. M., Brestič M. 2014b. Measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence in different leaf positions may detect nitrogen deficiency in wheat. Zemdirbyste.101 (4): 437 — 444
Google Scholar
Authors
Marta Jańczak-Pieniążekmjanczak@ur.edu.pl
Uniwersytet Rzeszowski, Kolegium Nauk Przyrodniczych, Instytut Nauk Rolniczych, Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska, Zakład Produkcji Roślinnej, ul. Zelwerowicza 4, 35‒601 Rzeszów, Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4655-7974
Authors
Jan BuczekUniwersytet Rzeszowski, Kolegium Nauk Przyrodniczych, Instytut Nauk Rolniczych, Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska, Zakład Produkcji Roślinnej, ul. Zelwerowicza 4, 35‒601 Rzeszów Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9760-3603
Authors
Renata Tobiasz-SalachUniwersytet Rzeszowski, Kolegium Nauk Przyrodniczych, Instytut Nauk Rolniczych, Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska, Zakład Produkcji Roślinnej, ul. Zelwerowicza 4, 35‒601 Rzeszów Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-4012
Authors
Dorota Bobrecka-JamroUniwersytet Rzeszowski, Kolegium Nauk Przyrodniczych, Instytut Nauk Rolniczych, Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska, Zakład Produkcji Roślinnej, ul. Zelwerowicza 4, 35‒601 Rzeszów Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1740-0911
Statistics
Abstract views: 832PDF downloads: 545
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:
- Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
- Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
- Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
- Including the article in a collective work.
- Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
- Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
- Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.
Authors by sending a request for publication:
- They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
- They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
- They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
- They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
- They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Jan Buczek, Marta Jańczak-Pieniążek, Hybrid wheat response to high nitrogen application rates and foliar fertilisation , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 296 (2021): Regular issue
- Aneta Jarecka, Dorota Bobrecka-Jamro, Jan Buczek, Wacław Jarecki, Response of spring wheat to varied intensity of crop production technology , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 287 (2019): Special issue
- Renata Tobiasz-Salach, Dorota Bobrecka-Jamro, Ewa Szpunar-Krok, Jan Buczek, Estimation of the economic value of hull-less oat cultivars grown in the Podkarpackie region , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 244 (2007): Regular issue
- Jan Buczek, Ewa Szpunar-Krok, Renata Tobiasz-Salach, Dorota Bobrecka-Jamro, The effect of post-emergence herbicides on weed infestation and yielding of faba bean , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 244 (2007): Regular issue
- Wacław Jarecki, Dorota Bobrecka-Jamro, Influence of different nitrogen doses on yielding of spring wheat , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 265 (2012): Regular issue
- Renata Tobiasz-Salach, Dorota Bobrecka-Jamro, Ewa Szpunar-Krok, Influence of foliar fertilization on yield and chemical composition of oat grain , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 246 (2007): Regular issue
- Wacław Jarecki, Dorota Bobrecka-Jamro, Reaction of spring wheat, Parabola variety, to leaf feeding with urea and Microcomplex , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 262 (2011): Regular issue