Analysis of yield variability in winter wheat cultivars in South-Western Poland

Ryszard Weber

iung@iung.pulawy.pl
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa, Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Herbologii i Technik Uprawy Roli, Wrocław (Poland)

Henryk Bujak


Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu, Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa (Poland)

Jan Kaczmarek


Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu, Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa (Poland)

Edward Gacek


COBORU Słupia Wielka (Poland)

Abstract

The research was aimed at estimation of the variability of selected winter wheat cultivars and at assessment of their yield stability in particular experimental locations within two voivodeships: Opolskie and Śląskie. The analysis of yield stability in winter wheat cultivars was performed based on the results of post-registration variety testing trials carried out in the voivodeships mentioned. The study covered seven selected locations characterized by diverse soil conditions. The experiments had been set up in two replications by the method of split-block design, the standard tillage mode compared with the intensive variant. To estimate the variability of yielding of the analyzed wheat cultivars at particular locations, multidimensional methods of statistical analysis for repeated experiments were applied. High yields as well as level of adaptation degree found for Boomer and Rapsodia indicate that these particular cultivars should be recommended for growing in the standard tillage mode. On the other hand, cultivars Finezja and Tonacja displayed low and uneven yielding values in both cultivation systems. The genotype-environment interaction revealed that the choice of cultivars for growing in the territories of the voivodeships of Opole and Silesia should depend on the environmental microvariability, which is determined by the edaphic and climatic conditions prevailing at a given site.

Supporting Agencies

Work done as part of the National Post-Registration Variety Experimentation Program coordinated by COBORU

Keywords:

genotype-environment interaction, winter wheat, yield stability

Ahmad R., Qadir S., Ahmad N., Hussain K. 2003. Yield potential and stability of nine wheat varieties under water stress conditions. Int. J. Agr. Biol. 5 (1): 7 — 9.
Google Scholar

Annicchiarico P. 2002. Defining adaptation strategies and yield stability targets in breeding programmers. In M.S. Kang, ed. Quantitative genetics, genomics, and plant breeding: 365 — 383. Wallingford, UK, CABI.
Google Scholar

Annicchiarico P., Russi L., Piano E., Veronesi F. 2006. Cultivar adaptation across Italian locations in four turf grass species. Crop Sci. 46: 264 — 272.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z. 1987. A model for the analysis of series of experiments repeated at several places over a period of years. I. Theory. Biul. Oceny Odm. 10: 7 — 33.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z. 1987. A model for the analysis of series of experiments repeated at several places over a period of years. II. Example. Biul. Oceny Odm. 10: 35 — 71.
Google Scholar

Drzazga T., Paderewski J., Madry W., Krajewski P. 2009. Ocena rodzajów reakcji plonowania odmian pszenicy ozimej w doświadczeniach PDO na przestrzennie zmienne warunki przyrodnicze kraju. Biul. IHAR 253: 71 — 82.
Google Scholar

Eberhart S. A., Russell W. A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36 — 40.
Google Scholar

Gonzalez A., Martin I., Ayerbe L. 2007. Response of barley genotypes to terminal soil moisture stress: phenology, growth, and yield. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 58: 29 — 37.
Google Scholar

Iwańska M., Mądry W., Rajfura A., Drzazga T. 2009. Porównanie syntetycznych wskaźników stopnia szerokiej adaptacji odmian na przykładzie serii doświadczeń przedrejestrowych z pszenicą ozimą. Biul. IHAR 253: 31 — 45.
Google Scholar

Grüneberg W. J., Manrique K., Hang D., Hermann M. 2005. Genotype × environment interactions for a diverse set of sweet potato clones evaluated across varying ecogeographic conditions in Peru. Crop Sci. 45: 2160 — 2171.
Google Scholar

Jankowski P., Zieliński A., Mądry W. 2006. Analiza interakcji genotyp środowisko dla pszenicy ozimej z wykorzystaniem metody graficznej biplot typu GGE część I Metodyka. Biul. IHAR 240/241: 51 — 60.
Google Scholar

Kang M. S. 1993. Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: consequences for growers. Agron. J. 85: 754 — 757.
Google Scholar

Kang M. S. 1998. Using genotype-by-environment interaction for crop cultivar development. Adv. Agronomy 62: 200 — 252.
Google Scholar

Mądry W. 2002. Skuteczność kryterium YS Kanga, opartego na średniej i stabilności plonu w wyborze genotypów zbóż o szerokiej adaptacji w rejonie uprawnym. Roczn. Nauk Roln. Seria A 116:11 — 24.
Google Scholar

Mądry W., Talbot M., Ukalski K., Drzazga T., Iwańska M. 2006. podstawy teoretyczne znaczenia efektów genotypowych i interakcyjnych w hodowli roślin na przykładzie pszenicy ozimej. Biul. IHAR 240/241: 13 — 32.
Google Scholar

Navabi A. Yang R. C., Helm J., Spaner D. M. 2006. Can spring wheat — growing mega environments in the Northern Great Plants be dissected for representative locations or niche-adapted genotypes? Crop Sci. 46: 1107 — 1116.
Google Scholar

Ober E.S., Clark C.J.A., Le Bloa M., Royal A., Jaggard K. W., Pidgeon J. D. 2004. Assessing the genetic resources to improve drought tolerance in sugar beet: agronomic traits of diverse genotypes under droughted and irrigated conditions. Field Crops Research 90: 213 — 234.
Google Scholar

Oleksiak T., Mańkowski D.R. 2005. Interakcja odmian pszenicy ozimej w zmiennych warunkach środowiskowych na podstawie wyników badań ankietowych. Biul. IHAR 235: 5 — 19.
Google Scholar

Roozeboom K. L., Schapaugh W. T., Tuinstra M. T., Vanderlip R. L., Milliken G. A. 2008. Testing wheat in variable environments: genotype, environment, interaction effects, and grouping test locations. Crop. Sci. 48: 117 — 330.
Google Scholar

Shukla G. K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype × environment components of variability. Heredity 29: 237 — 245.
Google Scholar

Thüringer Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft. 2006. Sortenversuche in Thüringen — Stoppelweizen: 1 — 5.
Google Scholar


Published
2011-09-30

Cited by

Weber, R. (2011) “Analysis of yield variability in winter wheat cultivars in South-Western Poland”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (260/261), pp. 121–133. doi: 10.37317/biul-2011-0028.

Authors

Ryszard Weber 
iung@iung.pulawy.pl
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa, Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Zakład Herbologii i Technik Uprawy Roli, Wrocław Poland

Authors

Henryk Bujak 

Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu, Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa Poland

Authors

Jan Kaczmarek 

Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu, Katedra Genetyki, Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa Poland

Authors

Edward Gacek 

COBORU Słupia Wielka Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 235
PDF downloads: 44


License

Copyright (c) 2011 Ryszard Weber, Henryk Bujak, Jan Kaczmarek, Edward Gacek

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>