Yield and grain quality of selected Triticum durum Desf. genotypes depending on nitrogen fertilization and sowing density
Hanna Sulewska
rektorat@up.poznan.plAkademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)
Wiesław Koziara
Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)
Jarosław Bojarczuk
Hodowla Roślin Smolice Sp. z o.o. Grupa IHAR (Poland)
Abstract
In 2005–2006, trials have been established to evaluate growing possibilities of four foreign durum wheat varieties in the conditions of Wielkopolska region (Swadzim near Poznań). Quality of the harvested grain has evaluated. The reaction has been evaluated of four durum wheat varieties Durabon (Germany, Durabonus (Austria), Duraprimus (Austria), Rusticano (Italy) and one common wheat variety Viniett to nitrogen fertilization (0 kg N·ha-1, 50 kg N·ha-1, 100 kg N·ha-1, 150 kg N·ha-1) and sowing density (400, 500, 600 seeds/m2). It was found, that all tested durum wheat varieties yielded at a similar level as the common wheat cv. Viniett. Grain yield of common wheat grew due to the nitrogen fertilization up to the dose of 132.3 kg N·ha-1, and that of durum wheat, to the dose of 141.9 kg N·ha-1 (mean for varieties). Moreover, it was concluded, that durum wheat varieties better reacted to higher sowing density when compared to the variety Viniett. Low values of grain quality parameters, mainly content of β-carotene, make all the tested varieties of Triticum durum Desf. useless for growing in the Wielkopolska region.
Keywords:
durum wheat, nitrogen fertilization, plot density, yield, grain qualityReferences
Abad A., Llovelas J., Michelena A. 2004. Nitrogen fertilization and foliar urea effects on durum wheat yield and quality and on residua soil nitrate in irrigated Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Res. 87: 257 — 269.
Google Scholar
Achremowicz B., Zając J., Styk B. 1993. Wpływ podwyższonego nawożenia azotem na wartość technologiczną niektórych odmian pszenicy jarej i ozimej. Rocz. Nauk Rol. A, 110 (1–2): 149 — 157.
Google Scholar
Ashraf M., Azam F. 1998. Fate and interaction with soil N of fertilizer 15 N applied to wheat at different growth stages. Cereal Res. Commun. 26: 397 — 404.
Google Scholar
Bojarczuk J. 2007. www.ihar.edu.pl/a_moze_pszenica_twarda.php.
Google Scholar
Borek M. 2001. Polski rynek zbóż po akcesji do Unii Europejskiej — system interwencji. Przegląd Zbożowo-Młynarski 10: 10 — 13.
Google Scholar
Ciołek A., Makarska E. 2004. Ocena jakości nowych linii pszenicy twardej na podstawie charakterystyki białek gliadynowych i gluteninowych w warunkach stosowania zróżnicowanego nawożenia azotem. Acta Sci. Pol. Technologia Alimentaria 3 (2): 147 — 155.
Google Scholar
Dexter J. E., Crowle W. L., Matsuo R. R., Kosmolak F. G. 1982. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on the quality characteristic of five North American amber durum wheat cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 62: 601 — 612.
Google Scholar
Johansson E., Prieto-Linde M. L., Jonsson. J. O. 2001. Effects of wheat cultivar and nitrogen application on storage protein composition and breadmaking quality. Cereal Chem. 78: 19 — 25.
Google Scholar
Jurga R. 2001. Granulacja surowców makaronowych z pszenicy durum. Przegląd Zbożowo-Młynarski 8: 11 — 12.
Google Scholar
Kaan I., Nachit M. 1993. Série A: Séminaires Méditerranéens. Options Méditerranéennes 22: 241 — 247.
Google Scholar
Limaux F., Recous S., Maynard J. M., Guckert A. 1999. Relationship between rate of crop growth at date of fertiliser N appilcation and fate of fertiliser N applied to winter wheat. Plant Soil 214: 49 — 59.
Google Scholar
Lopez-Bellido L., Lopez-Bellido R. J., Lopez-Bellido F. J. 2006. Fertilizer nitrogen efficiency in durum wheat under rainfed Mediterranean conditions: Effect of split application. Agron. J. 98: 55 — 62.
Google Scholar
Mazurek J., Ruszkowski M. 1965. Badania nad pszenicą twardą. Pam. Puł. 19: 99 — 121.
Google Scholar
Mazurek J. 1981. Termin i ilość wysiewu oraz nawożenie azotem pszenicy jarej. Wpływ na plon ziarna. Wpływ na technologiczną jakość ziarna. Pam. Puł. 75:
Google Scholar
Mazurek J., Iwanejko M., Podolska G., Sułek A. 1991. Reakcja nowych odmian pszenicy jarej na nawożenie azotem. IUNG Puławy R (288):
Google Scholar
Mocek A., Drzymała S., Maszner P. 1997. Geneza, analiza i klasyfikacja gleb. Wyd. AR Poznań: 416ss.
Google Scholar
Paccuci G., Blanco A. 1973. Agronomic evaluation and technological properties of new durum wheat lines and varietes in Southern Italy. Proc. Symp. on Genetics and Breeding of Durum Wheat. Bari (Italy): 447 — 469.
Google Scholar
Piech M., Lebiedź S. 1982. Ocena wpływu poziomu nawożenia azotem na kształtowanie się cech jakościowych ziarna odmian pszenicy jarej. Zesz. Nauk. AR Szczecin, R. 28 (94): 271 — 280.
Google Scholar
Rachoń L. 1997. Plonowanie i jakość niektórych odmian pszenicy twardej (Triticum durum Desf.). Biul. IHAR 204: 141 — 144.
Google Scholar
Rachoń L. 1999. Plonowanie i jakość pszenicy twardej (Triticum durum Desf.) nawożonej zróżnicowanymi dawkami azotu. Pam. Puł. 118: 349 — 355.
Google Scholar
Rachoń L., Szwed-Urbaś K., Segit Z. 2002. Plonowanie nowych linii pszenicy pszenicy twardej (Triticum durum Desf.) w zależności od poziomu nawożenia azotem i ochrony roślin. Annales UMCS, Sec. E, 57: 71 — 76.
Google Scholar
Rachoń L. 2001. Studia nad plonowaniem i jakością pszenicy twardej (Triticum durum Desf.). Rozprawa habilitacyjna nr 248, Wyd. AR Lublin: 66 ss.
Google Scholar
Rachoń L., Szumiło G. 2002. Plonowanie i jakość niektórych polskich i zagranicznych odmian i linii pszenicy twardej (Triticum durum Desf.). Pam. Puł. 130: 619 — 24.
Google Scholar
Rachoń L. 2004. Ocena przydatności ziarna krajowych i zagranicznych linii i odmian jarej pszenicy twardej (Triticum durum Desf.) do produkcji makaronu. Biul. IHAR 231: 129 — 137.
Google Scholar
Royo C., Michelena A., Carrillo J. M., García P., Juan-Aracil, J., Soler C. 1998. Spanish durum breeding program. In: Proceedings of the Sewana Durum Network Workshop. Sewana (South Europe, West Asia and North Africa) Durum Research Network.
Google Scholar
Schelling A. S., Abaye A. O., Griffey C. A., Brann D. E., Alley M. M., Pridgen T. H. 2003. Adaptation and performance of winter durum wheat in Virginia. Agron. J. 95: 642 — 651.
Google Scholar
Seidel W., Sievart D. 1997. Internationale Durumweizen Situation in den Getreidewirtschaftsjahren 1994/95 und 1995/96. Getreide Mehl und Brot 51, 1: 10 — 14.
Google Scholar
Szwed-Urbaś K. 1993. Zmienność ważniejszych cech użytkowych jarej pszenicy twardej z uwzględnieniem interakcji genotypowo-środowiskowej. Rozprawa habilitacyjna nr 159. Wyd. AR Lublin: 56 ss.
Google Scholar
Szwed-Urbaś K., Segit Z., Grundas S. 1995. Wstępna ocean jakości ziarna pszenicy twardej w warunkach Lubelszczyzny. Biul. IHAR 194: 149 — 154.
Google Scholar
Szwed-Urbaś K., Segit Z., Mazurek H. 1997. Parametry jakościowe ziarna krajowych linii pszenicy twardej. Biul. IHAR 204: 129 — 139.
Google Scholar
Woźniak A. 2006. Plonowanie i jakość ziarna pszenicy jarej zwyczajnej (Triticum aestivum L.) i twardej (Triticum durum Desf.) w zależności od poziomu agrotechniki. Acta Agrophisica 8 (3): 755 — 763.
Google Scholar
Authors
Wiesław KoziaraAkademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu Poland
Authors
Jarosław BojarczukHodowla Roślin Smolice Sp. z o.o. Grupa IHAR Poland
Statistics
Abstract views: 159PDF downloads: 31
License
Copyright (c) 2007 Hanna Sulewska, Wiesław Koziara, Jarosław Bojarczuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:
- Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
- Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
- Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
- Including the article in a collective work.
- Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
- Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
- Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.
Authors by sending a request for publication:
- They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
- They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
- They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
- They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
- They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Katarzyna Panasiewicz, Wiesław Koziara, Hanna Sulewska, The response of winter wheat Triticum durum Desf. cv Komnata to different sowing density and nitrogen fertilization , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 253 (2009): Regular issue
- Władysław Kadłubiec, Rafał Kuriata, Jarosław Bojarczuk, Estimation of variability and interrelationships among various traits in durum wheat lines , Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute: No. 249 (2008): Regular issue
