Evaluation of genotype-environment interaction and yield stability of winter wheat varieties

Dariusz Zalewski

dariusz.zalewski@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Wrocław (Poland)

Ryszard Weber


Zakład Technik Uprawy Roli, Instytut Uprawy, Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa, Jelcz-Laskowice (Poland)

Abstract

Yield stability of 8 winter wheat varieties was investigated in the region of Lower Silesia (Poland) in the years 2001–2003. The yields of six environments (Jelenia Góra, Kobierzyce, Wrocław, Tomaszów Bolesławiecki, Naroczyce, Jelcz-Laskowice), diverse in regard to soil conditions, were compared in the standard and intensive variants of cultivation. The intensive variant, in comparison with the standard one, differed by 40 kg/ha higher level of nitrogen fertilization, a complete chemical protection against fungal diseases, application of anti-lodging agents, and foliar feeding of plants with a multi-component preparation. The recently registered cultivars: Jawa, Kobra, Korweta, Kris, Mewa, Sakwa, Soraja and Zyta were the objects of the study. Statistical analysis was carried out according to the computer program Sergen 3 (Caliński, 1998). Analyses of interaction G  E, joint regression and principal components were applied. The cultivars Kris and Soraja were the best yielder in the standard system, whereas cultivars Kris and Jawa gave high yields in an intensive system. The cultivar Korweta gave low yield in both systems. The considerable differences in yields in some localities suggest the need of testing new varieties in many environments, because of the significant genotype × environment interaction.

Supporting Agencies

The work was carried out as part of the National Variety Experimentation Program coordinated by COBORU

Keywords:

genotype × environment interaction, principal components, winter wheat, stability, joint regression

Becker H. C., Leon J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101: 1 — 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z., Krajewski P., Siatkowski I. 1998. Podręcznik użytkownika programu Sergen 3. Poznań 1998: 5 — 59.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z. 1987. A model for the analysis of a series of experiments repeated at several places over a period of years. I. Theory. Biuletyn Oceny Odmian 1–2 (17–18): 7 — 33.
Google Scholar

Dao T. H., Nguyen H. T. 1989. Growth response of cultivars to conservation tillage in a continuous wheat cropping system. Agron. J. 81 (6): 923 — 929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1989.00021962008100060015x
Google Scholar

Domitruk D. R., Duggan B. L., Flowler D. B. 2001. Genotype-environment interaction of no-till winter wheat in Western Canada. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 81: 7 — 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/P00-005
Google Scholar

Drzazga T., Krajewski P. 2001. Zróżnicowanie środowisk pod względem stopnia interakcji w seriach doświadczeń z pszenicą. Biul. IHAR 218/219: 111 — 115.
Google Scholar

Galek R, Bujak H., Kaczmarek J., 2000. Ocena stabilności cech bonitacyjnych i technologicznych w kolekcji żyta jarego na podstawie pięciu parametrów statystycznych. Biul. IHAR 216: 69 — 77.
Google Scholar

Kaczyński L. 1999. Reakcja odmian roślin rolniczych na czynniki środowiska, niezbędny zakres doświadczeń PDO na Dolnym Śląsku. Podstawy organizacji i planowania doświadczalnictwa z zarejestrowanymi odmianami roślin uprawnych na Dolnym Śląsku. Zesz. 1: 35 — 46.
Google Scholar

Lista Opisowa Odmian. 2004. Praca zbiorowa COBORU, Słupia Wielka.
Google Scholar

McGuire A. M., Bryant D. C., Denison R. F. 1998. Wheat yields, nitrogen uptake and soil following winter legume cover crop vs. fallow. Agron. Crop. Sci. 180: 215 — 222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1998.00021962009000030015x
Google Scholar

Olness A., Evans S. D., Alderfer R. 1998. Calculation of optimal fertilizer rates: A comparison of three response models. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 180: 215 — 222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1998.tb00527.x
Google Scholar

Podolska G. 1997. Reakcja odmian i rodów pszenicy ozimej na wybrane czynniki agrotechniczne. Część III. Wpływ nawożenia azotem na plon i strukturę plonu nowych odmian i rodów pszenicy ozimej. Biul. IHAR 204: 169 — 180.
Google Scholar

Podolska G. 2004. Efektywność agrotechnicznych oddziaływań w wykorzystaniu potencjału plonowania pszenicy ozimej. Biul. IHAR 231: 55 — 64.
Google Scholar

Sieling K., Schröder H., Finck M., Hanus H. 1998. N uptake and apparent N-use efficiency of winter wheat and winter barley grown in different cropping systems. J. Agricul. Sci. Cambridge, 131: 375 — 387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859698005838
Google Scholar

Stankowski S., Podolska G., Pacewicz K. 2004.Wpływ nawożenia azotem na plonowanie i jakość ziarna odmian pszenicy ozimej. Annales UMCS, Sec. E, 59, 3: 1363 — 1671.
Google Scholar

Varga B., Svecnjak Z., Pospisil A. 2001. Winter wheat cultivar performance as affected by production systems in Croatia. Agron. J. 93: 961 — 966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.935961x
Google Scholar

Varga B., Svecnjak Z., Pospisil A. 2000.Grain yield and yield components of winter wheat grown in two management systems. Bodenkultur 3: 145 — 150.
Google Scholar


Published
2006-12-31

Cited by

Zalewski, D. and Weber, R. (2006) “Evaluation of genotype-environment interaction and yield stability of winter wheat varieties”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (242), pp. 33–43. doi: 10.37317/biul-2006-0004.

Authors

Dariusz Zalewski 
dariusz.zalewski@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy, Wrocław Poland

Authors

Ryszard Weber 

Zakład Technik Uprawy Roli, Instytut Uprawy, Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa, Jelcz-Laskowice Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 11
PDF downloads: 2


License

Copyright (c) 2006 Dariusz Zalewski, Ryszard Weber

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)