The effect of genotype-environment interaction on yielding of winter wheat

Ryszard Weber

iung@iung.pulawy.pl
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa w Puławach, Zakład Technik Uprawy Roli i Nawożenia, Jelcz-Laskowice (Poland)

Dariusz Zalewski


Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza, Wrocław (Poland)

Abstract

Yields of eight cultivars of winter wheat were evaluated in post-registration (recommended list) trials in Lower Silesia in the years 2001-2003. The experiments were conducted in standard and intensive cropping systems at five locations differing in weather and soil conditions. Wheat cultivars Kris, Jawa and Kobra were the best yields in both systems. A low level of nitrogen fertilization and no treatment with fungicides resulted in low yields of cvs Zyta and Soraja in a standard cropping system. Discriminatory analysis revealed the influence of environmental conditions (locations) upon yield variation. The cultivars yielded significantly higher on highly fertile very good or good wheat complexes (soils suitable for growing wheat and rye) than on defective wheat complex or very good rye complex.

Supporting Agencies

The work was carried out as part of the National Post-Registration Variety Experimentation Program coordinated by COBORU.

Keywords:

discriminatory analysis, G × E interaction, winter wheat yields

Blankenau K., Olfs H. W., Kuhlmann H. 2002. Strategies to improve the use efficiency of mineral fertilizer nitrogen applied to winter wheat. J. Agronomy Crop Sci. 188: 146 — 154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037X.2002.00548.x
Google Scholar

Budzyński W., Borysiewicz J., Bielski S. 2004. Wpływ poziomu nawożenia azotem na plonowanie i wartość technologiczną ziarna pszenicy ozimej. Pam. Puł. 135: 33 — 44.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Chudzik H. 1980. Grupowanie populacji na podstawie wyników wielozmiennej analizy wariancji. Algorytmy Biometryczne i Statystyczne. 9: 139 — 167.
Google Scholar

Camara K. M., Payne W. A., Rasmussen P. E. 2003. Long-term effects of tillage, nitrogen and rainfall on winter wheat yields in the Pacific Northwest. Agron. J. 95: 828 — 835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.8280
Google Scholar

Chwil S. 2004. Ocena skutków nawożenia azotem pszenicy ozimej. Fragm. Agron. 1 (81): 19 — 28.
Google Scholar

Domaradzki K. 2004. Wpływ terminu, dawki i sposobu stosowania herbicydów na stężenie pozostałości substancji aktywnych w ziarnie zbóż. Pam. Puł. 135: 45 — 54.
Google Scholar

Domitruk D. R., Duggan B. L., Fowler D. B. 2001. Genotype-environment interaction of no-till winter wheat in Western Canada. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 81: 7 — 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/P00-005
Google Scholar

Duer I., Faber A., Feledyn-Szewczyk B., Gałązka R. 2004. Programy rolno środowiskowe jako instrument wsparcia rolników. Warsztaty szkoleniowe Puławy 18.11.2004: 2 — 69.
Google Scholar

Foulkes M. J., Scott R. K., Sylvester-Bradley R. 2001. The ability of wheat cultivars to withstand drought in UK conditions: resource capture. J. Agric. Sci., Cambride 137: 1 — 16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859601001149
Google Scholar

Gupta N. K., Gupta S., Kumar A. 2001. Effect of water stress on physiological attributes and their relationship with growth and yield of wheat cultivars at different stages. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 186: 55 — 61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037x.2001.00457.x
Google Scholar

Jończyk K. 2002. Reakcja wybranych odmian pszenicy ozimej na uprawę w różnych systemach produkcji roślinnej. Pam. Puł. 130 (1): 339 — 345.
Google Scholar

Kulig B., Kania S., Szafrański W., Zając T. 2001. Reakcja wybranych odmian pszenicy ozimej na intensywność uprawy. Biul. IHAR 218/219: 117 — 126.
Google Scholar

Krzyśko M. 1990. Analiza Dyskryminacyjna. Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Mądry W. 1993. Studia statystyczne nad wielowymiarową oceną zróżnicowania cech ilościowych w kolekcjach zasobów genowych zbóż. Wydawn. SGGW, Warszawa.
Google Scholar

Mittler S. 2000. Ökovariabilität von Winterweizen unter Standortbedingungen Nordostdeutschlands. Dissertation Landwirtschaftlich-Gärtnerischen Fakultät der Humboldt Universität zum Berlin, 4 — 155.
Google Scholar

Olness A., Evans S. D., Alderfer R. 1998. Calculation of optimal fertilizer rates: A comparison of three response models. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 180: 215 — 222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.1998.tb00527.x
Google Scholar

Podolska G. 2004. Efektywność agrotechnicznych oddziaływań w wykorzystaniu potencjału plonowania pszenicy ozimej. Biul. IHAR 231: 55 — 64.
Google Scholar

Sieling K, Schröder H., Finck M., Hanns H. 1998. Yield, N uptake and apparent N — use efficiency of winter wheat and winter barley grown in different cropping systems. J. Agric. Sci. Cambridge 131: 375 — 387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859698005838
Google Scholar

Vraga B., Svecjak Z., Pospisil A. 2000. Grain yield and yield components of winter wheat grown in two management systems. Die Bodenkultur 3: 145 — 150.
Google Scholar

Weisz R., Bowman D.T. 1999. Influence of tillage system on soft red winter wheat cultivar selection. J. Prod. Agric. 12 (3): 415 — 418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1999.0415
Google Scholar


Published
2006-09-29

Cited by

Weber, R. and Zalewski, D. (2006) “The effect of genotype-environment interaction on yielding of winter wheat”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (240/241), pp. 33–42. doi: 10.37317/biul-2006-0032.

Authors

Ryszard Weber 
iung@iung.pulawy.pl
Instytut Uprawy Nawożenia i Gleboznawstwa w Puławach, Zakład Technik Uprawy Roli i Nawożenia, Jelcz-Laskowice Poland

Authors

Dariusz Zalewski 

Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza, Wrocław Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 156
PDF downloads: 34


License

Copyright (c) 2006 Ryszard Weber, Dariusz Zalewski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>