Assessment of genetic similarity of spelt (Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta L.) cultivars based on RAPD markers

Sylwia Okoń

sylwia.okon@up.lublin.pl
Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli I Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie (Poland)

Edyta Paczos-Grzęda


Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli I Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie (Poland)

Piotr Kraska


Katedra Ekologii Rolniczej, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie (Poland)

Ewa Kwiecińska-Poppe


Katedra Ekologii Rolniczej, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie (Poland)

Edward Pałys


Katedra Ekologii Rolniczej, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie (Poland)

Abstract

The paper contains an analysis of genetic similarity of 8 Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta cultivars done using RAPD markers. Seventeen selected primers produced 175 fragments, out of which 80 were polymorphic and 7 were genotype-specific. RAPD-based genetic similarity was estimated to be between 8.851 and 0.913. The mean genetic similarity was calculated at 0.868. Genetic similarity matrix was applied for cluster analysis through UPGMA method. The data obtained indicate that the analyzed spelt cultivars are characterized by high similarity.


Keywords:

RAPD, Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta L., genetic similarity

Achleitner A., Tinker N.A., Zechner E., Buerstmayr H. 2008. Genetic diversity among oat varieties of worldwide origin and associations of AFLP markers with quantitative traits. Theor. Appl. Genet. 117: 1041 — 1053.
Google Scholar

Baumagärtel-Blaschke U. 1991. Dinkel für die neue deutsche Küche. DLG — Mitteilungen, 106, 12: 44 — 47.
Google Scholar

Cheng Z., Huang H. 2009. SSR fingerprinting Chinese peach cultivars and landraces (Prunus persica) and analysis of their genetic relationships. Scientia Hortic. 120: 188 — 193.
Google Scholar

Doyle J. J., Doyle J. L. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11 — 15.
Google Scholar

Drossou A., Katsiotis A., Leggett J. M., Loukas M., Tsakas S. 2004. Genome and species relationships in genus Avena based on RAPD and AFLP molecular markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 48 — 54.
Google Scholar

Du J. K., Yao Y. Y., Ni Z. F., Peng H. R., Sun Q. X. 2002. Genetic diversity revealed by ISSR molecular marker in common wheat, spelt, compacted and progeny of recurrent selection. Acta Genet. Sin. 29 (5): 445 — 452.
Google Scholar

Grela E., Pałys E., Günther K. D. 1993. Skład chemiczny i wartość pokarmowa ziarna orkiszu (Triticum spelta) w żywieniu świń. Mat. Sympozjum Naukowego nt.: „Produkcja zwierzęca a środowisko przyrodnicze”. Wyd. AR Lublin, 214 — 222.
Google Scholar

Ikegami H., Nogata H., Hirashima K., Awamura M., Nakahara T. 2009. Analysis of genetic diversity among European and Asian fig varieties (Ficus carica L.) using ISSR, RAPD, and SSR markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 56:201 — 209.
Google Scholar

Kochieva E. Z., Goryunova S. V., Pomortsev A. A. 2001. RAPD analysis of the genome in species of the genus Hordeum. Rus. J. Genet. 37 (8): 905 — 910.
Google Scholar

Marillia E. F., Scoles G. J. 1996. The use of RAPD markers in Hordeum phylogeny. Genome 39 (4): 646 — 54.
Google Scholar

Nei M., Li W. H. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 76: 5269 — 5273.
Google Scholar

Rohlf F. J. 2001. NTSYS-pc numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 5.1.Exeter Publishing Ltd., Setauket, N.Y.
Google Scholar

Sun Q., Ni Z., Liu Z., Gao J., Huang T. 1998. Genetic relationships and diversity among Tibetan wheat, common wheat and European spelt wheat revealed by RAPD markers. Euphytica 99: 205 — 211.
Google Scholar

Sztuba-Solińska J. 2005. Systemy markerów molekularnych i ich zastosowanie w hodowli roślin. Kosmos 54 (2–3): 227 — 239.
Google Scholar

Vinod K. Y., Sandeep K., Ravindra K. P. 2007. Measurement of genetic dissimilarity in fieldpea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes using RAPD markers. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 54 (6): 1285 — 1289.
Google Scholar

Virk P. S., Ford-Lloyd B. V., Jackson M. T., Newbury H. J. 1995 Use of RAPD for the study of diversity within plant germplasm collections. Heredity 74: 170 — 179.
Google Scholar

Williams J. G. K., Kubelik A. R., Livak K. J., Rafalski J. A, Tingey S. V. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucl. Acid. Res. 18: 6531 — 6535.
Google Scholar

Yang X., Liu P., Han Z., NI Z., Sun Q. 2005. Genetic diversity revealed by genomic-SSR and EST-SSR markers among common wheat, spelt and compacted. Progr. Nat. Sci. 15 (1):24 — 33.
Google Scholar


Published
2009-06-30

Cited by

Okoń, S. (2009) “Assessment of genetic similarity of spelt (Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta L.) cultivars based on RAPD markers”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (252), pp. 35–41. doi: 10.37317/biul-2009-0053.

Authors

Sylwia Okoń 
sylwia.okon@up.lublin.pl
Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli I Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie Poland

Authors

Edyta Paczos-Grzęda 

Instytut Genetyki, Hodowli I Biotechnologii Roślin, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie Poland

Authors

Piotr Kraska 

Katedra Ekologii Rolniczej, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie Poland

Authors

Ewa Kwiecińska-Poppe 

Katedra Ekologii Rolniczej, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie Poland

Authors

Edward Pałys 

Katedra Ekologii Rolniczej, Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy w Lublinie Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 35
PDF downloads: 39


License

Copyright (c) 2009 Sylwia Okoń, Edyta Paczos-Grzęda, Piotr Kraska, Ewa Kwiecińska-Poppe, Edward Pałys

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>