Yielding stability and adaptation of spring barley cultivars to the conditions of Poland

Tadeusz Oleksiak

t.oleksiak@ihar.edu.pl
Pracownia Ekonomiki Nasiennictwa i Hodowli Roślin, Zakład Nasiennictwa i Nasionoznawstwa, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie (Poland)

Dariusz R. Mańkowski


Pracownia Ekonomiki Nasiennictwa i Hodowli Roślin, Zakład Nasiennictwa i Nasionoznawstwa, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie (Poland)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-8016

Abstract

Interaction of genotypes with environment (determined by soil quality, agriculture technology level, climate) makes a choice of correct genotypes for breeding difficult and influences future cultivation effects. Estimation of yielding stability in changeable production conditions may be useful for choice of genotypes adapted to specific climate, soil or agriculture technology. The aim of this study was estimation of spring barley yielding stability basing on results of farm survey research within the years 1992–2003. There were following differentiating factors: geographic region of cultivation (according to COBORU), soil quality (soil class and soil acidity), agriculture technology level (mineral fertilization and chemical control). Genotype-environment (G×E) interaction analysis was made using the Sheffé-Caliński mixed model and the Caliński-Kaczmarek joint regression model. Calculations were made using the SERGEN 3 computer program. On the basis of the analyses, the investigated spring barley cultivars were grouped into two classes; yielding stable, considering the agricultural point of view (reacting proportionally to a change of cultivation conditions), and unstable ones (showing significant interaction with environment). The unstable varieties where divided into three another groups: intensive ones (reacting with yields higher than proportionally to more favorable conditions), extensive ones (reacting with yields relatively lower than proportionally to less favorable conditions) and those reacting irregularly to the environment (we are not able to describe the reaction by any linear regression function).


Keywords:

survey research, stability analysis, genotype-environment interaction, spring barley

Atlin G. N., McRae K. B., Lu X. 2000. Genotype × region interaction for two-row barley yield in Canada. Crop. Sci. 40: 1 — 6.
Google Scholar

Becker H. C., Léon J. 1988. Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 101: 1 — 23.
Google Scholar

Bujak H., Kaczmarek J., Chrzanowska-Drożdż B., Liszewski M. 2003. Interakcja genotypowo-środowiskowa plonowania jęczmienia ozimego na Dolnym Śląsku. Biul. IHAR 226/227 (1): 233 — 241.
Google Scholar

Caliński T. 1966. On the distribution of the F-type statistic in the analysis of a group of experiments. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Series B, 28: 526 — 542.
Google Scholar

Caliński T. 1967. Model analizy wariancji dla doświadczeń wielokrotnych. Rocznik Nauk Rolniczych, Seria A 93, 3: 549 — 579.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z. 1979. Analiza interakcji genotypowo-środowiskowej. 3. Zastosowanie analizy regresji oraz analizy składowych głównych. IX Coll. Metodol. z Agrobiom. PAN, Warszawa: 5 — 28.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z. 1997. A multivariate approach to analysis genotype-environment interactions. In: Krajewski P., Kaczmarek Z. (ed.), Advances in Biometrical Genetics. Poznań: 3 — 14.
Google Scholar

Caliński T., Czajka S., Kaczmarek Z., Krajewski P., Siatkowski I. 1998. SERGEN — Analiza serii doświadczeń odmianowych i genetyczno hodowlanych. Program komputerowy, Poznań, IGR.
Google Scholar

Eberhart S. A., Russel W. A. 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36 — 40.
Google Scholar

Jankowski P., Zieliński A., Mądry W. 2006. Analiza interakcji genotyp-środowisko dla pszenicy ozimej z wykorzystaniem metody graficznej biplot typu GGE. Część I. Podstawy teoretyczne. Biul. IHAR 240/241: 53 — 60.
Google Scholar

Kaczmarek Z. 1986. Analiza doświadczeń wielokrotnych zakładanych w blokach niekompletnych. Roczniki AR w Poznaniu, Rozprawy Naukowe, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Kaczmarek Z., Adamski T., Surma M. 2004. Interakcja genotypowo-środowiskowa dla plonu dwu- i sześciorzędowych linii DH jęczmienia. Biul. IHAR 231: 313 — 320.
Google Scholar

Kaczyński L. 1999. Reakcja odmian roślin rolniczych na czynniki środowiska, niezbędny zakres doświadczeń PDO na Dolnym Śląsku. Podstawy organizacji i planowania doświadczalnictwa z zarejestrowanymi odmianami roślin rolniczych na Dolnym Śląsku. Zesz. 1: 35 — 46.
Google Scholar

Kang M. S. 1998. Using genotype-by-environment interaction for crop cultivar development. Adv. in Agron. 62: 200 — 252.
Google Scholar

Mądry W. 2003. Analiza statystyczna miar stabilności na podstawie danych w klasyfikacji genotypy × środowiska. Cz. II. Model mieszany Shukli i model regresji łącznej. Colloquium Biometryczne, 33: 207 — 220.
Google Scholar

Mądry W., Kang M. S. 2005. Scheffe-Caliński and Shukla Models: Their Interpretation and usefulness in stability and adaptation analyses. Journal of Crop Improvement 14 (1/2): 325 — 369.
Google Scholar

Mądry W., Rajfura A. 2003. Analiza statystyczna miar stabilności na podstawie danych w klasyfikacji genotypy × środowiska. Cz. I. Model mieszany Scheffego-Calińskiego i model regresji łączonej. Colloquium Biometryczne 33: 181 —2 05.
Google Scholar

Maragi R., Kang M. S. 1997. SAS–STABLE: Stability analysis of balanced and unbalanced data. Agron. J. 90: 929 — 932.
Google Scholar

Mekbib F. 2003. Yield stability in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Euphytica 130: 147 — 153.
Google Scholar

Nurminiemi M., Madsen S., Rogali O. A., Bjørnstad Å., Ortiz R. 2002. Analysis of the genotype-environment interaction in the Nordic Region of Europe: relationships among stability statistics for grain yield. Euphytica 127: 123 — 132.
Google Scholar

Piepho H. P. 1998. Methods of comparing yield stability of cropping systems — a review. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 180: 193 — 213.
Google Scholar

Piepho H. P. 1999. Stability Analysis using SAS system. Agron. J. 91: 154 — 160.
Google Scholar

Ruszkowski M., Ruszkowska B., Siemion S., Uliński G., Witek T. 1971. Produkcyjność jęczmienia jarego i owsa w różnych warunkach siedliska. Pamiętnik Puławski 44: 71 — 82.
Google Scholar

SAS Institute Inc. 2004 a. BASE SAS 9.1.3 Procedures guide. Cary, NC, USA, SAS Publishing, SAS Institute Inc.
Google Scholar

SAS Institute Inc. 2004 b. SAS 9.1 Companion for Windows. Cary, NC, USA, SAS Publishing, SAS Institute Inc.
Google Scholar

Scheffé 1959. The analysis of variance. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
Google Scholar

Shukla G. K. 1972. Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype × environment components of variability. Heredity 29: 237 — 245.
Google Scholar

Witek T. (red.) 1981. Waloryzacja rolniczej przestrzeni produkcyjnej Polski według gmin. Puławy, IUNG.
Google Scholar


Published
2007-12-31

Cited by

Oleksiak, T. and Mańkowski, D. R. (2007) “Yielding stability and adaptation of spring barley cultivars to the conditions of Poland”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (246), pp. 45–54. doi: 10.37317/biul-2007-0005.

Authors

Tadeusz Oleksiak 
t.oleksiak@ihar.edu.pl
Pracownia Ekonomiki Nasiennictwa i Hodowli Roślin, Zakład Nasiennictwa i Nasionoznawstwa, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie Poland

Authors

Dariusz R. Mańkowski 

Pracownia Ekonomiki Nasiennictwa i Hodowli Roślin, Zakład Nasiennictwa i Nasionoznawstwa, Instytut Hodowli i Aklimatyzacji Roślin w Radzikowie Poland
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7499-8016

Statistics

Abstract views: 165
PDF downloads: 23


License

Copyright (c) 2007 Tadeusz Oleksiak, Dariusz R. Mańkowski

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>