Comparison of interspecific hybrids Lupinus albus (sensu lato) × Lupinus mutabilis in respect of some quantitative characters

Ewa Sawicka-Sienkiewicz

kghrin@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Renata Galek


Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Dariusz Zalewski


Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Jolanta Augiewicz


Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu (Poland)

Abstract

In the case of genus Lupinus, it is a very difficult task to obtain interspecific hybrids. Long-term studies were undertaken to overcome the crossability barriers between L. albus and L. mutabilis, and some seeds from certain cross combinations were yielded. The hybrid plants were propagated and the consecutive progenies evaluated. The interspecific hybrids and their parental species were compared in order to evaluate some quantitative characters. Nine interspecific hybrids of the generations F6 and F7 and ten parental forms (Lupinus mutabilis: XM.5, LM-13, LM-34, MUT-45, MUT-136, MUT-628; Lupinus albus sensu lato: L. graecus, L. vavilovi, L. termis, L. albus cv. WAT) were checked. Variance analysis showed significant differences in the study materials with regard to all characters investigated. Six hybrids: (L. termis × Mut-628), (L. termis × KW-epigonal mutant of L. mutabilis), (L. vavilovi × Mut-45), (L. vavilovi × LM-34), (XM.5 × L. vavilovi), (LM-13 × L. graecus) were found similar to the female parents and two hybrids (L. albus cv. WAT × Mut-136), (L. termis × XM.5) resembled the male parents. Four interspecific hybrids (L. termis × Mut-628), (L. termis × KW), (L. vavilovi × Mut-45), (L. vavilovi × LM-34) were distinguishable by seed size — 1000 seeds weight exceeding 300g — and made a homogenous group determined with the use of the Duncan test.


Keywords:

Lupinus, interspecific hybrids, quantitative characters

Augiewicz J., Sawicka-Sienkiewicz E., Kępa E. 2001. Wstępna ocena materiałów pochodzących ze skrzyżowania łubinu andyjskiego (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet) z przedstawicielami sekcji Albus. Część I. Analiza morfologiczna. Zesz. Naukowe AR we Wrocławiu. Rolnictwo LXXXII, Nr 427: 19 — 30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22630/EIOGZ.2001.43.2
Google Scholar

Brejdak E., Sawicka-Sienkiewicz E. 1997. Otrzymywanie mieszańców międzygatunkowych z L. mutabilis Sweet. Materiały Konferencyjne Łubin we Współczesnym Rolnictwie „Łubin — Białko — Ekologia” Olsztyn Kortowo: 65 — 72.
Google Scholar

Kalińska H., Augiewicz J., Sawicka-Sienkiewicz E. 2001. Wstępna ocena materiałów pochodzących ze skrzyżowania łubinu andyjskiego (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet) z przedstawicielami sekcji Albus. Część II. Analiza cytologiczna. Zeszyty Naukowe AR we Wrocławiu. Rolnictwo LXXXII, Nr 427: 63 — 72.
Google Scholar

Przyborowski J. A. 2003. Pre- i postzygotyczne bariery przy krzyżowaniu wybranych gatunków z rodzaju Lupinus. Rozprawy i Monografie, 78. UWM Olsztyn:1 — 58.
Google Scholar

Sawicka E. J. 1993. Indukowane mutacje u łubinu andyjskiego (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet). Prace Ogrodu Botanicznego PAN. Monografie i Rozprawy, Z.3: 1 — 112.
Google Scholar

Sawicka-Sienkiewicz E., Augiewicz J. 2004. Cytogenetics studies of Andean lupin. In.: van Santen and G.D. Hill (eds). Wild and Cultivated Lupins from the Tropics to the Poles. Proc. Int. Lupin Conf., Laugarvatn, Iceland: 79 — 85.
Google Scholar

Sawicka-Sienkiewicz E. J, Brejdak E. 1999. Interspecific hybrids of Andean lupin (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet). Proc. VIII Int. Lupin Conf. Asilomar, USA: 357 — 360.
Google Scholar

Sawicka-Sienkiewicz E.J., Kadłubiec W. 2001. Aktualny stan badań nad łubinem andyjskim (Lupinus mutabilis Sweet). Zeszyty Naukowe AR we Wrocławiu. Rolnictwo LXXXII, NR 427: 115 — 129.
Google Scholar


Published
2006-09-29

Cited by

Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, E. (2006) “Comparison of interspecific hybrids Lupinus albus (sensu lato) × Lupinus mutabilis in respect of some quantitative characters”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (240/241), pp. 253–259. doi: 10.37317/biul-2006-0059.

Authors

Ewa Sawicka-Sienkiewicz 
kghrin@upwr.edu.pl
Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Renata Galek 

Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Dariusz Zalewski 

Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu Poland

Authors

Jolanta Augiewicz 

Katedra Hodowli Roślin i Nasiennictwa, Akademia Rolnicza we Wrocławiu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 124
PDF downloads: 33


License

Copyright (c) 2006 Ewa Sawicka-Sienkiewicz, Renata Galek, Dariusz Zalewski, Jolanta Augiewicz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>