Effect of potassium fertilization under diversified water conditions on yield and quality of sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.)

Part I. Yielding response

Radosław Musolf

agro@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)

Witold Grzebisz


Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)

Witold Szczepaniak


Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu (Poland)

Abstract

To assess the effect of water conditions and K availability level on crops’ yields, the K-exhaustion type field experiment was established in 1991. In the years 1998–2000, the sugar beet, cultivar Mieszko was grown as a test crop. The experimental design comprised two levels of applied K (0, 150 kg K2O/ha) and four water treatments, i.e. control (C — rainfall only), irrigated to 70% FC (I), and 4 weeks drought periods imposed in July (D-I) or in August (D-II). The obtained results showed that long-term lack of K fertilization, even on soil rich in plant available potassium, resulted in about 20% yield of taproots decrease. Yield losses were due to both lower stock (by 11.4%) and lower plant mass (7.3%). The effects of water deficits on the K fertilized plots were much lower than on the K non-treated ones.


Keywords:

drought, K supply, stock, sugar beets, yield of beets

Beringer H. 1987. Hoehe und Wirkung der K-Duengung bei heutigem Ertragsniveau. Kali Briefe 18 Buentehof: 585 — 594.
Google Scholar

Borówczak F. 2002. Przyrodnicze i agrotechniczne uwarunkowania plonowania buraków cukrowych. Nowoczesna uprawa buraków cukrowych. Wydawnictwa AR Poznań.
Google Scholar

Draycott A. P. 1996. Aspects of fertiliser use in modern, high-yield sugar beet culture. IPI-Bulletin No. 15, Bazylea.
Google Scholar

Dzieżyc J. 1993. Czynniki plonotwórcze, plonowanie roślin. Praca zbiorowa. PWN, Warszawa: 419 — 422.
Google Scholar

Fotyma M., Scheppard M. 2000. Soil fertility evaluation in Czech Republic, Latvia, Poland, Slovak Republic and United Kingdom. Nawozy i nawożenie 2. IUNG Puławy.
Google Scholar

Grzebisz W. 1996. Efektywność i optymalizacja nawożenia. W: Nawożenie mineralne roślin uprawnych. Czuba R. (red.). Zakłady Chemiczne „Police” S.A.: 201 — 246.
Google Scholar

Grzebisz W., Barłóg P., Feć M. 1998. The dynamics of nutrient uptake by sugar beet and its effect on dry matter and sugar yields. Biblitheca Fragmenta Agronomica 3/98: 242 — 248.
Google Scholar

Grzebisz W., Musolf R., Barłóg P., Potarzycki J. 2001. Water shortages during vegetation, potassium fertilization and yields variability of sugar beet. Biul. IHAR 222: 19 — 29.
Google Scholar

Gutmański I. (red.). 1991. Produkcja buraka cukrowego. PWR i L, Poznań.
Google Scholar

Sturm H., Buchner A., Zerulla W. 1994. Gezielter düngen. DLG Verlag, Frankfurt, Main.
Google Scholar

Trętowski J., Wójcik A. R. 1988. Metodyka doświadczeń rolniczych. WSRP Siedlce: 124 — 136.
Google Scholar


Published
2004-12-31

Cited by

Musolf, R., Grzebisz, W. and Szczepaniak, W. (2004) “Effect of potassium fertilization under diversified water conditions on yield and quality of sugar beets (Beta vulgaris L.) : Part I. Yielding response”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (234), pp. 107–114. doi: 10.37317/biul-2004-0013.

Authors

Radosław Musolf 
agro@up.poznan.pl
Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Witold Grzebisz 

Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu Poland

Authors

Witold Szczepaniak 

Katedra Chemii Rolnej, Akademia Rolnicza w Poznaniu Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 70
PDF downloads: 27


License

Copyright (c) 2004 Radosław Musolf, Witold Grzebisz, Witold Szczepaniak

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>