Potassium fertilization, water shortages during vegetation and crop yielding variability the case of sugar beets

Witold Grzebisz

agro@up.poznan.pl
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural University, Poznań (Poland)

Radosław Musolf


Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural University, Poznań (Poland)

Przemysław Barłóg


Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural University, Poznań (Poland)

JarosłaW Potarczycki


Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural University, Poznań (Poland)

Abstract

The first part of this review documents the mechanisms of plant resistance to water shortages during growth. It has been indicated, that appropriate supply of crop plants with potassium improves their water management and consequently results in higher resistance to stresses, including droughts. The anti-stress potassium action is a consequence of higher K+ ions concentration in the soil solution (due to natural fertility or K fertilization); greater perpendicular range of the root system; faster growth rate of above-ground parts of a plant and, consequently, earlier coverage of soil surface. In the second part an attempt was made to explain the major reasons of considerable sugar beet yield losses in Poland, as well as their considerable dependence on weather conditions, i.e. year to year variability. The importance of factors was as follows (i) low, natural, level of available potassium (ii) high frequency of periods with water deficiency and (iii) insufficient, in relation to the nutrient requirement, K fertilization. Using experimental data it was shown that appropriate nutrition of sugar beet plants with potassium allowed them to survive during the critical growth stages and, consequently, reduced the risk of yield losses caused by drought.


Keywords:

crop plants, plant resistance to stresses, potassium functions, sugar beets, water shortages, yield losses

Aiken R. M., Smucker A. J. 1996. Root system regulation of whole plant growth. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 34: 325 — 346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.325
Google Scholar

Almani M. P., Mishani –Abd C., Samadi B. Y. 1997. Drought resistance in sugar beet genotypes. Iranian J.
Google Scholar

of Agric. Sci. 28, 3, 15 — 25.
Google Scholar

Amstrong D. (ed.) 1998. Potassium for agriculture. Better Crops 3: 39 pp.
Google Scholar

Bergmann W. 1992. Nutritional disorders of plants.4.1.4. Potassium (K). Gustaw Fisher Verlag, New York: 117 —132.
Google Scholar

Brown K. F., Biscoe P. V. 1985. Fibrous root growth and water use of sugar beet. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 105: 679 — 691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600059591
Google Scholar

COBORU 1991–2000. Syntezy wyników doświadczeń odmianowych. Słupia Wielka.
Google Scholar

Day W. 1981. Water stress and crop growth. In: Physiological processes limiting plant productivity. Johnson C. B. (ed.). Butterworths, London: 199 — 215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-408-10649-8.50015-0
Google Scholar

De Nobili M., Vittori Antisari L., Sequi P. 1990. K — uptake from subsoil. Proceedings of the 22nd Colloquium of the International Potash Institute „Development of K-fertilizer recommendations”. Soligorsk USSR, 18–23. 06. 1990. IPI: 133 — 144.
Google Scholar

Doorenbos J., Pruitt W. O. 1977. Water requirement. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper. No. 24, FAO Rome: 144 pp.
Google Scholar

Draycott A. P. 1996. Aspects of fertilizer use in modern, high-yield sugar beet culture. IPI Basel: 52 pp.
Google Scholar

Farat R., Kępińska-Kasprzak M., Kowalczak P., Mager P. 1995. Droughts in Poland. Gospodarka Wodna i Ochrona Wód 16: 141 pp.
Google Scholar

Fotyma M., Gosek S. 2000. Zmiany w zużyciu nawozów potasowych i ich konsekwencje dla żyzności gleby i poziomu produkcji roślinnej w Polsce. Nawozy i Nawożenie 1: 9 — 52.
Google Scholar

Grimme H. 1991. Soil moisture and K mobility. Proceedings of the 22nd Colloquium of the International Potash Institute „Development of K-fertilizer recommendations”. Soligorsk USSR, 18–23 VI 1990. IPI: 117 — 131.
Google Scholar

Grzebisz W. 1990. System korzeniowy rośliny, a żyzność gleby. Post. Nauk Rol. 4/5/6: 3 — 20.
Google Scholar

Grzebisz W., Barłóg P., Feć M. 1998. The dynamics of nutrient uptake by sugar beet and its effect on dry matter and sugar yield. Fragm. Agron. 3: 242 — 248.
Google Scholar

Grzebisz W. 2000. Nutrient management and advisory systems for sugar beet in Poland. Proceedings „Beet plant nutrition in sugar beet cropping systems for high yield and quality. Budapest, Hungary, 1–2 IX 1999: 203 — 210.
Google Scholar

Huck M.G. 1984. Water flux in the soil-root continuum. In: Roots, nutrient and water flax, and plant growth: 47 — 63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub49.c3
Google Scholar

Koźmiński C., Górski T., Michalska B. 1990. Climatic atlas of elements and phenomena hazardous to agriculture. AR Szczecin, IUNG Puławy: maps 51 — 55.
Google Scholar

Lomas J. 1995. Climat and agricultural production. Proceedings agrometeorology of cereals. Grzebisz W., Kowalczyk P., Szymczyk R. (eds.), Poznań, 3–7 VII 1995: 41 — 58.
Google Scholar

Marschner H., Kirkby E. A., Cakmak J. 1996. Effect of mineral nutritional status on shoot-root partitioning of photo-assimilates and cycling of mineral nutrients. J. Exp. Botany: 1255 — 1263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/47.Special_Issue.1255
Google Scholar

Monneveux P., Belhassen E. 1996. The diversity of drought adaptation in the wide. Plant Growth Regulation 20: 85 — 92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00024004
Google Scholar

Massoud M. M., Shalaby E. M. 1998. Response of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) varieties to irrigation intervals in Upper Egypt. II. Water consumption and water use efficiency. Assiut J. of Agric. Sci., 29, 5, 23–30.
Google Scholar

Plenzler W. 1995. The impact of agroclimatological conditions on the agricultural production in Poland. Proceedings Agrometeorology of Cereals. Grzebisz W., Kowalczyk P., Szymczyk R. (eds.). Poznań: 123 — 132.
Google Scholar

Polish Yearbooks of Agriculture. 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000.
Google Scholar

Rabbinge R. 1993. The ecological background of food production. In: Crop protection and sustainable agriculture. Wiley, Chichester (Ciba Foundation Symposium 177): 2 — 29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470514474.ch2
Google Scholar

Smucker A. J. M., Aiken R. M. 1992. Dynamic root responses to water deficits. Soil Sci. 154(4): 281 — 289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-199210000-00004
Google Scholar

Walker B. 1994. Global change strategy options in the extensive agriculture regions of the World. Climatic Change 27: 39 — 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01098472
Google Scholar

Taylor H. M., Klepper B. 1978. The role of rooting characteristics in the supply of water to plants. Adv. Agron. 30: 99 — 128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60704-X
Google Scholar

Zagdańska B. 1992. Fizjologiczne kryteria odporności roślin na suszę. Biul. IHAR 183: 11 — 17.
Google Scholar

Download


Published
2002-06-28

Cited by

Grzebisz, W. (2002) “Potassium fertilization, water shortages during vegetation and crop yielding variability the case of sugar beets”, Bulletin of Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, (222), pp. 19–30. doi: 10.37317/biul-2002-0042.

Authors

Witold Grzebisz 
agro@up.poznan.pl
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural University, Poznań Poland

Authors

Radosław Musolf 

Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural University, Poznań Poland

Authors

Przemysław Barłóg 

Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural University, Poznań Poland

Authors

JarosłaW Potarczycki 

Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Agricultural University, Poznań Poland

Statistics

Abstract views: 10
PDF downloads: 5


License

Copyright (c) 2025 Witold Grzebisz, Radosław Mu, Przemysław Barłóg, Jarosław Potarzycki

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Upon submitting the article, the Authors grant the Publisher a non-exclusive and free license to use the article for an indefinite period of time throughout the world in the following fields of use:

  1. Production and reproduction of copies of the article using a specific technique, including printing and digital technology.
  2. Placing on the market, lending or renting the original or copies of the article.
  3. Public performance, exhibition, display, reproduction, broadcasting and re-broadcasting, as well as making the article publicly available in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice.
  4. Including the article in a collective work.
  5. Uploading an article in electronic form to electronic platforms or otherwise introducing an article in electronic form to the Internet or other network.
  6. Dissemination of the article in electronic form on the Internet or other network, in collective work as well as independently.
  7. Making the article available in an electronic version in such a way that everyone can access it at a place and time of their choice, in particular via the Internet.

Authors by sending a request for publication:

  1. They consent to the publication of the article in the journal,
  2. They agree to give the publication a DOI (Digital Object Identifier),
  3. They undertake to comply with the publishing house's code of ethics in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), (http://ihar.edu.pl/biblioteka_i_wydawnictwa.php),
  4. They consent to the articles being made available in electronic form under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, in open access,
  5. They agree to send article metadata to commercial and non-commercial journal indexing databases.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>